All,
Regarding the oddity in the body of the notification message from the RFC
Errata System (sent 2016-09-05), i.e., the replacement of "$0" with
"RFCORIGINAL_TEXT", we will fix this error in the mail generation system.
As far as the erratum itself, we note that it is accurately displayed (and
Hi,
I am not in favor of changing when-stmt so it works like must-stmt.
I prefer it work as designed. It is like choice-stmt, where a new case
will cause objects from the previously selected case to be automatically
deleted.
There is no text in RFC 7950 that actually says an error is returned
if
On 09/13/2016 01:26 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
I am wondering in which cases this is useful. Consider a candidate
datastore - why would a 'when' expression have to true after each
edit? Why do we force clients to send edits
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
>
> > I am wondering in which cases this is useful. Consider a candidate
> > datastore - why would a 'when' expression have to true after each
> > edit? Why do we force clients to send edits in such a way that 'when'
> > expression
On 09/13/2016 12:57 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:42:07PM +0200, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
On 09/13/2016 10:25 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:34:33AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On 13 Sep 2016, at 09:01, Yves Beauville wrote:
Both
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:42:07PM +0200, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
> On 09/13/2016 10:25 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:34:33AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > > > On 13 Sep 2016, at 09:01, Yves Beauville
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Both RFC 6020 and RFC 795
On 09/13/2016 10:25 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:34:33AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On 13 Sep 2016, at 09:01, Yves Beauville wrote:
Both RFC 6020 and RFC 7950 are providing the same requirement in section
'Payload Parsing':
o If data for a node tagged wit
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:34:33AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >
> > > On 13 Sep 2016, at 09:01, Yves Beauville wrote:
> > >
> > > Both RFC 6020 and RFC 7950 are providing the same requirement in section
> > > 'Payload Parsing':
> > > o If data for a node
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:34:33AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> >
> > > On 13 Sep 2016, at 09:01, Yves Beauville
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Both RFC 6020 and RFC 7950 are providing the same requir
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 09:34:33AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 13 Sep 2016, at 09:01, Yves Beauville wrote:
> >
> > Both RFC 6020 and RFC 7950 are providing the same requirement in section
> > 'Payload Parsing':
> > o If data for a node tagged with "when" is present, and the "when
Thank you Lada. It makes perfect sense now.
Yves
On 9/13/2016 9:34 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On 13 Sep 2016, at 09:01, Yves Beauville wrote:
Hi Andi, Xiang, Juergen and Lada,
Thank you all for clarifying.
The scope of my original question was the context for evaluating a 'when' expression
> On 13 Sep 2016, at 09:01, Yves Beauville wrote:
>
> Hi Andi, Xiang, Juergen and Lada,
>
> Thank you all for clarifying.
>
> The scope of my original question was the context for evaluating a 'when'
> expression during 'payload parsing' of an RPC.
>
> Both RFC 6020 and RFC 7950 are providi
> On 12 Sep 2016, at 18:33, Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> > On 12 Sep 2016, at 15:33, Juergen Schoenwaelder
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think Section 8.3.3. provides an answer:
> >
> > When datastore processing is complete, t
Hi Andi, Xiang, Juergen and Lada,
Thank you all for clarifying.
The scope of my original question was the context for evaluating a
'when' expression during 'payload parsing' of an RPC.
Both RFC 6020 and RFC 7950 are providing the same requirement in section
'Payload Parsing':
o If data f
14 matches
Mail list logo
