Re: IPSec kernel oops on ppc64

2006-08-25 Thread Herbert Xu
Joy Latten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I installed 2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc4 + 2.6.18-rc4-mm2 > onto two pSeries power 5 (ppc64 lpars) machines. I configured > IPSec using the configuration listed below. Could you try straight 2.6.17? If that crashes too, then at least we can be sure that it isn

Re: Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7058] New: CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK breaks rp_filter checks

2006-08-25 Thread Herbert Xu
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Using a fwmark as a key for selecting among multiple routing tables (via "ip > rule" command) breaks the rp_filter functionality since the fwmark field is > not > initialized in function fib_validate_source. Because of this there is no way > to > assur

Re: ProxyARP and IPSec

2006-08-25 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: Hello! I'm thinking that David definitely has a point about having a usability problem, though. All other kind of tunnels have endpoint devices associated with them, and that would make all these kinds of problems go away, Yes, when you deal with sane practical set

Re: [PATCH 4/4] nfs: deadlock prevention for NFS

2006-08-25 Thread Indan Zupancic
> /* Check if this were the first socks: */ > if (nr_socks - socks == 0) > reserve += RX_RESERVE_PAGES; Can of course be: if (nr_socks == socks) reserve += RX_RESERVE_PAGES; Grumble, Indan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs

Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: VM deadlock avoidance framework

2006-08-25 Thread Indan Zupancic
On Fri, August 25, 2006 17:39, Peter Zijlstra said: > @@ -282,7 +282,8 @@ struct sk_buff { > nfctinfo:3; > __u8pkt_type:3, > fclone:2, > - ipvs_property:1; > +

Re: [2.6.17.8] NFS stall / BUG in UDP fragment processing / SKB trimming

2006-08-25 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 04:03:16PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > This patch doesn't apply at all to the latest 2.6.17-stable kernel tree. > Care to rediff it? Hmm, I just rebased and it actually applied as is to 2.6.17.11 :) Anyway, here is the result: [INET]: Use pskb_trim_unique when trimming page

Re: [PATCH] ethtool v4: add autoneg advertise feature

2006-08-25 Thread Bill Fink
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Jeff Kirsher wrote: > On 8/25/06, Bill Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I agree. Something like: > > > > ethtool -s ethx auto on advertise mode1+mode2+...+moden > > > > For example: > > > > ethtool -s ethx auto on advertise 100-half+100-full > > > > to

Re: [PATCH] ethtool v4: add autoneg advertise feature

2006-08-25 Thread Jeff Kirsher
On 8/25/06, Bill Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Michael Chan wrote: > Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > The old way of setting autonegotiation was using the > > following command: > > ethtool -s ethx speed 100 duplex full auto on > > now the command would be > > ethtool -s ethx aut

Re: [PATCH] Congestion control (modulo lp, bic): use BUILD_BUG_ON

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 03:57:41 +0400 > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vg

[patch 10/10] [TULIP] Update winbond840.c version

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
Signed-off-by: Valerie Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/tulip/winbond-840.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/net/tulip/winbond-840.c +++ linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/tulip/winbond

[patch 05/10] [TULIP] Defer tulip_select_media() to process context

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
From: Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Move tulip_select_media() processing to a workqueue, instead of delaying in interrupt context, edited by Kyle McMartin to use kevent thread, instead of creating its own workqueue. Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Valerie Hen

Re: Any one know If tcp timers should look empty when last reference to socket has been dropped?

