On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 05:17:11PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to open another issue for YANG 1.1, > because I don't want to have 1.1 and then 1.2 right away. > The NETMOD WG should evaluate the different ways to > support ephemeral state, based on Jeff's draft. >
The NETMOD WG did spent almost a full day face-to-face interim meeting time in September 2014 on this and now we have a requirements I-D plus a solution proposal that does not directly match what was discussed back then. It is my understanding that the solution discussed in September 2014 does not require changes to YANG 1.1. I2RS was aware of the YANG 1.1 timeline from the very beginning. YANG 1.1 is gating other specifications and I am not interested to hold everything off (including RESTCONF) because of I2RS. There are many other customers of YANG 1.1 beyond I2RS. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
