On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 08:26 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
>
> We shouldn't make it too complicated. We can always select different
> settings
> in the defconfig file. My thinking here is to better wast a little
> memory
> with a potential performance improvement. Just me 0.02$
If it gets really c
On Friday 11 January 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 09:48 -0800, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:38:17PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > On Saturday 05 January 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 10:50 +0100, Stefan
Make FIB TRIE go through sparse checker without warnings.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:35:37.0 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:41:57.0 -0800
@@ -653,7 +653,6 @@ static struct node *resize(str
printk related cleanups:
* Get rid of unused printk wrappers.
* Make bug checks into KERN_WARNING because KERN_DEBUG gets ignored
* Turn one cryptic old message into something real
* Make sure all messages have KERN_XXX
---
net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c |6 ++
net/ipv4/fib_hash.c |
Turn the unused size field into a useful counter for the number
of routes.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:30:28.0 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:30:36.0 -0800
@@ -149,10 +149,10 @@ struct tri
trie_init is worthless it is just zeroing stuff that is already
zero! Move the memset() down to make it obvious.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 21:56:47.0 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:03:47.0
The FIB TRIE code has a bunch of statistics, but the code is hidden
behind an ifdef that was never implemented. Since it was dead code,
it was broken as well.
This patch fixes that by making it a config option.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/ipv4/Kconfig 2008-01-
Use %u instead of %d when printing unsigned values.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:30:36.0 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:30:46.0 -0800
@@ -2100,13 +2100,13 @@ static void trie_show_stats(str
The revision element must of been part of an earlier design,
because currently it is set but never used.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:18:34.0 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:26:34.0 -0800
@@
The only error from fib_insert_node is if memory allocation fails,
so instead of passing by reference, just use the convention of returning
NULL.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:04:08.0 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c
Did some work cleaning up FIB Trie today. The only real change
is the output format for /proc/net/fib_triestat.
--
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at htt
The size of structures is a debug thing, not something that needs to
be part of a /proc api.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:29:20.0 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/fib_trie.c 2008-01-11 22:30:28.0 -0800
@@ -1962,8 +19
Hello,
I saw somewhere (maybe in this mailing list a while ago) that there
might be a Linux Kernel Developers' Netconf conference at conf.au
2008.
Does anyone here know if such a thing is planned ?
Regards,
Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body o
Hello.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:10:57 -0800), Vince
Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> #define IN_MULTICAST_NET 0xF000
>
> +#define IN_CLASSE(a) long int) (a)) & 0xf000) == 0xf000)
> +#define IN_CLASSE_NET 0xff00
> +#
On Jan 10, 2008 9:24 AM, Chris Friesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a recent userspace app change, we've started seeing packets being
> dropped by the ethernet hardware (e1000, NAPI is enabled). The
> error/dropped/fifo counts are going up in ethtool:
(These are perhaps too obvious, but I d
Sorry. that i interfere in this subject.
Do you recommend CONFIG_IRQBALANCE to be enabled?
If it is enabled - irq's not jumping nonstop over processors. softirqd
changing this behavior.
If it is disabled, irq's distributed over each processor, and in loaded
systems it seems harmful.
I work a l
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:48:57 -0800 (PST)),
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:41:20 +0900 (JST)
>
> > There is no positive consesus on this draft
> > at the intarea meeting in Van
On Fri, 2008-11-01 at 18:42 -0200, Dzianis Kahanovich wrote:
> About script example:
> While I compose filter, I check flag ($TC_INDEX2MARK), tells me are patch
> applied or no. If no - I use usual "-j MARK --set-mark", else I use classid to
> change mark. All in ingress only. For example:
> tc fi
echo "1" >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/promote_secondaries
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: "Chris Friesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:59:26 -0600
> I'd love to work on newer kernels, but we have a commitment to our
> customers to support multiple releases for a significant amount of time.
And by asking here for people to dig into it for you, you are asking
peo
From: Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:29:15 -0800
> I leave it up to you, the developers, to decide if you want to use these
> patches.
Vince, please just ignore these turkeys who are dismissing
your patch and respin it against current sources as I asked
of you.
I'll a
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:41:20 +0900 (JST)
> There is no positive consesus on this draft
> at the intarea meeting in Vancouver, right?