2006-08-25 Thread Piet Delaney
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:38 -0700, Piet Delaney wrote: I was right, at least for 2.6.12, when we free the socket the timer should have list poison in them. retransmit_timer = { entry = { next = 0x100100, prev = 0x200200 }, expires = 44563, lock = { slock = 1,

[patch 09/10] [TULIP] Update tulip version

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
Signed-off-by: Valerie Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c |6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c +++ linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm1/drivers/net/tulip/tulip_c

[patch 03/10] [TULIP] Make DS21143 printout match lspci output

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
From: Thibaut Varene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Thibaut Varene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Valerie Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c |2 +- 1 files chang

[patch 07/10] [TULIP] Use tulip.h in winbond-840.c

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
From: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Include "tulip.h" in winbond-840.c and clean up lots of redundant definitions. Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Valerie Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <

[patch 00/10] [TULIP] Tulip update

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
This patch set includes all the non-controversial tulip patches from the parisc tree, plus a few extra cleanups. The major highlight is the patch moving tulip_select_media() and its associated delay to a work queue, a nice piece of work from Francois Romieu, with some tweaks by Kyle McMartin. -VA

[patch 06/10] [TULIP] Clean up tulip.h

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
From: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Update/cleanup some definitions in tulip.h and tulip_core.c. Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Valerie Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[patch 04/10] [TULIP] Flush MMIO writes in reset sequence

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
From: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The obvious safe registers to read is one from PCI config space. Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Valerie Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECT

[patch 02/10] [TULIP] Print physical address in tulip_init_one

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
From: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> As the cookie returned by pci_iomap() is fairly useless... [Compile warning on pci_resource_start() format fixed up by Valerie Henson.] Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Valer

[patch 01/10] [TULIP] Change tulip maintainer

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
Signed-off-by: Valerie Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MAINTAINERS|4 ++-- drivers/net/tulip/21142.c |2 +- drivers/net/tulip/eeprom.c |2 +- drivers/net/tulip/interrupt.c |2 +- drivers/net/tulip/media.c |2 +-

[patch 08/10] [TULIP] Handle pci_enable_device() errors in resume

2006-08-25 Thread Valerie Henson
Signed-off-by: Valerie Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/tulip/de2104x.c | 16 ++-- drivers/net/tulip/tulip_core.c |5 - drivers/net/tulip/winbond-840.c | 10 +++--- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) -

Re: [PATCH -rt DO NOT APPLY] Fix for tg3 networking lockup

2006-08-25 Thread Michael Chan
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 16:48 -0700, Marc Bevand wrote: > > But I was able to turn TSO on via ethtool -K. This is exactly the behavior I > would like to see in tg3. So are you saying the patch I applied actually > breaks ASF ? > Yes, the TSO firmware code that tg3 downloads to the chip using your

Re: [PATCH] IPV6 : segmentation offload not set correctly on TCP children

2006-08-25 Thread Herbert Xu
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 03:43:53PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > TCP over IPV6 would incorrectly inherit the GSO settings. > This would cause kernel to send Tcp Segmentation Offload packets for > IPV6 data to devices that can't handle it. It caused the sky2 driver > to lock http://bugzilla.kern

[PATCH] Congestion control (modulo lp, bic): use BUILD_BUG_ON

2006-08-25 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/ipv4/tcp_cubic.c |2 +- net/ipv4/tcp_highspeed.c |2 +- net/ipv4/tcp_htcp.c |2 +- net/ipv4/tcp_hybla.c |2 +- net/ipv4/tcp_vegas.c |2 +- net/ipv4/tcp_veno.c |2 +- net/ipv4/tcp_westwood.c |

Re: [PATCH -rt DO NOT APPLY] Fix for tg3 networking lockup

2006-08-25 Thread Marc Bevand
On 8/25/06, Michael Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The reason is that TSO on 5704 and older chips is done by firmware. ASF is also implemented by firmware. If ASF is enabled, there is no room to do TSO and ASF at the same time. Just for test purpose, I have applied the following patch to my

Re: [PATCH] ethtool v4: add autoneg advertise feature

2006-08-25 Thread Bill Fink
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Michael Chan wrote: > Jeff Kirsher wrote: > > > The old way of setting autonegotiation was using the > > following command: > > ethtool -s ethx speed 100 duplex full auto on > > now the command would be > > ethtool -s ethx auto on advertise 0x08 > > both commands would resul

Re: [PATCH] IPV6 : segmentation offload not set correctly on TCP children

2006-08-25 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:06:26 +0200 Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Stephen, > thanks for the fix, it fixes the problem for me. I closed the bug. On > which hardware did you reproduce the bug and how did you found it? Did > you use git bisect? > > Thomas Finding the li

