> On 8 Mar 2017, at 20:34, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 06:56:20PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: >> >> This way, reader can focus more quickly on the diffs, but also this >> likely mimics what happened in reality (start with `pyang -f tree` >> and then manually edit from there). What do you think? >> > > Manually edited tree diagrams? I hope not. Perhaps we should have text > saying that tree diagrams are expected to be generated by tools and > that they are expected to be consistent with the model (and hence they > need to be updated with every change, hence usage of tools is a damn > good idea).
Tools typically have options so even with their use the output needn't always be the same (for example, types and leafref pointers may be present or not). Lada > > [I thought this is obvious but perhaps this is not.] > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
