On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> On 2016-02-25 at 17:35:56 +0100, Vadim Kochan wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Daniel Borkmann
On 2016-02-25 at 17:35:56 +0100, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Daniel Borkmann
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Vadim,
> >>
> >> thanks for looking into this,
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hi Vadim,
>
> thanks for looking into this, appreciate it!
>
> On 02/20/2016 03:28 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I tried
Hi Vadim,
thanks for looking into this, appreciate it!
On 02/20/2016 03:28 PM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
Hi,
I tried to come up with visual separating of printed flows as currently
its not easy to identify separate flow
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Vadim Kochan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to come up with visual separating of printed flows as currently
> its not easy to identify separate flow entry, so I did some changes and
> I am not sure if it looks good so I atached the screenshot.
>
>