Re: [PATCH] tcp_bic: use BUILD_BUG_ON

2006-08-25 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Please fix the other variants as well htcp, cubic, veno, vegas, ... Just one patch is necessary with all the files. -- Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All non-trivial abstractions, to some degree, are leaky. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of

RE: [IPV6] Q: corrupt checksums when transferring data

2006-08-25 Thread Brandeburg, Jesse
Stephen Hemminger wrote: > I think this the problem. Does it fix e1000? I am testing now. > > TCP over IPV6 would incorrectly inherit the GSO settings on accepted > children. > > --- linux-2.6.orig/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c2006-08-03 09:09:16.0 > -0700 +++ linux-2.6/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c

Re: [PATCH] IPV6 : segmentation offload not set correctly on TCP children

2006-08-25 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 01:06:26 +0200 Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Stephen, > thanks for the fix, it fixes the problem for me. I closed the bug. On > which hardware did you reproduce the bug and how did you found it? Did > you use git bisect? > > Thomas Using sky2 on

Re: IPSec kernel oops on ppc64

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:15:57 -0400 (EDT) > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Joy Latten wrote: > > > I installed 2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc4 + 2.6.18-rc4-mm2 > > onto two pSeries power 5 (ppc64 lpars) machines. I configured > > IPSec using the configuration listed below

Re: IPSec kernel oops on ppc64

2006-08-25 Thread James Morris
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Joy Latten wrote: > I installed 2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc4 + 2.6.18-rc4-mm2 > onto two pSeries power 5 (ppc64 lpars) machines. I configured > IPSec using the configuration listed below. Confirming that this does not crash on i686 or x86_64. - james -- James Morris <[EMAIL

Re: [NET_SCHED]: Add mask support to fwmark classifier

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:14:18 +0200 > [NET_SCHED]: Add mask support to fwmark classifier > > Support masking the nfmark value before the search. The mask value is > global for all filters contained in one instance. It can only be set > when a new instan

Re: [DECNET]: Add support for fwmark masks in routing rules

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:14:12 +0200 > [DECNET]: Add support for fwmark masks in routing rules > > Add support for fwmark masks. For compatibility a mask of 0x is used > when a mark value != 0 is sent without a mask. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick M

Re: [IPV4]: Add support for fwmark masks in routing rules

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 14:14:05 +0200 > [IPV4]: Add support for fwmark masks in routing rules > > Add a FRA_FWMASK attributes for fwmark masks. For compatibility a mask of > 0x is used when a mark value != 0 is sent without a mask. > > Signed-off

Re: [GIT PATCH] IPv6 Updates for net-2.6.19

2006-08-25 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:06:58 -0700 (PDT)), David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > > > > + .fwmark = skb->nfmark, : > It seems to make better sense to protect this with > IPV6_ROUTE_FWMARK instead of NETFILTER. And it is > consistent

Re: [GIT PATCH] IPv6 Updates for net-2.6.19

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 07:44:38 +0900 (JST) > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:29:25 -0400), Brian > Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > > > > .saddr = iph->saddr, > > > + .fwmark =

Re: [PATCH 2/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Fix size of fib6_rule_policy.

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:09:19 +0900 (JST) > [IPV6] ROUTE: Fix size of fib6_rule_policy. > > It should not be RTA_MAX+1 but FRA_MAX+1. > > Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u

Re: [PATCH 3/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Add support for fwmask in routing rules.

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:09:37 +0900 (JST) > [IPV6] ROUTE: Add support for fwmask in routing rules. > > Add support for fwmark masks. > A mask of 0x is used when a mark value != 0 is sent without a mask. > > Based on patch for net/ipv4/fib_rul

Re: [PATCH] IPV6 : segmentation offload not set correctly on TCP children

2006-08-25 Thread Thomas Glanzmann
Hello Stephen, thanks for the fix, it fixes the problem for me. I closed the bug. On which hardware did you reproduce the bug and how did you found it? Did you use git bisect? Thomas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROT

Re: [2.6.17.8] NFS stall / BUG in UDP fragment processing / SKB trimming

2006-08-25 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 10:59:11PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 09:19:19PM +, Nix wrote: > > > > The kernel log showed a heap of BUGs from somewhere inside the skb > > management layer, somewhere in UDP fragment processing while > > handling NFS requests. It starts like t

Re: [PATCH 1/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Fix FWMARK support.

