Hi John, all, If we want the fix to the appendix to be immediately visible to the readers (in the rendered version), wouldn’t be more appropriate to mark this erratum as “verified” rather than “held for doc update”?
Cheers, Med De : Andy Bierman <[email protected]> Envoyé : jeudi 31 mars 2022 19:11 À : John R. Levine <[email protected]> Cc : tom petch <[email protected]>; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[email protected]>; Kent Watsen <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Objet : Re: [netmod] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC8407 (6899) On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 9:56 AM John R. Levine <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > There are not thousands of RFCs that include a "Module Review Checklist" :-), > which is the purpose of this erratum. Thanks. > > <tp> > > I agree. There may be lots of RFC in error because RFC8407 gets it wrong but > if the update to the lots of RFC was wanted then it should have been > investigated last Autumn when the announcement of the change to the TLP was > made, an announcement that passed me by despite being on all the right > mailing lists. The fix to the TLP was my idea in the first place and it's not that big of a deal. If you follow the link and read that part of the TLP, the actual license has never changed. We just give it the correct name now. I agree the checklist in Appendix A should be updated. The corrected RFC (any RFC where Errata Exists) should be available online. Not erasing the published RFC, but with a link to rfcNNNN-current (where all accepted Errata is applied). Regards, John Levine, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly Andy _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
