Hi all,
FWIW, the proposed updates are now available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-netmod-rfc8407bis/
Cheers,
Med & Qin
> -Message d'origine-
> De : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> Envoyé : mardi 11 avril 2023 08:39
> À : 'Jürgen Schönwälder' ;
> 'Rob Wilton
Hi Andy,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Andy Bierman
Envoyé : mardi 11 avril 2023 16:58
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
Cc : RFC Errata System ; netmod@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8407 (7416)
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:19 PM
Hi Jürgen, all,
I started exercising the proposed approach below. A diff to track candidate
changes can be seen at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/diff?doc_1=rfc8407_2=https://boucadair.github.io/rfc8407bis/draft-boucadair-netmod-rfc8407bis.txt/.
Please note that this text is not submitted and
Hi Andy,
Which convention are you referring to?
What is cited here are excerpt from RFC8407.
Cheers,
Med
De : Andy Bierman
Envoyé : vendredi 7 avril 2023 17:36
À : RFC Errata System
Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; netmod@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8407 (7416)
Hi,
Hi Jürgen,
I think we both agree with the proposal to immediately proceed with an erratum
and handle the bis separately.
I'm more optimist here if we agree on the scope I proposed below (existing
errata, no changes to the existing guidelines, add guidelines for writing
IANA-maintained
Hi Rob, all,
I also think an errata is pragmatic here.
On the bis, I think that this can be handled separately. If we scope the bis to
be ** limited to very few items ** to cover areas where we don’t have
guidelines (e.g., add “Guidelines for IANA-Maintained Modules”), and in
addition to the
Hi Lada,
FWIW, we exercised the use of the script when preparing
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-extensions/. The source
files can be seen at:
https://github.com/boucadair/enhanced-acl-netmod/tree/main/yang.
The use of the script is ACked in both the IANA module and
Hi Benoit, Tom, all,
FWIW, I went with the following changes in
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries-07:
Added this NEW:
Examples of IANA URLs from where to retrieve the latest version of an
IANA-maintained module are: [IANA_BGP-L2_URL],
Hi Mahesh,
I also recall some of that discussion... but that is not related to this
erratum given the following prefix used in the import:
CURRENT:
import ietf-access-control-list {
prefix acl;
}
Cheers,
Med
De : Mahesh Jethanandani
Envoyé : mercredi 18 janvier 2023 19:32
À
Hi Benoît,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : netmod De la part de Benoit Claise
Envoyé : lundi 16 janvier 2023 11:49
À : Randy Presuhn ; cc...@ietf.org;
netmod@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [netmod] What to reference when importing an IANA module?
Dear all,
On 1/13/2023 9:22 PM, Randy Presuhn
Hi Randy,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : netmod De la part de Randy Presuhn
> Envoyé : vendredi 13 janvier 2023 21:22
> À : cc...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [netmod] What to reference when importing an IANA
> module?
>
> Hi -
>
...
>
> >
Hi Italo, all,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : netmod De la part de Italo Busi
> Envoyé : vendredi 13 janvier 2023 20:16
> À : Benoit Claise ; tom petch
> ; netmod@ietf.org
> Cc : cc...@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [netmod] What to reference when importing an IANA
Dear Chairs, all,
The new version include some text to address the issue raised by Italo
recently.
I think that it is time to consider adoption of this draft. Thanks.
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : internet-dra...@ietf.org
Envoyé : vendredi 13 janvier 2023 09:03
À :
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : tom petch
> Envoyé : jeudi 12 janvier 2023 14:18
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ;
> Italo Busi ;
> netmod@ietf.org
> Cc : cc...@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: What to reference when importing an IANA module?
>
> From: netmod
Hi Italo,
There is currently no explicit (*) guideline for this, but this is a point I
can add to
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries/.
Many RFCs are referencing the RFC that specified the initial version of the
IANA module: rfc9127, rfc9129, rfc9130,
Hi Eliot,
If we proceed with the current augmentation approach (rather than the bis), I
don't expect implications on other existing augmentations (e.g., mud).