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 00:08:54 +0900 (JST) > [IPV6] ROUTE: Fix FWMARK support. > > - Add missing nla_policy entry. > - type of fwmark is u32, not u8. > > Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, thanks. - To unsubscribe from this

Re: [PATCH -rt DO NOT APPLY] Fix for tg3 networking lockup

2006-08-25 Thread Michael Chan
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 22:33 +, Marc Bevand wrote: > Still, it would be great if ASF could be disabled, because I have > noticed that when ASF is enabled, the tg3 driver automatically disables > TSO (TCP Segmentation Offloading). Here is a dmesg output from a server > where I am seeing that beh

Re: [PATCH] IPV6 : segmentation offload not set correctly on TCP children

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:43:53 -0700 > TCP over IPV6 would incorrectly inherit the GSO settings. > This would cause kernel to send Tcp Segmentation Offload packets for > IPV6 data to devices that can't handle it. It caused the sky2 driver > to lock http

Re: [PATCH 44/44] [XFRM] IPV6: Support Mobile IPv6 extension headers sorting.

2006-08-25 Thread David Miller
From: Masahide NAKAMURA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 23:29:05 +0900 > Thank you for providing it quickly. > It works! Thank you for testing. I have pushed this bug fix into the net-2.6.19 tree. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a me

[PATCH] IPV6 : segmentation offload not set correctly on TCP children

2006-08-25 Thread Stephen Hemminger
TCP over IPV6 would incorrectly inherit the GSO settings. This would cause kernel to send Tcp Segmentation Offload packets for IPV6 data to devices that can't handle it. It caused the sky2 driver to lock http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7050 and the e1000 would generate bogus packets. I c

Re: [GIT PATCH] IPv6 Updates for net-2.6.19

2006-08-25 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:29:25 -0400), Brian Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says: > > .saddr = iph->saddr, > > + .fwmark = skb->nfmark, > > .flowlabel = (* (u32 *) iph)&IPV6_FLOWINFO_MASK, :

Re: [PATCH -rt DO NOT APPLY] Fix for tg3 networking lockup

2006-08-25 Thread Marc Bevand
Michael Chan broadcom.com> writes: > > Turning off ASF is just a matter of changing some bits in NVRAM > and recalculating the checksum. If you need the tool to do this, > I'll have someone send it to you. > > Note that on some of the blade servers, I believe ASF is vital > and should not be disa

IPSec kernel oops on ppc64

2006-08-25 Thread Joy Latten
I installed 2.6.17 + patch-2.6.18-rc4 + 2.6.18-rc4-mm2 onto two pSeries power 5 (ppc64 lpars) machines. I configured IPSec using the configuration listed below. A ping from one machine to the other, hangs. No packets leave the machine issuing the ping. When I tried sftp, I received following oop

Re: [stable] [PATCH] bridge-netfilter: don't overwrite memory outside of skb

2006-08-25 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:19:28PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The bridge netfilter code needs to check for space at the > front of the skb before overwriting; otherwise if skb from > device doesn't have headroom, then it will cause random > memory corruption. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemm

(no subject)

2006-08-25 Thread ashish gawarikar
subscribe netdev - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[patch] d80211: fix crash in ieee80211_rx_michael_mic_report()

2006-08-25 Thread David Kimdon
This fixes a crash at ieee80211.c line 3461, ieee80211_rx_michael_mic_report() (rx->sdata->type == IEEE80211_IF_TYPE_AP). rx.sdata needs to be set before calling ieee80211_rx_michael_mic_report(). Signed-off-by: Elliot Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7058] New: CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK breaks rp_filter checks

