[netmod] New Version Notification for draft-bertz-netmod-commonaugment-01.txt

All, This updates some compilation errors (in the examples) found in 00 Lyle A new version of I-D, draft-bertz-netmod-commonaugment-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Lyle Bertz and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-bertz-netmod-commonaugment Revision: 01 Title:

Re: [netmod] draft netmod charter update proposal

Hi Lou, > The charters from the last couple of years don't have the intended status -- at least the ones we checked. > I actually feel pretty strongly about this (which of course can be easily overruled by our AD). It's my experience that premature discussions on intended status, i.e., >

[netmod] FW: draft netmod charter update proposal

Hi Lou, no issue at all, we can get in sync again. As I see in exchanged mails we discussed to not hurry and to plan a joint session. AFAIK the timing between 7950bis and NETCONF documents as well as the content split is still subject to finalize. It is not clear yet how and where to address

Re: [netmod] New I-D Submission: draft-bertz-netmod-commonaugment

Understood. Let's discuss at the meeting though. This was a significant issue in the development of the IETF DMM FPC yang files and our open source project. I am open to this going in the proper direction wherever that is but wanted to bring the issue and a possible solution to the table.

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-entity-02.txt

"Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE)" wrote: > So; to make this work the YANG property of the parent leaf in the config > data tree should be set to false to allow a reference to hardware-state, > correct? It would be: leaf parent { type leafref { path

Re: [netmod] stable reference for tree diagram notation

Original Message - From: "Andy Bierman" To: "Kent Watsen" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 7:14 PM > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > > I think we can allow both and leave it to

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-entity-02.txt

So; to make this work the YANG property of the parent leaf in the config data tree should be set to false to allow a reference to hardware-state, correct? Regards, Bart Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 02:48:15PM +, Bogaert, Bart

Re: [netmod] stable reference for tree diagram notation

> On 8 Mar 2017, at 20:34, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:56:20PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: >> >> This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but also this >> likely mimics what happened in reality (start with

Re: [netmod] stable reference for tree diagram notation

On 08/03/2017 20:57, Kent Watsen wrote: This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but also this likely mimics what happened in reality (start with `pyang -f tree` and then manually edit from there). What do you think? Manually edited tree diagrams? I hope not. Perhaps we