I'm having great difficulty getting map pages from streetmap.co.uk.
Many of the aquares don't appear, and if I refresh the page I just get
a different random selection of squares. It is very difficult to get
all nine squares of a small map at once, and virtually impossible to
get all 25
On 13 Jun 2013 Bernard Boase wrote:
Until recently Netsurf could render maps at streetmap.co.uk provided
one entered via their older interface at
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm from which exporting a
drawfile could be extremely useful.
But now even entering via this URL
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:58:17AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
On 13 Jun 2013 Bernard Boase wrote:
NetSurf 2.9 will render the maps; the latest dev versions won't.
I've complained to streetmap about the removal of the old interface.
In particualr it makes it harder to extract the map
In message 000e0c75.01cce5000...@smtp.freeola.net
Peter Slegg p.sl...@scubadivers.co.uk wrote:
It works if you enter a search location and then display the
static map.
I'm using v1257.
After locating a significant map, I just put this url address into my
hotlist and now run SM
On 14 Jun 2013 Rob Kendrick wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 09:58:17AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
On 13 Jun 2013 Bernard Boase wrote:
NetSurf 2.9 will render the maps; the latest dev versions won't.
I've complained to streetmap about the removal of the old interface.
In particualr it
Until recently Netsurf could render maps at streetmap.co.uk provided
one entered via their older interface at
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm from which exporting a
drawfile could be extremely useful.
But now even entering via this URL, the map display is only in the new
format
In article 026d155b53.bo...@boase.demon.co.uk,
Bernard Boase b.bo...@bcs.org wrote:
But now even entering via this URL, the map display is only in the new
format which Netsurf apparently cannot display. I am currently using
3.1 (Dec Cl #1252).
Seems to work OK with Dev CI #1257. Thanks
... via their older interface at
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm ... the map display is only
in the new format which Netsurf apparently cannot display.
It has changed, and it is annoying, but what I get with NS 3.00 (and
RO5.18) is better than that.
It all works normally as far
In article 026d155b53.bo...@boase.demon.co.uk,
Bernard Boase b.bo...@bcs.org wrote:
Until recently Netsurf could render maps at streetmap.co.uk provided
one entered via their older interface at
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm from which exporting a
drawfile could be extremely
In article 026d155b53.bo...@boase.demon.co.uk,
Bernard Boase b.bo...@bcs.org wrote:
Until recently Netsurf could render maps at streetmap.co.uk provided
one entered via their older interface at
http://www.streetmap.co.uk/newdefaulte2.htm from which exporting a
drawfile could be extremely
... Streetmap hasn't changed recently...
It has!
I use it regularly and the behaviour changed (as per my previous posting)
about a week ago.
Regards
--
John Harrison
Website http://jaharrison.me.uk
In article 535b3bc356j...@jaharrison.me.uk,
John Harrison j...@jaharrison.me.uk wrote:
... Streetmap hasn't changed recently...
It has!
I use it regularly and the behaviour changed (as per my previous posting)
about a week ago.
Alright - I should have been more spoecific. There has
But if javascript is on - then it does not work at all, doesn't display
the No javascript message and doesn't progress (no change there
either!)... Maybe this is your problem?
Hadn't explicitly thought about that, but I just (3.0) with JS enabled and
JS disabled. The behaviour seems to be
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:22:43 +0100
From: Bernard Boase b.bo...@bcs.org
Subject: streetmap.co.uk
To: netsurf-users@netsurf-browser.org
Message-ID: 026d155b53.bo...@boase.demon.co.uk
Until recently Netsurf could render maps at streetmap.co.uk provided
one entered via their older interface
On 13 Jun, Alan Calder alan_cal...@o2.co.uk wrote:
Is 3.1 a JS enabled version and is the presence of such ability at the
root of the problem?
You're right. If I disable Javascript (in Choices-Content) I do get
visible maps, now in the new theme and after a brief message advising
that
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6 Dec 2008 Rob Kendrick wrote:
A browser that cannot render broken HTML is not a useful thing, given
the vast majority of sites are broken. Thus, knowing that sites are
broken is not useful.
But knowing how they
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob
Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be all for people never mentioning validators here ever again.
They serve no useful purpose for the development of web browsers.
Are they useful for anything? Have I been wasting my time making sure
that all my web pages
On 6 Dec 2008 Rob Kendrick wrote:
I'd be all for people never mentioning validators here ever again.
They serve no useful purpose for the development of web browsers.
But they do provide a useful purpose for the development of web sites,
unless of course you'd prefer to have no standards at
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob
Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Snip]
I'd be all for people never mentioning validators here ever again. They
serve no useful purpose for the development of web browsers.
That's such a bizarre statement I would frame it but for the fact this
isn't paper.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Kendrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Snip missed irony]
The end.
Let's hope so.
--
Tim Hill,
www.timil.com
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tim Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rob Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:03:29 + (GMT) Tim Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tim Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cc. of email to street map:
[snip]
I didn't really understand this. Anyway, there is at least one NetSurf bug
that we know to be causing bad layout on the new streetmap.co.uk site.
You may want to run a few of your pages
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Validation results aren't a guarantee of anything.
It's a start.
The chances are that if they can't get that bit right...
--
Tim Hill,
www.timil.com
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:03:29 + (GMT)
Tim Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Validation results aren't a guarantee of anything.
It's a start.
The chances are that if they can't get that bit right...
Not really. The
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob
Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:03:29 + (GMT) Tim Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Validation results aren't a guarantee of anything.
It's a start.
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:39:05 + (GMT)
Tim Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Rob Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:03:29 + (GMT) Tim Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Drake
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh dear. That s useful site http://www.streetmap.co.uk has now
been redesigned. You can for the time being click through to the
original version, but with the new one you enter names, postcodes etc.
a bit displaced below the proffered input box, and it still works.
But on choosing the new
On 4 Dec 2008 Bernard Boase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh dear. That s useful site http://www.streetmap.co.uk has now
been redesigned. You can for the time being click through to the
original version, but with the new one you enter names, postcodes etc.
a bit displaced below the proffered
28 matches
Mail list logo