2006-08-25 Thread Andrew Morton
Begin forwarded message: Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:29:52 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 7058] New: CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK breaks rp_filter checks http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7058 Summary: CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK breaks r

Re: [PATCH 4/4] nfs: deadlock prevention for NFS

2006-08-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 16:14 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Grumble... If your patches are targetting NFS, could you please at the > very least Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or myself. Sorry, will make sure you're on the CC list next round. > On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 17:40 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >

RE: [IPV6] Q: corrupt checksums when transferring data

2006-08-25 Thread Brandeburg, Jesse
Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:13:48 -0700 > "Brandeburg, Jesse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm enabling e1000 to offload IPv6 since the 2.6.18+ kernels support >> it. The kernel I'm testing is 2.6.18-rc4. > > Yes, something is wrong with the GSO code. I am bisecting this

Re: [PATCH 4/4] nfs: deadlock prevention for NFS

2006-08-25 Thread Trond Myklebust
Grumble... If your patches are targetting NFS, could you please at the very least Cc [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or myself. On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 17:40 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Provide a proper a_ops->swapfile() implementation for NFS. This will > set the NFS socket to SOCK_VMIO and put the socke

Re: [GIT PATCH] IPv6 Updates for net-2.6.19

2006-08-25 Thread Brian Haley
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c index c9f74c1..9b50e0c 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/route.c +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c @@ -703,6 +703,7 @@ void ip6_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb .ip6_u = { .daddr = iph->daddr,

Re: RTL8136

2006-08-25 Thread Francois Romieu
Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > In case you don't yet have an lspci dump for an RTL8136, here's one for a > device which is working with the r1000 driver which is supplied with Ubuntu > dapper (though the machine in question - a Toshiba Equium A110-233 - is > actually running Debian testing.)

Re: [IPV6] Q: corrupt checksums when transferring data

2006-08-25 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:13:48 -0700 "Brandeburg, Jesse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm enabling e1000 to offload IPv6 since the 2.6.18+ kernels support it. > The kernel I'm testing is 2.6.18-rc4. Yes, something is wrong with the GSO code. I am bisecting this bug http://bugzilla.kernel.

Re: [PATCH 01/3] d80211: add support for SIOCSIWRATE, SIOCSIWTXPOW and SIOCSIWPOWER

2006-08-25 Thread Jouni Malinen
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:30:22PM -0700, Mohamed Abbas wrote: > the attached patch will add support to handle these iw_handle > SIOC[S/G]IWRATE, SIOC[S/G]IWTXPOW and SIOC[S/G]IWPOWER. It also added > some changes in ieee80211_ioctl_giwrange function to report supported > channels and rates.

RTL8136

2006-08-25 Thread Darren Salt
In case you don't yet have an lspci dump for an RTL8136, here's one for a device which is working with the r1000 driver which is supplied with Ubuntu dapper (though the machine in question - a Toshiba Equium A110-233 - is actually running Debian testing.) I _should_ be able to test your patches on

Re: [PATCH 01/3] d80211: add support for SIOCSIWRATE, SIOCSIWTXPOW and SIOCSIWPOWER

2006-08-25 Thread Mohamed Abbas
I will separate each pair of S/G in separate patch so it will be easier to discuss each set separately. I will provide the patch this weekend taking into account the comments provided Thanks Mohamed Jouni Malinen wrote: On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 05:30:22PM -0700, Mohamed Abbas wrote: the at

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17 2/9] NetXen: Hardware access routines

2006-08-25 Thread Sanjeev Jorapur
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 07:03 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:57:23 +0530 > "Amit S. Kale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We can certainly create a table for all error messages. It'll hurt > > readability > > of code in many of the other places where printks are used to

[IPV6] Q: corrupt checksums when transferring data

2006-08-25 Thread Brandeburg, Jesse
I'm enabling e1000 to offload IPv6 since the 2.6.18+ kernels support it. The kernel I'm testing is 2.6.18-rc4. Everything with the hardware offload is working fine, but it appears that the GSO code may not correctly segment frames sometimes for IPv6 traffic. I did a tcpdump on both ends with all

