Hi Ladislav
Thanks for the asnwer.
I've realized that leaf stmt in augment is parsed as data-def-stmt, not
short-case-stmt (even though it is augmented to choice),
so all is valid according to RFC6020.
Best Regards
Martin
Od: Ladislav Lhotka
IMHO, there should a YANG Construct should allow modules to be reused within
another module with a restriction of looping.
When the YANG modules organized at controller, or any manager, re use of
grouping or a particular XPath mount makes life static in YANG.
Br,
Ambika Prasad Tripathy
On Aug 27, 2015:1:59 PM, at 1:59 PM, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Rob Shakir r...@rob.sh
mailto:r...@rob.sh wrote:
Andy,
Apologies, I don’t understand how your mail answers the questions that I
posed.
On August 27, 2015 at 12:25:20,
Hi Andy,
I’m struggling with this debate.
On August 27, 2015 at 13:59:55, Andy Bierman (a...@yumaworks.com) wrote:
Sorry -- are you suggesting that maybe /device adds no value beyond /?
If so, I agree.
No, I am suggesting that should understand what the alternatives to solving
issues are,
Hi Lada,
Thanks for the reply.
On August 27, 2015 at 11:21:18, Ladislav Lhotka (lho...@nic.cz) wrote:
This one is actually easy to explain, exactly as the top-level container
interfaces in ietf-interfaces: it is a courtesy to XML encoding.
Apologies, I’m not sure my question was clear enough.
Hi Andy,
On August 27, 2015 at 14:48:58, Andy Bierman (a...@yumaworks.com) wrote:
Did you really think that just because we created a nice DML that
somehow you would not need to know about the topic of your YANG module?
I actually have heard this complaint from some people. Great. How does
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Rob Shakir r...@rob.sh wrote:
Hi Andy,
I’m struggling with this debate.
On August 27, 2015 at 13:59:55, Andy Bierman (a...@yumaworks.com) wrote:
Sorry -- are you suggesting that maybe /device adds no value beyond /?
If so, I agree.
No, I am suggesting
On Aug 27, 2015:2:29 PM, at 2:29 PM, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Nadeau Thomas tnad...@lucidvision.com
mailto:tnad...@lucidvision.com wrote:
On Aug 27, 2015:1:59 PM, at 1:59 PM, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com
mailto:a...@yumaworks.com
Martin,
Apologies, I switched to a new client and, wow, yes, it's not readable.
I reported a bug and switched clients again... I *hope* this one is more
readable (and it was when I checked last).
I'll put aside questions of whether the questions I'm asking are
completely fair. Apologies.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Rob Shakir r...@rob.sh wrote:
Hi Andy,
On August 27, 2015 at 14:48:58, Andy Bierman (a...@yumaworks.com) wrote:
Did you really think that just because we created a nice DML that
somehow you would not need to know about the topic of your YANG module?
I
Hi Martin,
BTW, are these interim meeting
minutes available somewhere? This is not the first time I had to
search old emails in order to find interim minutes.
I just sent email to the WG chairs alias asking about this. I'm proposing
that minutes for interim meetings be linked off the Minutes
Hi,
I started a new subject line because the way logical vs. physical systems
are managed is a separate issue from the others.
+--rw device
+--rw logical-network-elements
+--rw logical-network-element* [network-element-id]
+--rw network-element-id
Yes. The one thing I would add is that validation of the mounted data can
occur in its original path (the authoritative owner (in the distributed case)).
It should not be required to do this validation with the chrooted path,
although that path can be used by other data nodes that refer to /
Hi,
发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Andy Bierman
发送时间: 2015年8月28日 0:25
收件人: Rob Shakir
抄送: netmod@ietf.org
主题: Re: [netmod] Motivations for Structuring Models
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Rob Shakir r...@rob.shmailto:r...@rob.sh
wrote:
NETMOD,
One of the chairs encouraged
Alexander Clemm (alex) a...@cisco.com wrote:
- As Martin mentioned, clearly by allowing to mount you are
decoupling schema information and instance population. Regarding
the issue of validation, this can be addressed by several ways.
I think that the mount point effectively works as a
On 08/26/2015 03:48 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Lou Berger lber...@labn.net
mailto:lber...@labn.net wrote:
Tom,
On 8/26/2015 9:34 AM, Nadeau Thomas wrote:
...
This is exactly what I want to get on the table.
So taking a
On 08/27/2015 02:42 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
The flat sea of YANG modules brings a different set of issues and I
am unsure what they are;
This is main problem I have. What the heck is the problem we are trying
to fix?
The first, but not only problem, is today's ~200 top level
17 matches
Mail list logo
