On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 02:33:18PM -0700, - wrote:
Kernel version 2.6.20.4 works. What I'm experiencing is a kernel panic as
soon as the first received packet comes in via the sis900 ethernet
interface. The machine is locked up and part of the kernel panic message
is lost as it has
As mentioned in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5015
The helptext implies that this is on by default.
This may be true on some distros (Fedora/RHEL have it enabled
in /etc/sysctl.conf), but the kernel defaults to it off.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/net
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 02:51:35PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:
netif_poll_enable can only be called if you've previously called
netif_poll_disable. Otherwise a poll might already be in action
and you may get a crash like this.
Removing the call to netif_poll_enable in
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 05:58:27PM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
This probably doesn't solve the latter bug.
The code you reference isn't there in the kernel tested in that bug
(2.6.21) In 2.6.21, netif_poll_enable is only called from
e1000_up(), not e1000_open()
Yes we need a
scc_rxint doesn't call this function at all.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8146
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c b/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c
index 6fdaad5..30bed2a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/hamradio/scc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/hamradio
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8160
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/via-velocity.c b/drivers/net/via-velocity.c
index 25b75b6..b670b97 100644
--- a/drivers/net/via-velocity.c
+++ b/drivers/net/via-velocity.c
@@ -1562,7 +1562,7 @@ static void
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 06:04:21PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
There _should_ be some #ifdeffable thing which is being passed to cpp when
we run sparse (but I'm not sure what it is).
#ifdef __CHECKER__
(See include/linux/compiler.h, this is how we implement __user friends)
Dave
Seen during boot of a 2.6.18rc5-git1 based kernel.
Dave
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.17-1.2608.fc6 #1
---
swapper/0 is trying to acquire
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
Refine cb cleaning debug printout and print out all cleaned cbs' status. Add
debug flag for EEPROM csum failures that were overridden by the user.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Auke Kok
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 05:40:34PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
+ add_taint(TAINT_MACHINE_CHECK);
I object to this flag being abused this way.
A corrupt EEPROM on a network card has
=
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
-
inconsistent {softirq-on-R} - {in-softirq-W} usage.
swapper/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[2]:HE1:SE0] takes:
(police_lock){-+--}, at: [f8d304fd] tcf_police_destroy+0x24/0x8f [act_police]
{softirq-on-R} state
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
jamal wrote:
Yes, that looks plausible. Can you try making those changes and see if
the warning is gone?
I think this points to a bigger brokeness caused by the move of
dev-qdisc to
sfuzz.c (google for it if you don't have it already) used to
run forver (or until I got bored and ctrl-c'd it) as long
as it didn't trigger an oops or the like in 2.6.17
Running it against 2.6.18, I notice that it runs for a while,
and then gets totally wedged. It doesn't respond to any signals,
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c b/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c
index db23249..1eae16b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c
@@ -2903,7 +2903,7 @@ #endif
dev = alloc_etherdev(sizeof(struct sbmac_softc
With 2.6.17-rc3, my E1000 won't get a dhcp lease.
Looking at tcpdump and ifconfig output, it's easy to see why.
It's recieving packets, but the packets transmitted field
of ifconfig never increases.
The last version I have built that worked ok was 2.6.17rc2-git3
NIC is ..
03:0e.0 Ethernet
So I pushed out an update for Fedora Core 5 users yesterday
that moved the kernel from 2.6.16.9 to 2.6.16.13.
I've since heard My network performance is awful, and worse
yet, some apps seem broken as in the report below.
Anyone have any ideas ?
Dave
--
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 05:19:15PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
So I pushed out an update for Fedora Core 5 users yesterday
that moved the kernel from 2.6.16.9 to 2.6.16.13.
I've since heard My network performance is awful, and worse
yet, some apps seem broken as in the report below.
Further
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 04:25:46PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
That being said, the first thing that should be tried is reverting
the above mentioned change and see if the problem goes away. If
so, then we need to investigate what the bandwidth delay product is
for the connection, and
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 10:47:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.17-rc6/2.6.17-rc6-mm1/
Just spotted this typo in a new option.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- rc6mm1/net/Kconfig~ 2006-06-07 14:19:44.0
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:50:10PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Remove Prism II IDs from the orinoco driver since now we have a separate
driver for them (HostAP). Additionally, kill orinoco_{pci,plx,nortel}
completely, since they only exist to support Prism cards.
