On 02/04/2018 10:19 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 18:56:14 +0100
> Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
>> Don't get me wrong, I'm not at all against such tool or test, I think
>> it's a great idea and needed. I just think that tools/lib/bpf/ is not
>> the right place to put it into
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 18:56:14 +0100
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, I'm not at all against such tool or test, I think
> it's a great idea and needed. I just think that tools/lib/bpf/ is not
> the right place to put it into lib directory. Right now, as you say,
> it's a mixture of examp
On 02/01/2018 03:41 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 11:59:29 +0100
> Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
>> Hi Jesper,
>>
>> On 01/27/2018 06:26 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>> While playing with using libbpf for the Suricata project, we had
>>> issues LLVM >= 4.0.1 generating E
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 11:59:29 +0100
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hi Jesper,
>
> On 01/27/2018 06:26 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > While playing with using libbpf for the Suricata project, we had
> > issues LLVM >= 4.0.1 generating ELF files that could not be loaded
> > with libbpf (tools/lib/b
Hi Jesper,
On 01/27/2018 06:26 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> While playing with using libbpf for the Suricata project, we had
> issues LLVM >= 4.0.1 generating ELF files that could not be loaded
> with libbpf (tools/lib/bpf/).
>
> During the troubleshooting phase, I wrote a test program and