Re: [PATCH 0/3] [IPV6] Policy Routing Updates

2006-08-25 Thread Thomas Graf
* YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-08-26 00:08 > Hello. > > Here's some IPv6 policy rouging fixes on top of net-2.6.19 tree. > > [PATCH 1/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Fix FWMARK support. > [PATCH 2/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Fix size of fib6_rule_policy. > > If we accept Patrick's IPv4 fwm

Re: [GIT PATCH] IPv6 Updates for net-2.6.19

2006-08-25 Thread Thomas Graf
* YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / ?$B5HF#1QL@ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-08-25 17:21 > commit 10204d532f5f8bb379009ba0bee2113bafda72be > Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon Aug 21 19:22:01 2006 +0900 > > [IPV6] ROUTE: Routing by FWMARK. > > Based on patch by Jean Lorchat <[E

Re: [PATCH 0/4] VM deadlock prevention -v5

2006-08-25 Thread Rik van Riel
Christoph Lameter wrote: On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote: The basic premises is that network sockets serving the VM need undisturbed functionality in the face of severe memory shortage. This patch-set provides the framework to provide this. Hmmm.. Is it not possible to avoid the me

Re: [PATCH 0/4] VM deadlock prevention -v5

2006-08-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 08:51 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > The basic premises is that network sockets serving the VM need undisturbed > > functionality in the face of severe memory shortage. > > > > This patch-set provides the framework to provi

[PATCH 1/4] net: VM deadlock avoidance framework

2006-08-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
The core of the VM deadlock avoidance framework. In order to provide robust networked block devices there must be a guarantee of progress. That is, the block device must never stall because of OOM because the device itself might be needed to get out of OOM (reclaim pageout). This means that the

Re: [PATCH 0/4] VM deadlock prevention -v5

2006-08-25 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > The basic premises is that network sockets serving the VM need undisturbed > functionality in the face of severe memory shortage. > > This patch-set provides the framework to provide this. Hmmm.. Is it not possible to avoid the memory pools by guaran

[PATCH 4/4] nfs: deadlock prevention for NFS

2006-08-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Provide a proper a_ops->swapfile() implementation for NFS. This will set the NFS socket to SOCK_VMIO and put the socket reconnection under PF_MEMALLOC (I hope this is enough, otherwise more work needs to be done). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/nfs/file.c

[PATCH 0/4] VM deadlock prevention -v5

2006-08-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Hi, The latest version of the VM deadlock prevention work. The basic premises is that network sockets serving the VM need undisturbed functionality in the face of severe memory shortage. This patch-set provides the framework to provide this. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs

[PATCH 3/4] nbd: deadlock prevention for NBD

2006-08-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Use sk_set_vmio() on the nbd socket. Limit each request to 1 page, so that the request throttling also limits the number of in-flight pages and force the IO scheduler to NOOP as anything else doesn't make sense anyway. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Phill

[PATCH 2/4] blkdev: iosched selection for queue creation

2006-08-25 Thread Peter Zijlstra
Provide an block queue init function that allows to set an elevator. And a function to pin the current elevator. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- block/elevator.c |5 + block/ll_rw_blk.c | 12 ++-

[PATCH 2/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Fix size of fib6_rule_policy.

2006-08-25 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
[IPV6] ROUTE: Fix size of fib6_rule_policy. It should not be RTA_MAX+1 but FRA_MAX+1. Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c b/net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c index b4cd5

[PATCH 0/3] [IPV6] Policy Routing Updates

2006-08-25 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
Hello. Here's some IPv6 policy rouging fixes on top of net-2.6.19 tree. [PATCH 1/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Fix FWMARK support. [PATCH 2/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Fix size of fib6_rule_policy. If we accept Patrick's IPv4 fwmask patch, here's the one for IPv6. [PATCH 3/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Add support for fwmask

[PATCH 1/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Fix FWMARK support.