Anyway, this point is now tracked at
https://github.com/oscargdd/draft-dbb-netmod-enhanced-acl/issues/4 so that we
can assess it when
Hi all,
I support adoption, obviously.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : netmod De la part de Lou Berger
> Envoyé : mardi 20 décembre 2022 00:01
> À : NETMOD Group
> Cc : NetMod WG Chairs
> Objet : [netmod] WG adoption call: draft-dbb-netmod-acl-03
>
> Hello,
>
> This
Hi Kent, all,
Samier has already replied. Please see attached.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Kent Watsen
> Envoyé : vendredi 9 décembre 2022 19:37
> À : Oscar González de Dios
> Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ;
> Lou Berger ; samier.barguil_gira...@nokia.com;
>
Hi Lou, all,
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Lou Berger
> Envoyé : lundi 5 décembre 2022 23:51
> À : OSCAR GONZALEZ DE DIOS ;
> samier.barguilgiraldo@telefonica.com; BOUCADAIR Mohamed
> INNOV/NET
> Cc : NetMod WG
Hi Michael,
You should run it with "--tree-print-structures".
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Anima De la part de Michael
> Richardson
> Envoyé : jeudi 24 novembre 2022 00:31
> À : netmod@ietf.org
> Cc : an...@ietf.org; mbj+i...@4668.se; a...@yumaworks.com
> Objet : [Anima]
Hi Qin,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Qin Wu
Envoyé : vendredi 4 novembre 2022 21:19
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; netmod@ietf.org
Objet : RE: A few comments on draft-dbb-netmod-acl
Hi, Med:
See my follow up comments marked with [Qin-1]
发件人:
Hi Qin,
Thanks for the comments.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : netmod De la part de Qin Wu
Envoyé : jeudi 27 octobre 2022 08:08
À : netmod@ietf.org
Objet : [netmod] A few comments on draft-dbb-netmod-acl
Hi, Oscar:
I have read the latest version of draft-dbb-netmod-acl, the problem
Hi all,
I like this proposal as it allows to better structure the system config. I
support adoption.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : netmod De la part de Kent Watsen
> Envoyé : lundi 17 octobre 2022 16:54
> À : netmod@ietf.org
> Objet : [netmod] Adoption call for
Hi all,
This version includes a new section that discusses what should be included in
the IANA Considerations Section. This version is also updating RFC 8126.
I have a pending comment from Lou to consider adding some text when to *not*
use an IANA-maintained module. Suggestions to address
Hi Chairs, all,
Would it be possible to consider a call for adoption for this draft or you
think that more discussion is needed?
Cheers,
Med
De : netmod De la part de mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Envoyé : mercredi 30 mars 2022 10:04
À : netmod@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [netmod] TR: New Version
Hi all,
Agree with Martin.
Here is the note I'm using in some RFCs with long trees:
The full tree diagram of the module can be generated using the
"pyang" tool [PYANG]. That tree is not included here because it is
too long (Section 3.3 of [RFC8340]). Instead, subtrees are provided
Hi Kent, all,
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Kent Watsen
> Envoyé : vendredi 8 avril 2022 20:10
> À : Qin Wu ; Benoit Claise
> ; Peng Liu ;
> Zongpeng Du ; BOUCADAIR Mohamed
> INNOV/NET
> Cc : Liang Geng ;
Hi John, all,
If we want the fix to the appendix to be immediately visible to the readers (in
the rendered version), wouldn’t be more appropriate to mark this erratum as
“verified” rather than “held for doc update”?
Cheers,
Med
De : Andy Bierman
Envoyé : jeudi 31 mars 2022 19:11
À : John R.
