On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:23:27AM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
> I don't see how YANG syntax defines this. If a module imports
> ietf-netconf-acm, it could be because
>
> - it just uses a typedef, such as "node-instance-identifier", and then
> ietf-netconf-acm needn't be implemented (but
Andy Bierman writes:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 6:08 AM Balázs Lengyel 40ericsson@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello Mahesh,
>>
>> I was asked by the group to include in each import statement whether the
>> imported module is needed as import-only or as implemented. IMHO
>> netmod/netconf
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 6:08 AM Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> Hello Mahesh,
>
> I was asked by the group to include in each import statement whether the
> imported module is needed as import-only or as implemented. IMHO
> netmod/netconf group should agree on some standard text for model designers
> to
Hello Mahesh,
I was asked by the group to include in each import statement whether the
imported module is needed as import-only or as implemented. IMHO netmod/netconf
group should agree on some standard text for model designers to use. Maybe the
text proposed below can be used everywhere. The
Maybe this approach can be for the algorithms in the "iana-*algs.yang" modules
defined in the crypto-types draft. The '*' expands to symmetric, asymmetric,
and hash. The problem is that I'm unsure if there is exists 1-1 registries.
But, to the extent there are registries, this approach