2006-08-25 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
[IPV6] ROUTE: Fix FWMARK support. - Add missing nla_policy entry. - type of fwmark is u32, not u8. Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/fib6_rules.c b/net/ipv6/fib6_rules

[PATCH 3/3] [IPV6] ROUTE: Add support for fwmask in routing rules.

2006-08-25 Thread YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
[IPV6] ROUTE: Add support for fwmask in routing rules. Add support for fwmark masks. A mask of 0x is used when a mark value != 0 is sent without a mask. Based on patch for net/ipv4/fib_rules.c by Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --

Re: [NET_SCHED]: Add mask support to fwmark classifier

2006-08-25 Thread jamal
On Fri, 2006-25-08 at 14:02 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Thomas Graf wrote: > > * Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-08-25 12:29 > > > >>The problem is that in order to avoid walking through all filters > >>contained in one instance, we need to mask the value before the > >>lookup. This m

Re: [PATCH 44/44] [XFRM] IPV6: Support Mobile IPv6 extension headers sorting.

2006-08-25 Thread Masahide NAKAMURA
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006 03:16:51 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Masahide NAKAMURA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 19:06:40 +0900 > > > I've found a problem about MIPv6 CN with the patch below. > > We just need to search by priority in the inexact list, even

RE: [PATCH 0/3] secid reconciliation-v01: Repost patchset with up dates

2006-08-25 Thread James Morris
On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Venkat Yekkirala wrote: > > I like these changes, but wondering why you haven't supplied > > code for the > > outbound case ? > > > > > > - James > > The code for the outbound is still in the works. I hope to have it > out in a week or so. Ok, I guess we should wait unti

RE: [PATCH 0/3] secid reconciliation-v01: Repost patchset with up dates

2006-08-25 Thread Venkat Yekkirala
> I like these changes, but wondering why you haven't supplied > code for the > outbound case ? > > > - James The code for the outbound is still in the works. I hope to have it out in a week or so. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17 0/9] NetXen: 1G/10G Ethernet Driver

2006-08-25 Thread Amit S. Kale
Hi Don, Thanks. We'll lindent the sources and post an update asap. -Amit On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:34, Don Fry wrote: > It looks like you have not run the source throught Lindent as previously > requested. Before you submit the code again, please use the Lindent > script. > > I can get the c

Re: [PATCH 0/7] [DCCP]: Fixes and enhancements

2006-08-25 Thread Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
On 8/24/06, Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I spent all of today on USAGI's IPSEC/MIPV6 patches and related > issues, so I'll look into this tomorrow. > > Thanks Ian. > Yes I saw that. Take your time as this is nowhere near as important! Sigh, I'm still busy indeed, gave a quick look

Re: [PATCH 2.6.17 0/9] NetXen: 1G/10G Ethernet Driver - patch for big-endian systems

2006-08-25 Thread Amit S. Kale
Wendy, Michael, Ueimor, Thanks for the patch and feedback. We'll integrate these into our driver and post an update asap. -Amit On Friday 25 August 2006 03:10, Francois Romieu wrote: > wen xiong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > [...] > > > diff -Nuar old/drivers/net/netxen/netxen_nic_hw.c > > new/driver

Re: [NET_SCHED]: Add mask support to fwmark classifier

2006-08-25 Thread jamal
On Fri, 2006-25-08 at 14:02 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Thomas Graf wrote: > > * Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-08-25 12:29 > > > >>The problem is that in order to avoid walking through all filters > >>contained in one instance, we need to mask the value before the > >>lookup. This m

Re: [DECNET]: Add support for fwmark masks in routing rules

2006-08-25 Thread Steven Whitehouse
Hi, On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 02:14:12PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > [DECNET]: Add support for fwmark masks in routing rules > > Add support for fwmark masks. For compatibility a mask of 0x is used > when a mark value != 0 is sent without a mask. > > Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[E

[IPV4]: Add support for fwmark masks in routing rules

2006-08-25 Thread Patrick McHardy
Hi Dave, these three patches add support for masking the nfmark value in a few spots where it would be useful in an attempt to make life easier for users using it for multiple unrelated things. [IPV4]: Add support for fwmark masks in routing rules Add a FRA_FWMASK attributes for fwmark masks. Fo