No attempt was made to
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 02:08:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:50:10PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Remove Prism II IDs from the orinoco driver since now we have a separate
driver for them (HostAP). Additionally, kill orinoco_{pci,plx,nortel}
completely
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 06:27:19PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 02:08:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 08:50:10PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Remove Prism II IDs from the orinoco driver since now we have a
separate
driver for them
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 06:31:40PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 06:40:54PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Under hostap, it's a brick, it won't even report any scanning results.
Did you switch it into managed mode? The hostap driver, iirc, defaults
to running
As we're already dereferencing dev a few lines above, if this
check could ever trigger, we'd have already oopsed.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c~ 2006-06-11 20:24:41.0
-0400
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/tulip/uli526x.c 2006
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 06:39:58PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
FWIW, I think we've experienced a similar situation like this in the
past in the networking land and the consensus was to completely remove
the other driver. I'm referring to e100/eepro100, of course.
The difference with
Has anything changed recently in how e1000 handles checksum
offload ? My desktop box has been rock solid for months,
but the last few weeks I've noticed a lot of timeouts
over http etc.
Further investigation with ethereal showed incorrect tcp checksums
on certain packets.
Disabling rx/tx offload
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:07:20AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anything changed recently in how e1000 handles checksum
offload ? My desktop box has been rock solid for months,
but the last few weeks I've noticed a lot of timeouts
over http etc
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:25:14AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 04:21:32PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
Hmm, that does make sense.
Maybe the problem exists elsewhere, as thinking more about it,
it's only certain sites that seem to have the problem
(I notice
On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 02:08:28PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jiri Benc wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:38:37 -0500, Joseph Jezak wrote:
We're not writing an entire stack. We're writing a layer that sits in
between the current ieee80211 stack that's already present in the kernel
and
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:59:30PM -0800, Linux Kernel wrote:
tree 987cfbd2134b82bea55c55fa17bd70d29df70458
parent 0e670506668a43e1355b8f10c33d081a676bd521
author Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 07 Dec 2005 07:01:49 -0800
committer Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 13 Dec 2005
Our daily build-system spat this out about 2.6.15-git2
WARNING:
/usr/src/build/676459-ia64/install/lib/modules/2.6.15-1.1830_FC5/kernel/net/dccp/dccp_ipv6.ko
needs unknown symbol csum_ipv6_magic
WARNING:
We got this in Fedora bugzilla from a user running a 2.6.15-rc7-git2 vintage
kernel. This seemed important enough to warrant a closer look by someone
familiar
with recent networking changes in case this hasn't been reported/fixed yet.
Dave
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 08:13:54PM
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:56:26AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
Nack. changing module tables in one driver depending on another driver
is always bogus. Better send a patch to udev/modutils/whatever
maintainers
to prefer one over the others.
Is there really any such stuff
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 07:32:56PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
The only supported combinations are distributions with the kernels they
ship.
I think you're being unreasonable here.
Absolutely. The statement is also completely false.
Fedora rebases to a new point release shortly
I managed to get a box running 2.6.16rc1-git4 to spit this out..
Dave
UDP: bad checksum. From 192.168.79.115:43047 to 192.168.76.106:61494 ulen 1083
Badness in dst_release at include/net/dst.h:154 (Not tainted)
[c029d580] __kfree_skb+0x36/0xdd
[c02ba807]
I've had a box being tortured with random junk packets (created with isic)
for a few days, and it spat this out last night..
Feb 1 04:28:09 trogdor kernel: Slab corruption: (Not tainted) start=cefc8a9c,
len=244
Feb 1 04:28:09 trogdor kernel: Redzone: 0x5a2cf071/0x5a2cf071.
Feb 1 04:28:09
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:08:33PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
I managed to get a box running 2.6.16rc1-git4 to spit this out..
Dave
UDP: bad checksum. From 192.168.79.115:43047 to 192.168.76.106:61494 ulen
1083
Badness in dst_release at include/net/dst.h:154
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:49:29PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:30:28 -0500
Here's a second flavour.