>
> We cannot / should not enable that space until we have reached
> a consensus on it.
This is so incredibly
From: Benny Amorsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:09:32 +0100
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > No IRQ balancing should be done at all for networking device
> > interrupts, with zero exceptions. It destroys performance.
>
> Does irqbalanced need to be taught about
On Friday, 11 of January 2008, supersud501 wrote:
>
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721
> allright, didn't see that before, sorry, here are the results:
>
> kernel 2.6.23.12 acpi=off: when shutting down the system doesn't
> poweroff (of course), but p
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 10:01 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:58:05PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> > Ok. Yes, we will of course adhere to that, but I was wondering whether
> > maybe the net stack assumes somewhere that a packet it got from the
> > driver can be written to
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:58:05PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>
> Ok. Yes, we will of course adhere to that, but I was wondering whether
> maybe the net stack assumes somewhere that a packet it got from the
> driver can be written to w/o copying.
All parts of the rx stack support clone handling b
On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 09:31 +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Is it ok to do this? Will something freak out if we pass a cloned skb to
> > netif_rx()?
>
> Sounds OK as long as you stick to the rules of cloned skb's, e.g., not
> writing to them unless you'
Linux version 2.6.23.9 vanilla
Jan 7 02:24:11 eunite BUG: scheduling while atomic:
mii-tool/0x0002/31658
Jan 7 02:24:11 eunite [] schedule+0x27a/0x35e
Jan 7 02:24:11 eunite [] __mod_timer+0xac/0xbc
Jan 7 02:24:11 eunite [] schedule_timeout+0x43/0x9f
Jan 7 02:24:11 eunite [] process_timeou
Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it ok to do this? Will something freak out if we pass a cloned skb to
> netif_rx()?
Sounds OK as long as you stick to the rules of cloned skb's, e.g., not
writing to them unless you've copied it.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org
Chris Friesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd love to work on newer kernels, but we have a commitment to our
> customers to support multiple releases for a significant amount of time.
Since you've made the commitment, you should stick to it and resolve
the issues without asking us to contribut
Marco Berizzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I insert the rule number #601 packets to
> x.y.z.214 aren't ate by xfrm anymore. This
> happens when rp_filter is set to 1 on eth0.
> Disabling rp_filter on eth0 resolve the problem:
> xfrm eat the packets.
> Is this the expected behaviour? Why shou
On Jan 11, 2008 3:17 AM, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In 802.11n, there is a case where multiple data frames are received
> aggregated into a single frame (A-MSDU).
>
> Currently, we copy each of these frames out into their own skb, but
> because of the alignment with that etc. I star
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721
On Friday, 11 of January 2008, supersud501 wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:03:00 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 09:48 -0800, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:38:17PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 January 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 10:50 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > > Performance tests done by AMCC have shown t
Hi Stephen,
Do you still remember what this is for (got added along with other TCP
hint stuff)? What kind of problem you saw back then (or who saw
problems)?
@@ -1605,6 +1711,10 @@ static void tcp_undo_cwr(struct sock *sk, const int
undo)
}
tcp_moderate_cwnd(tp);
tp->snd
Signed-off-by: Bernard Pidoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/net/rose.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/rose.h b/include/net/rose.h
index d3ab453..0cfdc0e 100644
--- a/include/net/rose.h
+++ b/include/net/rose.h
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ struct ro
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9721
On Friday, 11 of January 2008, supersud501 wrote:
>
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:03:00 -0800
> > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
>
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:03:00 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 13:05:34 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.or
I'd like some feedback on a change to TIPC that I plan
to submit to netdev/kernel.org. At this stage, I'm interested
in what people think about using the protocol parameter
of the socket interface to select a TIPC stack for the socket.
My co-worker, Chris Friesen, has suggested that it would
be m
Hello Auke,
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:41 -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
> > Even hw structure has not been used, why it has been passed into
> > e1000_io_write function?
>
> 2.6.12.3? why do you care? that code is probably long gone... was that
> function
> even used?
I noticed that this also happens o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I want to make a bond with my wireless card. The ipw driver create two
interfaces (wlan0 and wmaster0). When i switch the rf_kill button,
ifplug detect wlan0 unplugged but not wmaster0. If i down wlan0 (while
rf_kil ), bonding detect the inactivity when i up the i
Breno Leitao wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 17:48 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Breno Leitao a écrit :
Take a look at the interrupt table this time:
io-dolphins:~/leitao # cat /proc/interrupts | grep eth[1]*[67]
277: 151362450 13 14 13 14
15
Hello Denys,
I've installed sysstat (good tools!) and the result is very similar
to the one which appears at top, take a look:
13:34:23 CPU %user %nice%sys %iowait%irq %soft %steal
%idleintr/s
13:34:24 all0.000.002.720.000.25 12.130.99
Jeba Anandhan wrote:
> Hi all,
> i have doubt in e1000_io_write().
>
> void
> e1000_io_write(struct e1000_hw *hw, unsigned long port, uint32_t value)
> {
> outl(value, port);
> }
>
>
> kernel version: 2.6.12.3
>
>
> Even hw structure has not been used, why it has been passed into
> e10
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/davicom.c b/drivers/net/phy/davicom.c
index 7ed632d..6bdc32f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/davicom.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/davicom.c
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
#define MII_DM9161_SCR 0x10
#define MII_DM9161_SCR_INIT0x0610
+#define MII_DM9161_SCR_RMII0x0100
/
On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 17:48 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Breno Leitao a écrit :
> > Take a look at the interrupt table this time:
> >
> > io-dolphins:~/leitao # cat /proc/interrupts | grep eth[1]*[67]
> > 277: 151362450 13 14 13 14
> >15
The test command is:
#sudo taskset -c 7 ./netserver
#sudo taskset -c 0 ./netperf -t TCP_RR -l 60 -H 127.0.0.1 -i 50,3 -I 99,5 -- -r
1,1
A couple of comments/questions on the command lines:
*) netperf/netserver support CPU affinity within themselves with the
global -T option to netperf. Is th
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:38:17PM +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Saturday 05 January 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 10:50 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > Performance tests done by AMCC have shown that 256 buffer increase the
> > > performance of the Linux EMAC driv
jamal wrote:
Yes, I do so. But there are simple:
---
if [[ $[TC_INDEX2MARK] == 0 ]] ; then
==1
c=${c//action ipt -j MARK --set-mark /flowid :}
c=${c//action ipt -j MARK --set-mark 0x/flowid :}
fi
$c
---
I didnt quiet understand what you have above. Does your script above
read the flow
also sprach Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.11.1833 +0100]:
> This tweak is "recent" (2.6.16 as far as I remember), so I suppose
> the reason is to not puzzled people with a changed default
> behavior.
Your instant and helpful responses are most appreciated!
--
martin | http://maddu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> I notice that the vendor-supplied driver doesn't have these bugs.
The M in POMS stands for "my".
[...]
> Would you be interested in some cleanup patches ?
Yes.
> In particular, I think I can get rid of tx->lock entirely, or at least
> take it off
Maybe good idea to use sysstat ?
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/sebastien.godard/
For example:
visp-1 ~ # mpstat -P ALL 1
Linux 2.6.24-rc7-devel (visp-1) 01/11/08
19:27:57 CPU %user %nice%sys %iowait%irq %soft %steal
%idleintr/s
19:27:58 all0.000.000.0
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.11.1813 +0100]:
There is a tweak in /proc/sys which activate secondaries promotion when a
primary is deleted.
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/promote_secondaries
I think it changes the behavior to the one you wish.
T
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:17:02PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > from Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
> > (aka "class-E") address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
>
also sprach Daniel Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.01.11.1813 +0100]:
> There is a tweak in /proc/sys which activate secondaries promotion when a
> primary is deleted.
>
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/promote_secondaries
>
> I think it changes the behavior to the one you wish.
Totally. That woul
Hello all.
Sorry for offtopic. I subscribe only on [EMAIL PROTECTED] try
send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get "Undelivered Mail Returned to
Sender". May i do small offtop? This maillist have many people that
known lartc "in code" and i hope its help for my idea. Thanks.
