Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

All, This last call is now closed. Since the comments were minor, this last call is considered successful. Authors, Please address any/all comments received during the LC. Once you've published the version that you believe addresses all comments/pending changes, I'll perform

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

> > > -邮件原件- > > > 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen > > > 发送时间: 2017年11月29日 3:29 > > > 收件人: netmod@ietf.org > > > 抄送: netmod-cha...@ietf.org > > > 主题: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

d] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod- rfc7223bis-00. Please recall that this update's intention is to modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA guidelines [1]. Reviewing the diff between the two dr

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

; Thanks, Eric > > -邮件原件- > > 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen > > 发送时间: 2017年11月29日 3:29 > > 收件人: netmod@ietf.org > > 抄送: netmod-cha...@ietf.org > > 主题: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 > > > > All,

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

t Watsen > 发送时间: 2017年11月29日 3:29 > 收件人: netmod@ietf.org > 抄送: netmod-cha...@ietf.org > 主题: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 > > All, > > This starts a two-week working group last call on > draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00. > > Pleas

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

_ > From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Kent Watsen > <kwat...@juniper.net> > Sent: Wednesday, 29 November 2017 8:29 a.m. > To: netmod@ietf.org > Cc: netmod-cha...@ietf.org > Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 > > Al

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen 发送时间: 2017年11月29日 3:29 收件人: netmod@ietf.org 抄送: netmod-cha...@ietf.org 主题: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00. Please recall

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

Balazs, the behaviour you assume is not defined in RFC 7950 and hence everything is marked explicitely as deprecated. We had a discussion on this, search the archives if you are interested. I personally see an advantage with explicit deprecation marks since if I look at an isolated definition of

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

Hello, container interfaces-state  is deprecated. I assume that if a container or list is deprecated, then all its contents are also deprecated.  Is there a need to mark all leafs deprecated too? regards Balazs On 2017-11-28 20:29, Kent Watsen wrote: All, This starts a two-week working

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

esday, 29 November 2017 8:29 a.m. To: netmod@ietf.org Cc: netmod-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00. Please recall that this update's intention is to modify the YANG mo

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

I have reviewed the draft and support publication. Thanks, Acee On 11/28/17, 2:29 PM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen" wrote: >All, > >This starts a two-week working group last call on >draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00. > >Please

[netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00

All, This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7223bis-00. Please recall that this update's intention is to modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA guidelines [1]. Reviewing the diff between the two drafts [2] should reveal just this. The working group