Re: [netmod] Missing references

2018-02-09 Thread t.petch
Henrik, Benoit

My first e-mail was sloppily worded.  What I meant was RFC in the
Reference clause of a YANG module, since I think that those should be in
the Reference section as well.

I think that it should apply to the Description clause as well, but that
might be more debatable i.e. missing when it appears in Reference I
would see as an error, but missing when it appears in Description, um
perhaps a warning?

Tom Petch

- Original Message -
From: "Benoit Claise" 
To: "t.petch" ; "Henrik Levkowetz"
; "NETMOD Working Group" 
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 11:56 AM

> Hi Henrik,
>
> Could this check be added to idnits?
>
> Regards, Benoit
> > I just came across (yet) another example of a reference to an RFC in
a
> > description clause of a YANG module that appears nowhere else in the
> > I-D.
> >
> > This seems to be a systematic error that some YANG module authors
make;
> > can the tools be modified to pick it up?  The logic is simple
enough.
> >
> > The latest example is in draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-09 which fails to
> > reference RFC5952;  I think that the I-D is in the RFC Editor queue.
> >
> > Tom Petch
> >
> > .
> >
>

___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] Missing references

2018-02-08 Thread Benoit Claise

Hi Henrik,

It makes sense. Thanks.

Regards, B.

Hi Benoit,

On 2018-02-07 12:56, Benoit Claise wrote:

Hi Henrik,

Could this check be added to idnits?

Yes.  I thought I had something like this already, but it was specifically
to look out for mentions of RFC2119.

As you may know, I'm due to begin a complete rewrite of idnits, from the
current implementation (idnits started as a 10-line AWK program to check
draft line lengths, in 2000 or 2001) to Python, this March.  I'd like to
defer this till then; adding code to the now close to 4000 lines of mixed
AWK and bash isn't always straightforward.


Best regards,

Henrik


Regards, Benoit

I just came across (yet) another example of a reference to an RFC in a
description clause of a YANG module that appears nowhere else in the
I-D.

This seems to be a systematic error that some YANG module authors make;
can the tools be modified to pick it up?  The logic is simple enough.

The latest example is in draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-09 which fails to
reference RFC5952;  I think that the I-D is in the RFC Editor queue.

Tom Petch

.





___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] Missing references

2018-02-08 Thread Henrik Levkowetz
Hi Benoit,

On 2018-02-07 12:56, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
> 
> Could this check be added to idnits?

Yes.  I thought I had something like this already, but it was specifically
to look out for mentions of RFC2119.

As you may know, I'm due to begin a complete rewrite of idnits, from the
current implementation (idnits started as a 10-line AWK program to check
draft line lengths, in 2000 or 2001) to Python, this March.  I'd like to
defer this till then; adding code to the now close to 4000 lines of mixed
AWK and bash isn't always straightforward.


Best regards,

Henrik

> Regards, Benoit
>> I just came across (yet) another example of a reference to an RFC in a
>> description clause of a YANG module that appears nowhere else in the
>> I-D.
>>
>> This seems to be a systematic error that some YANG module authors make;
>> can the tools be modified to pick it up?  The logic is simple enough.
>>
>> The latest example is in draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-09 which fails to
>> reference RFC5952;  I think that the I-D is in the RFC Editor queue.
>>
>> Tom Petch
>>
>> .
>>
> 
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] Missing references

2018-02-07 Thread Benoit Claise

Hi Henrik,

Could this check be added to idnits?

Regards, Benoit

I just came across (yet) another example of a reference to an RFC in a
description clause of a YANG module that appears nowhere else in the
I-D.

This seems to be a systematic error that some YANG module authors make;
can the tools be modified to pick it up?  The logic is simple enough.

The latest example is in draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rip-09 which fails to
reference RFC5952;  I think that the I-D is in the RFC Editor queue.

Tom Petch

.



___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod