Re: [netmod] AD review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-07

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:19:33AM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: > module foomod { > > namespace"http://example.com/foomod;; > > prefix "foo"; > > container top { >leaf foo { > type uint8; >} > } >} > > Use "example-" in the module name, as

Re: [netmod] AD review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-07

Hi Benoit, thank you for the review, please see my responses inline. Benoit Claise writes: > Dear all, > > I understood from the chairs that draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json is now > ready and that the write-up will be completed end of this week. > In order to speed up the

Re: [netmod] AD review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-07

Hi Lada, Thanks for the quick reply. Hi Benoit, thank you for the review, please see my responses inline. Benoit Claise writes: Dear all, I understood from the chairs that draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json is now ready and that the write-up will be completed end of this week.

Re: [netmod] AD review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-07

Hi, I entered a new 6087bis issue: https://github.com/netmod-wg/rfc6087bis/issues/27 I agree the conventions need to be spelled out. IMO there are many problematic examples in 6020bis. The convention "..." is used and some newbie could think it was some valid YANG syntax. There are also example

Re: [netmod] AD review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-07

> On Feb 3, 2016, at 2:49 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:19:33AM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: > >> module foomod { >> >> namespace"http://example.com/foomod;; >> >> prefix "foo"; >> >> container top { >>

Re: [netmod] AD review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-07

> On 03 Feb 2016, at 15:35, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Benoit Claise wrote: >> Hi Lada, >> >> Thanks for the quick reply. >>> Hi Benoit, >>> >>> thank you for the review, please see my responses inline. >>> >>> Benoit Claise writes: >

Re: [netmod] AD review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-07

Benoit Claise wrote: > Hi Lada, > > Thanks for the quick reply. > > Hi Benoit, > > > > thank you for the review, please see my responses inline. > > > > Benoit Claise writes: [...] > >> o identity, > >> > >> There is no identity definition in the

Re: [netmod] AD review: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-07

Hi Lada, I agree with Juergen that 6087bis should distinguish between complete example modules and short module snippets that are used for explaining a certain YANG language or encoding issue. If you look at this particular example, then changing the JSON document on p. 6 to {