Simple Question
Legen
martin f krafft wrote:
Dear list,
When I add an address to an interface whose network prefix is the
same as that of an address already bound to the interface, the new
address becomes a secondary address. As per
http://www.policyrouting.org/iproute2.doc.html:
"secondary --- this address is not
Dear list,
When I add an address to an interface whose network prefix is the
same as that of an address already bound to the interface, the new
address becomes a secondary address. As per
http://www.policyrouting.org/iproute2.doc.html:
"secondary --- this address is not used when selecting the
Hi,
On 11/01/2008, Jens Osterkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ishizaki,
>
> Linas has left the company and is no longer doing kernel related stuff,
> so I suggest, given Jeff is ok with that, that the two of us take over
> spidernet maintainership.
>
> Jens
>
> ---
>
> Change maintainership fo
Breno Leitao a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 12:52 -0800, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
Breno Leitao wrote:
When I run netperf in just one interface, I get 940.95 * 10^6 bits/sec
of transfer rate. If I run 4 netperf against 4 different interfaces, I
get around 720 * 10^6 bits/sec.
I
On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 12:52 -0800, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> Breno Leitao wrote:
> > When I run netperf in just one interface, I get 940.95 * 10^6 bits/sec
> > of transfer rate. If I run 4 netperf against 4 different interfaces, I
> > get around 720 * 10^6 bits/sec.
>
> I hope this explanation ma
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Benjamin Thery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Eric,
While testing the current network namespace stuff merged in net-2.6.25,
I bumped into the following problem with the /proc/net/ entries.
It doesn't always display the actual data of the current namespace,
but sometime
Hi all,
i have doubt in e1000_io_write().
void
e1000_io_write(struct e1000_hw *hw, unsigned long port, uint32_t value)
{
outl(value, port);
}
kernel version: 2.6.12.3
Even hw structure has not been used, why it has been passed into
e1000_io_write function?
Thanks
Jeba
--
To unsubscri
David Miller wrote:
You have to be kidding, coming here for help with a nearly
4 year old kernel.
I figured it couldn't hurt to ask...if I can't ask the original authors,
who else is there?
I'd love to work on newer kernels, but we have a commitment to our
customers to support multiple rel
On Fri, 2008-11-01 at 15:24 -0200, Dzianis Kahanovich wrote:
> jamal wrote:
> > tc qdisc add dev XXX ingress
> > tc filter add dev XXX parent : protocol ip prio 5 \
> > u32 blah bleh \
> > flowid 1:12 action ipt -j mark --set-mark 13
>
> Yes, I do so. But there are simple:
> ---
> if [[ $[T
jamal wrote:
To "classid x:y" = "mark=mark&x|y" ("classid :y" = "-j MARK --set-mark y", etc).
--- linux-2.6.23-gentoo-r2/net/sched/Kconfig
+++ linux-2.6.23-gentoo-r2.fixed/net/sched/Kconfig
@@ -222,6 +222,16 @@
[..]
skb->tc_index = TC_H_MIN(res.classid);
+#ifdef CONFIG
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:51:11PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:10:42AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > Eric Dumazet wrote, On 01/09/2008 11:37 AM:
> > ...
> > > [NET] ROUTE: fix rcu_dereference() uses in /proc/net/rt_cache
> > ...
> > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.
Patrick McHardy wrote:
--- linux-2.6.23-gentoo-r2/net/sched/sch_ingress.c
+++ linux-2.6.23-gentoo-r2.fixed/net/sched/sch_ingress.c
@@ -161,2 +161,5 @@
skb->tc_index = TC_H_MIN(res.classid);
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_SCH_INGRESS_TC2MARK
+skb->mark =
(skb->mark&(res.classid>>16)
On Friday 11 January 2008, Ishizaki Kou wrote:
> This patch fixes initialization of "aneg_count" and "medium" fields in
> spider_net_card to make spidernet driver correctly sets "link status".
>
> Signed-off-by: Kou Ishizaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Ishizaki,
Linas has left the company and is no l
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:17:02 +0100), Andi Kleen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > from Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
> > (aka "class-E") addre
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:37:42PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:30:10AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > It looks like I'm really too lazy and/or these selfdocumenting features
> > of RCU are a bit overrated: one can never be sure which pointer is
> > really RCU prote
In 802.11n, there is a case where multiple data frames are received
aggregated into a single frame (A-MSDU).