[DECNET]: Add support for fwmark masks in routing rules

2006-08-25 Thread Patrick McHardy
[DECNET]: Add support for fwmark masks in routing rules Add support for fwmark masks. For compatibility a mask of 0x is used when a mark value != 0 is sent without a mask. Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- commit bcd4f6996453aaf0a8d5515dcc533115621c961f tree 62909d3d

[NET_SCHED]: Add mask support to fwmark classifier

2006-08-25 Thread Patrick McHardy
[NET_SCHED]: Add mask support to fwmark classifier Support masking the nfmark value before the search. The mask value is global for all filters contained in one instance. It can only be set when a new instance is created, all filters must specify the same mask. Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <[EM

Re: [NET_SCHED]: Add mask support to fwmark classifier

2006-08-25 Thread Patrick McHardy
Thomas Graf wrote: > * Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-08-25 12:29 > >>The problem is that in order to avoid walking through all filters >>contained in one instance, we need to mask the value before the >>lookup. This means all filters share the same mask, which is >>taken from the first

IBM eHEA Device Driver upstream inclusion

2006-08-25 Thread Jan-Bernd Themann
Hi Jeff, the IBM eHEA Device Driver has been discussed on the netdev, linux-ppc and kernel mailing list for some time. The latest patch set we posted can be found at: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg12820.html As the discussion seems to have settled, please consider our driver for upstre

[RFC take3] add nl80211

2006-08-25 Thread Johannes Berg
This patch adds nl80211, a netlink based configuration system for wireless hardware. It currently features a few helper commands and commands to add and remove virtual interfaces and to inject packets. Support for nl80211 in d80211 is in a follow-up patch. There should be support for notification

[RFC take3] make d80211 use nl80211

2006-08-25 Thread Johannes Berg
This patch makes d80211 partially configurable using the infrastructure that nl80211 provides. So far, it allows packet injection and adding/removing virtual interfaces. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- wireless-dev.orig/net/d80211/Kconfig2006-08-25 11:31:01.0

Re: [NET_SCHED]: Add mask support to fwmark classifier

2006-08-25 Thread Thomas Graf
* Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-08-25 12:29 > This patch adds support to mask the nfmark value before the lookup > the the fw classifier. Unfortunately it has some drawbacks, so I'd > be interested if anyone can think of a better way. > > The problem is that in order to avoid walking th

[PATCH] remove third bogus argument from NLA_PUT_FLAG

2006-08-25 Thread Johannes Berg
This patch removes the 'value' argument from NLA_PUT_FLAG which is unused anyway. The documentation comment was already correct so it doesn't need an update :) Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- wireless-dev.orig/include/net/netlink.h 2006-08-25 12:46:30.0 +0200 +++

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/9] deadlock prevention core

2006-08-25 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > - We expect that the lots-of-dirty-anon-memory-over-swap-over-network > > scenario might still cause deadlocks. > > > > I assert that this can be solved by putting swap on local disks. Peter > > asserts that this isn't acceptable due to disk unreliability. I point > > out that

Re: [RFC] add nl80211

2006-08-25 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 12:30 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > That's exactly what I would have done as well. Alright. Changing it, then I'll repost. Again :) johannes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info a

Re: [RFC] add nl80211

2006-08-25 Thread Thomas Graf
* Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2006-08-25 11:04 > I completely reworked that now so it will: > * create a nested NL80211_ATTR_INTERFACE_LIST with nested { >* 1..N attributes, with nested { > * ATTR_IFINDEX and > * ATTR_IFNAME >} > } > > how does that sound? Maybe I should

[NET_SCHED]: Add mask support to fwmark classifier

2006-08-25 Thread Patrick McHardy
This patch adds support to mask the nfmark value before the lookup the the fw classifier. Unfortunately it has some drawbacks, so I'd be interested if anyone can think of a better way. The problem is that in order to avoid walking through all filters contained in one instance, we need to mask the

  1   2   >