March 21, 2018 8:46 PM, "Jiří Kovalský" wrote:
> Dne 20.3.2018 v 19:22 José J. Rodriguez napsal(a):
>> BTW, there are a couple of issues linked there which referenced 8.0 and > are
>> marked resolved anyway, I figure they can be deleted from the 9.0 spec?
>
> Yes, of course. Removing of obsolete
Dne 20.3.2018 v 19:22 José J. Rodriguez napsal(a):
Jiří Kovalský wrote:
No need to enter your findings anywhere. Simply clone the old test
specification for 9.0 version and do all edits in the new one. Then
inform your tribe leader or me with Hermien and we will update your
tribe accordingly
Jiří Kovalský wrote:
No need to enter your findings anywhere. Simply clone the old test
specification for 9.0 version and do all edits in the new one. Then
inform your tribe leader or me with Hermien and we will update your
tribe accordingly to link the latest specification.
Ok, cloned the
One more thing. José, can you please update your UPDATE (MINOR) status
to DONE in the Wiki [1] once you finish the updates?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/NetCAT+9.0+Test+Spec+Reviews#NetCAT9.0TestSpecReviews-JavaEditor
Thanks,
-Jirka
Dne 20.3.2018 v 15:00 Jiří Kovalský n
Dne 19.3.2018 v 20:26 José J. Rodriguez napsal(a):
Well, I should have reported way back then that I had finished the
edits, but this is my first time on netcat, so...
No worries, we like newcomers! :)
Anyway, i was wondering how we proceed from here, for example, the specs
page says "Netbea
Well, I should have reported way back then that I had finished the
edits, but this is my first time on netcat, so...
Anyway, i was wondering how we proceed from here, for example, the specs
page says "Netbeans 8.0", shouldn't it be copied to a new page titled
"9.0"? Also, was reporting my test
Sadly I have an idea :)
If you edit test case and save it using the button that will make
changes only in given test suite/specification, the test case will be
duplicated and this new duplicate will be used in the suite or
specification. Test cases in test suites are ordered by .
Initially i
March 11, 2018 11:08 AM, "Hermien Pellissier" wrote:
> Hi José,
>
> Oops! I edited test case 1.1 (Code folding after opening a file) and after
>
>> saving, it dropped to the bottom of it's test suite, so now it's 1.10...!!!
>> That's bad, as the test cases have a sort of logical order and somet
Hi José,
Oops! I edited test case 1.1 (Code folding after opening a file) and after
> saving, it dropped to the bottom of it's test suite, so now it's 1.10...!!!
> That's bad, as the test cases have a sort of logical order and sometimes
> refer to the previous one. I don't see a way to fix the ord
March 10, 2018 1:26 PM, "Jiří Kovalský" wrote:
> Yes, sure! If not you, nobody else will do it.
>
> Thanks a lot!
> -Jirka
>
> Dne 10.3.2018 v 19:05 jose.rodrig...@cenpalab.cu napsal(a):
>
>> March 10, 2018 7:42 AM, "Jiří Kovalský" wrote:
>> Did you modify the test specification accordingly?
Yes, sure! If not you, nobody else will do it.
Thanks a lot!
-Jirka
Dne 10.3.2018 v 19:05 jose.rodrig...@cenpalab.cu napsal(a):
March 10, 2018 7:42 AM, "Jiří Kovalský" wrote:
Did you modify the test specification accordingly?
No, should I?
Joe1962
---
March 10, 2018 7:42 AM, "Jiří Kovalský" wrote:
> Did you modify the test specification accordingly?
>
No, should I?
Joe1962
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscr...@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: net
Great job José. Did you modify the test specification accordingly?
Thanks a lot,
-Jirka
Dne 9.3.2018 v 21:34 José J. Rodriguez napsal(a):
I'm not getting this back from the list since I sent it over 3 hours
ago, so here it goes again, just in case. Sorry if it's turns out
duplicate...
-
I'm not getting this back from the list since I sent it over 3 hours
ago, so here it goes again, just in case. Sorry if it's turns out
duplicate...
---
Here's my complete review (search for the word FAIL for quick access,
there are 2 cases...):
netbeans netc
Here's my complete review (search for the word FAIL for quick access,
there are 2 cases...):
netbeans netcat Editor - Codefolding review:
1. Basic Code Folding...
1.1. Code folding after opening a file:
- OK. (Test Suite Note: there are initially no javadoc comments in
MyClass.java)
1.2.
Preliminary report, I'll get to the rest later today...
Java Editor Tribe Codefolding review:
1. Code folding after opening a file:
- OK. (Test Suite Note: there are initially no javadoc comments in
MyClass.java, though mentioned here)
2. Add javadoc code:
- OK.
3. Add/Remove
16 matches
Mail list logo