Can you git bisect to figure out when this problem started
to occur?
I'll give it a try sometime soon, though I'm up
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:35:01PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
If you are on a hostile network, or are running protocol tests, you can
easily get the logged swamped by messages about bad UDP and ICMP packets.
This turns those messages off unless a config option is enabled.
packets.
This turns those messages off unless a config option is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NETDEBUG should print out something by default.
We should fix the NETDEBUG() users. Dave Jones recently fixed
a case in IGMP, for example.
It should
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 04:40:00PM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
On Wednesday 18 October 2006 01:12, Daniel Drake wrote:
Larry Finger pointed out a problem with my ieee80211 IV/ICV stripping
patch,
which I forgot about. Sorry about that.
The patch readds the frame_ctl assignment
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 01:25:32PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:25:27 -0700
Sorry, but why should we treat out-of-tree vendor
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.20-1.2933.fc6debug #1
---
swapper/0 is trying to acquire lock:
(tbl-lock){-+-+}, at: [c05d5664] neigh_lookup+0x43/0xa2
but task
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 06:10:42PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 10:44 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Dave, there is a classic AB BA deadlock here.
We should break the dependency like this.
Could someone who
I booted up 2.6.21rc7 without an ethernet cable plugged in,
and noticed this..
e1000: :02:00.0: e1000_probe: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid
e1000: probe of :02:00.0 failed with error -5
I plugged a cable in, did rmmod e1000;modprobe e1000, and got this..
e1000: :02:00.0:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:14:40PM -0700, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: laptops with e1000: lockups
References :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229603
Submitter : Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handled-By : Jesse Brandeburg [EMAIL
This seems to be trivial to trigger.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/atm/signaling.c~2006-02-11 19:20:09.0
-0500
+++ linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/atm/signaling.c 2006-02-11 19:21:30.0
-0500
@@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ static void sigd_put_skb
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 06:11:48PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
needs quotes: GPL
Indeed.
Missing license tag.
I've assumed this is GPL. (It could also use a MODULE_AUTHOR)
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/802/p8023.c~2006-02-11 21:15
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:37:19PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:17:38 -0500
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 06:11:48PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
needs quotes: GPL
Indeed.
Dave, please type make patches you
Triggered whilst running a socket stress test.
(The tainted flag came from 'p8023')
Dave
Feb 11 21:52:00 trogdor kernel: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address 01b0
Feb 11 21:52:00 trogdor kernel: printing eip:
Feb 11 21:52:00 trogdor kernel:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:46:43AM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Triggered whilst running a socket stress test.
(The tainted flag came from 'p8023')
does 2.6.15-1.1929_FC5smp equals 2.6.16-rc2-git?
yes.
How do you produce these oopses, because I've never seen them.
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:19:36AM +0100, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Dave,
Triggered whilst running a socket stress test.
(The tainted flag came from 'p8023')
does 2.6.15-1.1929_FC5smp equals 2.6.16-rc2-git?
yes.
not additional Fedora specific patches? It is
suggested that to me off-list, but I hadn't got around to it yet.
Looks good to me.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dave
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:35:05PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:24:23 -0500
This seems to be trivial to trigger.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied, thanks.
I did some more testing with this.
Rate
We've already dereferenced 'np' a dozen
times at this point, so it's safe to say it's not null.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c~ 2006-03-06 02:22:05.0
-0500
+++ linux-2.6.15.noarch/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c 2006-03-06 02:23
Variation on a theme, with same result - double free of same object.
Coverity #950
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_seal.c~ 2006-03-06
04:23:05.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_krb5_seal.c 2006-03-06
04:23
We're leaking an skb in a failure path in this function.
Coverity #632
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/drivers/net/tun.c~2006-03-08 22:43:54.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/net/tun.c 2006-03-08 22:46:16.0 -0500
@@ -249,8 +249,11 @@ static
: undefined
reference to `wireless_rtnetlink_get'
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.16.noarch/drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig~ 2006-03-24
18:01:46.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.16.noarch/drivers/net/wireless/Kconfig2006-03-24
18:02:03.0 -0500
@@ -27,6 +27,7
/selinux/xfrm.c:317: error: 'struct sec_path' has no member named 'x'
Does this look sane ?
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.16.noarch/security/selinux/xfrm.c~2006-04-02
23:27:07.0 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.16.noarch/security/selinux/xfrm.c 2006-04-02 23:27
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:45:07AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
I've recently been noticing nasty messages come out of FC5:
sony:/home/akpm# service iptables stop
Flushing firewall rules: [ OK ]
Setting chains to policy ACCEPT: filter
Turning up the warnings on gcc makes it emit warnings
about the placement of 'inline' in function declarations.
Here's everything that was under net/
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c b/net/bluetooth/hidp/core.c
index 4c914df..ecfe8da 100644
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
On 29/06/06, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
This looks very strange.
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6c07
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 10:39:33PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
This looks very strange.
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 6b6b6c07
Looks like a use after free.
printing eip:
c0138594
*pde=
Oops: 0002 [#1]
4K_STACK PREEMPT SMP
last
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 01:14:30PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
Ar Gwe, 2006-06-30 am 11:54 +0200, ysgrifennodd Arjan van de Ven:
another quick hack is to check for vesa lb... eg if pci is present, skip
this thing entirely :)
Not really, many people made VLB/PCI combo boards.
- check the
With 2.6.18rc1 + a selection of the lockdep tweaks found so far,
midnight commander makes the kernel unhappy.
Dave
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
Another one triggered by a Fedora-development user..
e100: eth1: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, half-duplex
=
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
-
ipcalc/1671
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
---
gnome-settings-/3278 is trying to acquire lock:
(sk_lock-AF_INET){--..}, at: [8022800c] tcp_sendmsg+0x1f/0xb1a
but task
Not sure if this one got reported/fixed yet, as I was running
a kernel from sometime last week..
Dave
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
---
net/sched/sch_htb.c: In function 'htb_change_class':
net/sched/sch_htb.c:1605: error: expected ';' before 'do_gettimeofday'
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.17.noarch/net/sched/sch_htb.c~2006-07-15 03:40:14.0
-0400
+++ linux-2.6.17.noarch/net/sched/sch_htb.c
mainline, and backed out numerous fixes
made to it in the mainline kernel. It's a huge effort to get the 'good bits'
out of that patch, and letting it die is the only sensible solution IMO.
ACKed-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+SK98LIN GIGABBIT ETHERNET DRIVER
typo :-)
Dave
2.6.18rc2-gitSomething on my firewall box just triggered this..
Dave
[515613.791771] ===
[515613.841467] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[515613.873284]
Wow. Nearly 400 lines of debug spew, from a simple 'ifup eth1'.
Dave
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth1: link is not ready
eth1: New link status: Disconnected (0002)
==
[ INFO: hard-safe - hard-unsafe lock order detected ]
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Could we please just get rid of the wireless extensions over netlink code
again? It doesn't help to solve anything and just creates a bigger mess
to untangle when switching to a fully fledged wireless stack.
If we're going
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:58:00AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:54:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is another one of those nasty buggers;
From a recent rc3-git kernel.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
---BeginMessage---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201560
We've just added an implicit declaration in the latest tree..
net/ipx/af_ipx.c: In function 'ipx_rcv':
net/ipx/af_ipx.c:1648: error: implicit declaration of function 'ipxhdr'
(Yes, my builds fail on -Werror-implicit, so that things like this get caught
early)
Probably something simple like a
config.h is automatically included by kbuild these days.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_sip.c~2006-08-09
22:18:48.0 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_sip.c 2006-08-09
22:18:53.0 -0400
@@ -8,7
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 09:04:38PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 22:21:16 -0400
config.h is automatically included by kbuild these days.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied to net-2.6.19, thanks Dave
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 03:25:58PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
index 16db3e1..8fd9b32 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco.h
@@ -135,11 +135,9 @@ extern irqreturn_t
of bugs seemed easy to automate. This is one of them
I found where it looks like this semicolon is not valid.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yikes! Makes you want to audit the entire tree for these
things :-)))
Indeed. Here's another one.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones
A Fedora users reported this against our 2.6.23-rc3 build
Dave
NET: Registered protocol family 10
lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.1.3 (June 13, 2007)
bonding: MII link monitoring set to 100 ms
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bond0: link is not ready
bonding:
Last night, I hit this bug during boot up..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100-2.jpg
This morning, I got a mail from a Fedora user of the same
.23-rc8 based kernel that has seen a different trace
also implicating e100..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100.jpg
It may be that the two
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:10:11AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Last night, I hit this bug during boot up..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100-2.jpg
This morning, I got a mail from a Fedora user of the same
.23-rc8 based kernel that has seen a different trace
Reported by a Fedora user this morning.
