[netmod] FW: NomCom 2015: Call for nominations

All, Please see below the Call for Nominations from NomCom 2015. Please help NomCom and the IETF community by proposing the best candidates for the open positions. This is important for the IETF and the industry. Thanks! Kent On 9/8/15, 3:11 AM, "Benoit Claise" wrote:

[netmod] posted: draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate-00

For next week's interim meeting, but feel free to post comments before then ;) Cheers, Kent On 9/2/15, 7:55 PM, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" <internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote: > >A new version of I-D, draft-kwatsen-netmod-opstate-00.txt >has been successfully submitted

[netmod] tracking new YANG language issues

[chair hat on, changed subject line] On 9/1/15, 11:05 AM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >This is exactly the (sub) model reuse issue I was getting at in >http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg13357.html > >I think this new capability (i.e., the ability to define

Re: [netmod] Motivations for Structuring Models

Hi Martin, BTW, are these interim meeting minutes available somewhere? This is not the first time I had to search old emails in order to find interim minutes. I just sent email to the WG chairs alias asking about this. I'm proposing that minutes for interim meetings be linked off the Minutes

Re: [netmod] Y34 - root node

I like the idea of relocatable modules. It is almost to say everything defined by the IETF should be a grouping, allowing others to assemble the pieces as they see fit. I do not think it makes sense for IETF to define an uber structure, especially using a language mandating forever backwards

Re: [netmod] Agenda posted for IETF 93 meeting

All, the agenda for today's meeting has been updated. The update is as follows: * 10 min: draft-bjorklund-netmod-openconfig-reply-00 (Juergen Schoenwaelder) Thanks, Kent From: Kent Watsen kwat...@juniper.netmailto:kwat...@juniper.net Date: Friday, July 17, 2015 at 10:47 AM To: netmod

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01 (until 2015-06-29)

But don't get mw wrong, syntactically annotations would be allowed everywhere although in some places they may be a no-op. OK This is also valid, see sec. 7.7.6 in RFC 6020: snip/ I see, thanks. True, I'd rather we can find a solution for annotating XML lists. Until then, the draft

[netmod] presentations for ietf 93

The NETMOD working group is meeting twice for IETF 93 in Prague: Monday: 18:50-19:50 (1 hour) Tuesday: 15:20-17:20 (2 hours) If you would like to request a time-slot for a presentation at IETF 93, please reply by Friday, July 10th with the following information: 1) Draft title

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01 (until 2015-06-29)

Maybe I don't understand your response, but if we agree that annotations are a server-level thing (not module-specific), then I do not agree that a module's description should be able to say that an annotation should be ignored in other modules. It depends on the annotation's semantics, and

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01 (until 2015-06-29)

1. In Section 3, it says: snip/ Does this mean that the annotation A can be used by *any* module the server advertises, or just the modules that define/import annotation A? For all modules implemented by the server, no import is needed. Good, but I think the text should say this

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01 (until 2015-06-29)

[As an individual contributor] Already many comments have been made, hopefully he below comments are new: 1. In Section 3, it says: By advertising a YANG module in which metadata annotation A is defined using the md:annotation statement, a server specifies support for the syntax of

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01 (until 2015-06-29)

From: Kent Watsen kwat...@juniper.netmailto:kwat...@juniper.net Date: Monday, June 15, 2015 at 6:49 PM To: netmod@ietf.orgmailto:netmod@ietf.org netmod@ietf.orgmailto:netmod@ietf.org Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01 (until 2015-06-29) This is a notice to start

[netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01 (until 2015-06-29)

This is a notice to start a NETMOD WG last call for the document Defining and Using Metadata with YANG: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-01 Please indicate your support by Monday June 29, 2015 at 9PM EST. We are not only interested in receiving defect reports, we are

Re: [netmod] Fwd: Re: Leafref and require-instance=false

I think the two leafs are coupled through the path statement and so the values of both should conform to the same type. If I extend Balazs¹ example with uint8 and 1..10 range: 1. Would a leafref value of 256 be acceptable? 2. How about foo? I agree it doesn't makes sense, but is the

Re: [netmod] scheduling interim meetings

There has only been one response so far. Please respond by tomorrow if interested in having time during an interim meeting. Thanks, Kent On 5/22/15, 5:39 PM, Kent Watsen kwat...@juniper.net wrote: Following up on https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg12549.html, and also

<    5   6   7   8   9   10