Hi Kent,
There are not thousands of RFCs that include a "Module Review Checklist" :-),
which is the purpose of this erratum. Thanks.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Kent Watsen
> Envoyé : jeudi 31 mars 2022 00:24
> À : RFC Errata System
> Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ;
Hi all,
FWIW, a new version with the change of a normative language is available at:
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries-03.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries/
Htmlized:
Hi Andy,
Thank you for sharing the feedback.
For the paragraph you quoted, I removed the normative language from the first
sentence.
The other parts of that paragraph are useful as they call an important aspect
that is only supported with identities + the guideline to document the
reasoning.
Hi Tom,
This part from 8407 is worth to be considered:
If an appropriate derived type exists in any standard module, such as
[RFC6991], then it SHOULD be used instead of defining a new derived
type.
Unless I'm mistaken, the idr I-D defines a new identity afi-safi which is not
Re-,
Thanks, Lada.
I updated the draft accordingly + reflected the interpretation shared by Jürgen.
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries-02.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries/
Htmlized:
Hi Lada,
Thank you for the comments.
Pleases see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Ladislav Lhotka
> Envoyé : vendredi 25 mars 2022 11:26
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ;
> netmod@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [netmod] TR: New Version Notification for draft-boucadair-
>
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Jürgen Schönwälder
> Envoyé : vendredi 25 mars 2022 09:01
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> Cc : Qin Wu ; netmod@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [netmod] TR: New Version Notification for draft-boucadair-
>
Hi Jürgen,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Jürgen Schönwälder
> Envoyé : vendredi 25 mars 2022 08:15
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> Cc : Qin Wu ; netmod@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [netmod] TR: New Version Notification for draft-boucadair-
>
Hi all,
FWIW, a new version that reflects the comments heard so far is available
online:
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries-01.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries/
Htmlized:
Re-,
Agree with Qin. This is one of the usual comments from yangdoctors.
The proposed clarification in draft-boucadair-netmod-iana-registries makes
explicit that, for IANA-maintained modules, designers should make a decision
based solely on their specific context.
Cheers,
Med
>
Hi Jürgen,
Thank you for the feedback.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Jürgen Schönwälder
> Envoyé : jeudi 24 mars 2022 11:27
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
> Cc : netmod@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [netmod] TR: New Version Notification for
Hi all,
We had in alto wg a discussion about consistent use of IANA-maintained modules.
This document provides some guidelines that I hope will ensure some consistency
about how we are interacting with IANA registries. The goal is avoid
transforming YANG modules (if not maintained by IANA) as
Re-,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : tom petch
> Envoyé : vendredi 15 octobre 2021 13:12
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; Rob Wilton
> (rwilton) ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-opsawg-vpn-com...@ietf.org
> Cc : netmod@ietf.org
>
Hi Rob, Tom, all,
The trees are different because we are not importing the acl module, but are
reusing "packet-fields" from RFC8519 to define the classification rules.
Please note that trees in vpn-common are printed with "--tree-print-groupings".
I suspected what happened for L3NM is that
Hi Carsten,
I confirm that what I meant is "bits per second" to align with rfc8299#6.12.1.
I'm actually for more explicit units similar to what we are using in another
active spec:
==
enum bit-ps {
value 2;
description
"Bits per Second (bit/s).";
}
Hi all,
I support.
Cheers,
Med
De : netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Kent Watsen
Envoyé : lundi 7 décembre 2020 23:33
À : netmod@ietf.org
Objet : [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06
This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
Hi Kent, all,
No, I'm not aware of any non-disclosed IPR that applies to this draft.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Kent Watsen [mailto:kent+i...@watsen.net]
> Envoyé : mardi 24 novembre 2020 00:02
> À : taoran (F) ; Qin Wu ;
> Benoit Claise ; Liang Geng|耿亮
> ;
Dear all,
This draft adds an extension to the interface module to identify the tunnel
type.
Comments are more than welcome.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : internet-dra...@ietf.org [mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org]
> Envoyé : vendredi 19 octobre 2018 14:41
> À : BOUCADAIR
46 matches
Mail list logo