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.1.3 (June 13, 2007)
bonding: MII link monitoring set to 100 ms
ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bond0: link is not ready
bonding: bond0: Adding slave eth0.
e100: eth0: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex
bonding: bond0:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:58:27PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
Last night, I hit this bug during boot up..
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/junk/e100-2.jpg
This morning, I got a mail from a Fedora user of the same
.23-rc8 based
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:10:34AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
Herbert Xu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 08:36:38PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
The e1000 changes you reference above, is this the changeset you mean?
commit 416b5d10afdc797c21c457ade3714e8f2f75edd9
Author: Auke Kok [EMAIL
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:59:59AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
David Mack wrote:
It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
Huge thanks and great work, guys.
DaveJ, I didn't push anything upstream. Can you verify this now
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:40:01PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
In any case, this patch should not be merged. We often send it around to
users to
debug their issue in case it involves eeproms, but merging it will just
conceal
the real issue and all of a sudden a flood of people stop
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:03:38PM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:40:01PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
In any case, this patch should not be merged. We often send it around
to users to
debug their issue in case it involves eeproms
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 03:43:06AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
There seems to be rough consensus that the kernel currently has too many
exported symbols. A lot of these exports are generally usable utility
functions or important driver interfaces; but another large part are
functions
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:25:33AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
1) Why is everyone so concerned that export symbol space is large?
- does it cost cpu or running memory?
- does it cause bugs?
- or are you just worried about evil modules?
To clarify something here, by
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:09:42PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:00:37PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:25:33AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
1) Why is everyone so concerned that export symbol space is large?
- does it cost
the
alloc_tbufs(), but I feel if a real interrupt occured, this diff would
stand more chance of doing the right thing.
Comments?
Dave
Delay irq registration until after we've allocated ring buffers,
otherwise DEBUG_SHIRQ will complain.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:53:43PM +0100, Thomas Klein wrote:
+static void ehea_update_adapter_handles(struct ehea_adapter *adapter)
+{
+int i, k;
+int j = 0;
+
+memset(adapter-res_handles, sizeof(adapter-res_handles), 0);
arguments wrong way around.
Dave
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431038 has some more info,
but the trace is below...
I'll get an rc3 kernel built and ask the user to retest, but in case this
isn't a known problem, I'm forwarding this here.
Dave
Feb 24 17:53:21 cirithungol kernel:
I taught Trinity about NETLINK_LISTEN_ALL_NSID and NETLINK_LIST_MEMBERSHIPS
yesterday, and this evening, this fell out..
general protection fault: [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
CPU: 1 PID: 9130 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 4.1.0-gelk-debug+ #1
Workqueue: sock_diag_events
Just hit this weird problem where I can ssh into a machine once,
then after logging out, subsequent ssh connections hang.
The client side looks like..
13:39:06.307781 IP wopr.kernelslacker.org.43982 gelk.kernelslacker.org.ssh:
Flags [S], seq 319726787, win 29200, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 01:46:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
Just hit this weird problem where I can ssh into a machine once,
then after logging out, subsequent ssh connections hang.
The client side looks like..
derp, missed half the tcpdump capture on both sides, and now
I can't
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:24:21AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Just hit this weird problem where I can ssh into a machine once,
then after logging out, subsequent ssh connections hang.
Your tcpdumps look one way only.
ok hit it again, so let's try again...
client side:
I've got a machine with an onboard NIC that reproduces a hardware
hang every time I do an rsync to it.
[ 488.752630] e1000e :00:19.0 eth0: Detected Hardware Unit Hang:
TDH 27
TDT 34
next_to_use 34
next_to_clean23
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
