Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-07.txt

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Randy Presuhn wrote: > Hi - > > >From: Martin Bjorklund > >Sent: Sep 28, 2015 3:15 AM > >To: jern...@mg-soft.si > >Cc: netmod@ietf.org > >Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-07.txt > ...

Re: [netmod] opstate-reqs #6: clarify impact of synchronous vs asynchronous (esp. wrt intended and applied)

Hi Andy, On 24/09/2015 19:22, Andy Bierman wrote: Hi, I find this exercise to classify servers as synchronous or asynchronous mostly useless. We have both types of instrumentation in our server. They can be different on a per-node basis. They can both take a long time or both be instant,

Re: [netmod] opstate-reqs #6: clarify impact of synchronous vs asynchronous (esp. wrt intended and applied)

On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: > Hi Andy, > > > On 24/09/2015 19:22, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > I find this exercise to classify servers as synchronous or asynchronous > mostly useless. > We have both types of instrumentation in our server. They

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-07.txt

Hi - >From: Martin Bjorklund >Sent: Sep 28, 2015 3:15 AM >To: jern...@mg-soft.si >Cc: netmod@ietf.org >Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-07.txt ... >Ok; the intention was "replace if it exists, and create otherwise" >(i.e., "replace" as in NETCONF

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] restconf and namespaces and unique module names.

[Cross posting to netmod mailing list since this discussion affects YANG] > On Sep 22, 2015, at 12:03 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 05:25:04PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: >>> >>> RFC 6020: >>> >>> The names of all standard

Re: [netmod] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-05.txt

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 03:46:27PM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 23 Sep 2015, at 15:11, Juergen Schoenwaelder > > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:14:52AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > I must admit I am getting lost in

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-07.txt

Martin Bjorklund je 28.9.2015 ob 12:15 napisal: Jernej Tuljak wrote: Martin Bjorklund je 25.9.2015 ob 15:22 napisal: Jernej Tuljak wrote: Ladislav Lhotka je 25.9.2015 ob 13:44 napisal: Jernej Tuljak writes: Ladislav Lhotka je

[netmod] today's (2015-09-28) virtual interim on YANG 1.1 cancelled

Hi, after consulting with Martin Bjorklund, I decided to cancel today's YANG 1.1 virtual interim meeting. Martin has posted https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-07 and it seems discussions progress on the list at this point in time but if needed we will make use of the YANG

[netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-07 (until 2015-10-12)

This is a notice to start a NETMOD WG last call for the document "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language": https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-07 Please indicate your support by Monday October 12, 2015 at 13:00 CEST. We are not only interested in receiving defect reports, we

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-07.txt

Jernej Tuljak wrote: > Martin Bjorklund je 25.9.2015 ob 15:22 napisal: > > Jernej Tuljak wrote: > >> Ladislav Lhotka je 25.9.2015 ob 13:44 napisal: > >>> Jernej Tuljak writes: > >>> > Ladislav Lhotka je 25.9.2015 ob 9:58 napisal:

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-07.txt

Martin Bjorklund je 28.9.2015 ob 14:51 napisal: Jernej Tuljak wrote: Martin Bjorklund je 28.9.2015 ob 12:15 napisal: Jernej Tuljak wrote: Martin Bjorklund je 25.9.2015 ob 15:22 napisal: Jernej Tuljak wrote: Ladislav Lhotka je