Juergen Schoenwaelder j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de writes:
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 02:50:04PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
If there is no ephemeral data, then config data is what counts. However, if
some config parameters may be overriden by ephemeral values, then a separate
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 03 Aug 2015, at 18:01, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 03 Aug 2015, at 16:41, Andy
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 06 Aug 2015, at 13:03, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:58 AM,
On 06 Aug 2015, at 17:31, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:50 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 06 Aug 2015, at 13:03, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
Andy
On 03 Aug 2015, at 16:41, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:06:41AM +0200, Jernej Tuljak wrote:
Juergen Schoenwaelder je 3.8.2015 ob 10:18 napisal:
Any
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:06:41AM +0200, Jernej Tuljak wrote:
Juergen Schoenwaelder je 3.8.2015 ob 10:18 napisal:
Any description statement in principle can do this. We trust that sane
data
Juergen Schoenwaelder je 3.8.2015 ob 11:25 napisal:
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 11:06:41AM +0200, Jernej Tuljak wrote:
Juergen Schoenwaelder je 3.8.2015 ob 10:18 napisal:
Any description statement in principle can do this. We trust that sane
data model writers won't do bad things. And if they do,
On 03 Aug 2015, at 18:01, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 03 Aug 2015, at 16:41, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 03 Aug 2015, at 18:01, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 03 Aug 2015, at 16:41, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On 30 Jul 2015, at 13:31, Jernej Tuljak jern...@mg-soft.si wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka je 30.7.2015 ob 11:30 napisal:
On 30 Jul 2015, at 01:12, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com
Ladislav Lhotka je 30.7.2015 ob 13:35 napisal:
On 30 Jul 2015, at 13:31, Jernej Tuljak jern...@mg-soft.si wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka je 30.7.2015 ob 11:30 napisal:
On 30 Jul 2015, at 01:12, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com
On 30 Jul 2015, at 13:41, Jernej Tuljak jern...@mg-soft.si wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka je 30.7.2015 ob 13:35 napisal:
On 30 Jul 2015, at 13:31, Jernej Tuljak jern...@mg-soft.si wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka je 30.7.2015 ob 11:30 napisal:
On 30 Jul 2015, at 01:12, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:31:01PM +0200, Jernej Tuljak wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka je 30.7.2015 ob 11:30 napisal:
On 30 Jul 2015, at 01:12, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On 30 Jul 2015, at 13:38, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:31:01PM +0200, Jernej Tuljak wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka je 30.7.2015 ob 11:30 napisal:
On 30 Jul 2015, at 01:12, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29,
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
Hi,
I understand the intent is that an implementation of NACM
has to understand these NACM extensions. I agree with Lada
that
On 30 Jul 2015, at 01:12, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
Hi,
I understand the intent is that an implementation of NACM
has to understand these NACM extensions.
Ladislav Lhotka je 30.7.2015 ob 11:30 napisal:
On 30 Jul 2015, at 01:12, Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
Hi,
I understand the intent is that an implementation of NACM
has
On 29 Jul 2015, at 17:02, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:55:03PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
On 29 Jul 2015, at 16:44, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 04:38:41PM
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
Hi,
I understand the intent is that an implementation of NACM
has to understand these NACM extensions. I agree with Lada
that the YANG text about MAY ignore extensions casts doubt whether
this sort of NACM rule is enforceable or specified correctly.
Hi,
I understand the intent is that an implementation of NACM
has to understand these NACM extensions. I agree with Lada
that the YANG text about MAY ignore extensions casts doubt whether
this sort of NACM rule is enforceable or specified correctly.
Andy
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 10:44 AM,
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com writes:
Hi,
I do not agree that ephemeral data should be outside the scope of the
standard.
I do not agree that YANG extensions should be used for IETF standards track
modules.
It was a mistake to define the get-filter hack in the first place.
IMO it is a
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:34:17AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
I do not agree that YANG extensions should be used for IETF standards track
modules.
I strongly disagree. This was one of the two original ideas behind
extension statements
On 29 Jul 2015, at 12:25, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:34:17AM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
I do not agree that YANG extensions should be used for IETF standards track
Hi,
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 05:17:11PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
Hi,
I would like to open another issue for YANG 1.1,
because I don't want
Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 28 Jul 2015, at 11:42, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Hi,
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Ladislav Lhotka lho...@nic.cz wrote:
On 28 Jul 2015, at 11:42, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Hi,
Andy Bierman a...@yumaworks.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 12:53:41PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
What might be a new task for YANG is to define general syntax for identifying
different trees and inter-tree references.
This is not the time to add new features to YANG 1.1.
/js
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 05:17:11PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
Hi,
I would like to open another issue for YANG 1.1,
because I don't want to have 1.1 and then 1.2 right away.
The NETMOD WG should evaluate the different ways to
support ephemeral state, based on Jeff's draft.
The NETMOD WG
Hi,
I agree it should be a WG (maybe IESG) decision whether YANG 1.1
should be published ASAP and a new version started right away to update it.
The RFC publication process is not that hard to solve. The tool and user
confusion caused by all these versions is another matter.
more inline...
Hi,
I would like to open another issue for YANG 1.1,
because I don't want to have 1.1 and then 1.2 right away.
The NETMOD WG should evaluate the different ways to
support ephemeral state, based on Jeff's draft.
Andy
___
netmod mailing list
30 matches
Mail list logo