Currently, we copy each of these frames out into their own skb, but
because of the alignment with that etc. I started to think that we could
simply pass up a clone of the original skb with
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:38:52PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:11:40AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > So, IOW: strictly speaking you are right, r can't change here, but I
> > meant r vs. the returned value! Before the patch the returned value
> > couldn't be NULL u
Hello everybody.
AFAIK ipsec policy aren't related to routing
tables: if there is an ipsec policy to deliver
traffic, for example, from 192.168.0.0/16 to
10.0.0.0/8, xfrm will eat the packets ignoring
the routing table.
Here is the ipsec gateway schema:
[-] cisco ISP router default gateway
Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> from Vince Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This set of diffs modify the 2.6.20 kernel to enable use of the 240/4
> (aka "class-E") address space as consistent with the Internet Draft
> draft-fuller-240space-00.txt.
Wouldn't it be wise to at least wait for
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No IRQ balancing should be done at all for networking device
> interrupts, with zero exceptions. It destroys performance.
Does irqbalanced need to be taught about this? And how about the
initial balancing, so that each network card gets assigned to one
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:30:10AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> It looks like I'm really too lazy and/or these selfdocumenting features
> of RCU are a bit overrated: one can never be sure which pointer is
> really RCU protected without checking a few places?! So, after looking
> at this rt_ca
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:11:40AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> So, IOW: strictly speaking you are right, r can't change here, but I
> meant r vs. the returned value! Before the patch the returned value
> couldn't be NULL unless all elements of the list were looped. After
> this patch it seem
Hi All,
The existing algorithm works in eql bonding driver works based on
priority of each slaves. The priority has been assigned as speed of the
particular line. The current problem is, all the slaves didn't get the
chance as best slave for the transmission.
Will the round robin algorithm for se
On Friday 11 January 2008 02:51:58 Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> What about the following patch:
Looks correct and in fact pretty orthodox.
I've folded this in, thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:22:42PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:13:23 +0100
>
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 07:14:43PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
...
> I've removed the warning and made the branch back to 'again'
> unconditional a
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 17:35 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> The regression is:
> 1)stoakley with 2 qual-core processors: 11%;
> 2)Tulsa with 4 dual-core(+hyperThread) processors:13%;
I have new update on this issue and also cc to netdev maillist.
Thank David Miller for pointing me the netdev maillis
On Friday 11 January 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 11 January 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Again, I don't particularly care about what they're named, but the whole
> > point is
> >
> > #include
> >
> > if you want the subset and
> >
> > #include
> >
> > if you want the whole
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:11:40AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> So, IOW: strictly speaking you are right, r can't change here, but I
> meant r vs. the returned value! Before the patch the returned value
> couldn't be NULL unless all elements of the list were looped. After
...even more stric
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:32:28PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
> - cleaned up largely against sparse, checkpatch
largely means not completely, right? Please make sure there's no sparse
warnings left at least. checkpatch is not that criticial, but it would
be good to have an explanation for everythin
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:30:10AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:00:20AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:10:42AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems this optimization could've a side effect: if during such a
> > > loop updates are
On Friday 11 January 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> all this stuff is ABI constants, and the only reason glibc
> >> doesn't use them is that glibc prefers to use enums over #defines.
> >
> > a proper libc defines things in their headers according to the POSIX
> > specs rat
New info. Wait some time and reset oprifile statistic (i think info
abount ipt_unregister_table its get what run some script... ).
That clear info after add FILTER:
First PC
CPU: P4 / Xeon, speed 3409.96 MHz (estimated)
Counted GLOBAL_POWER_EVENTS events (time during which processor is not
stop
Hello all.
I N days try to tune system for best performance and see strange thing.
Have N htb classes
root class is HTB. param: default 7 (if not classify - go to 1:7)
filters classify only mached ip. others go to HTB DEFAULT rule.
run oprofile:
First pc (htb and iptables compile in kernel):
CP
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 11:00:20AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:10:42AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> >
> > It seems this optimization could've a side effect: if during such a
> > loop updates are done, and r is seen !NULL during while() check, but
> > NULL after rcu_dere
Mike Frysinger wrote:
all this stuff is ABI constants, and the only reason glibc
doesn't use them is that glibc prefers to use enums over #defines.
a proper libc defines things in their headers according to the POSIX specs
rather than relying on others to do it for them. if you want to argue
91 matches
Mail list logo
