Re: nettime Digital Humanities Manifesto

2009-02-22 Thread Florian Cramer

On Friday, February 20 2009, 15:55 (-0500), Michael Wojcik wrote:
 Flick Harrison wrote:
 
  I can understand the temptation to reduce digital to numbers.
 
 There may be such a temptation, but at the end of the day, digital
 and certain fields of numbers (namely discrete ones), as technical
 terms, are isomorphic. There's no reduction going on.

It should be added that other languages have only one word for both. 
The French word for digital is numérique. It has the same broad
semantics as digital in English (including the notion of a culture
numérique).

Florian

-- 
blog: http://en.pleintekst.nl
homepage: http://cramer.pleintekst.nl:70
  gopher://cramer.pleintekst.nl


#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org


Re: nettime Exiled in NYU -- and now.. HELSINKI UNIVERSITY

2009-02-22 Thread Joe Lockard
All EU universities charge fees to non-EU students, as far as I know. I
have always had to pay fees as a non-EU student.  There were certain
exceptions for economically disadvantaged, but everyone else paid.  Keep
in mind, most students outside North America are paid for by their home
governments.  The same is true in North America, except that here
EVERYONE pays.

If Finland is not charging non-EU, then that is the best deal on Earth.
I wish I had known. 

On the plus side, the Congress just appropriated the most money for
higher education ever, increased student subsidies, grants and loans,
reduced the criteria for obtaining financial assistance, increased the
ability of working people to deduct the cost of higher
education/training from their tax bills, and tens of billions for basic
research.  Its not the whole kaboodle, but its a start.

Of course, if you get all your news on IRC, you might have missed this.

Mike W

---

There is vastly more on the negative side.  The stimulus package
increases affordability to a limited degree, but why should access to a
human right be determined by affordability as measured by individual
means?  Accessibility to public higher education in the United States is
declining and appears set to continue declining for the near-term
future.  

Mike W may live in an alternate universe.  At my university, about the
largest in the United States, the economic crisis and state budget cuts
are not just a nightmare, it's an extinction event.  The university's
historic old campus will survive, although its buildings may be a lot
emptier.  A new downtown campus, with 7500 students and the smallest,
will survive.  Two other campuses, representing nearly 17,500 students,
are at risk. Despite the stimulus package, probably another $152 million
will be cut from the state contribution to the university budget for the
upcoming fiscal year, meaning that at least one campus will be shut
down.  Entire faculties have disappeared and more are slated to go.
About 48 degree programs have been terminated. Over 1,000 of our faculty
and staff have been laid off; as many or more will disappear in coming
budget cuts.  Everyone is on rotating furlough days, with a resulting
10-15 percent pay cut.  

Fall admissions are being ended in one week, or five months early, which
will mean 3-5,000 fewer entering students.  Those who do enter will face
much higher tuition, possibly as much as double.  This may not help the
university, though, because the state is now sweeping positive-balance
accounts into general funds. The stimulus package's Pell grants
increases will not meet the probable tuition hikes. 

Several structural changes are occurring in Arizona higher education,
changes that appear in more extreme form here due to the local political
climate created by right-to-far-right domination of the state
legislature.  One is a massive new limitation on the goal of expanded
public access to higher education.  Opponents of expanded higher
education have never been lacking in this state.  They believe that
education is a commodity to be purchased, not a public service or human
right.  Public financial support for higher education -- or any other
level of education -- contradicts a philosophical predisposition against
taxes.  

The growth of the campuses slated for potential closure has been driven
by first-generation college students from the Hispanic, Native American
and other minority communities.  When programs are cut or closed, their
opportunities disappear.  For example, admissions to the RN degree
program have been halved because it is a very expensive program that
needs substantial public subsidy.  The public university tuition is
$5700 annually; a private commercial school charges over $40K annual
tuition for its RN degree program (also 80-90 percent of private college
students fail the licensing exam, whereas a similar percentage of public
university students pass).  Educational access is simply disappearing,
with minorities especially hard hit.  

Another structural change within the institution is the conversion of
already-contingent teaching labor into even-more contingent labor.
Three-year rolling contract lecturers are being converted into one-year
fixed-term lecturers.  Instructors with benefits and one-year contracts
are being offered faculty associate positions without benefits and on
semester-by-semester contracts.  Across the university, the proportion
of untenured faculty to tenure-track faculty continues to rise.  The
administration is using the budget crisis to implement its long-desired
goal of lower-cost and more flexible labor.   

There are massive changes in internal administrative structure towards
consolidation and cost-cutting.  The basic scheme is to take three or
four departments, each with their own chair and staff, and re-organize
them into schools with one director and a consolidated reduced staff.
One result will be reduction in the role of faculty governance, 

Re: nettime Exiled in NYU -- and now.. HELSINKI UNIVERSITY

2009-02-22 Thread juha huuskonen
Michael Weisman wrote:

 If Finland is not charging non-EU, then that is the best deal on  Earth. I
 wish I had known.

Yes, Finland does currently offer free education for non-EU students.  
The bizarre thing is that after getting this free education, you have  
only 6 months time to find a job, otherwise you have to leave the  
country.

The free education for non-EU students is very likely to disappear if  
the new law is passed.

Some more comments about the Finnish situation -

There were simultaneous demonstrations in several cities this week,  
the biggest one was in Helsinki with approx 1500 participants. This  
amount does not sound like much, but Finland is a small country and  
demonstrations are quite rare here. A new petition against the new law  
is now online, there are right now 3842 names there including 83  
professors from different universities, I guess several thousand names  
will appear within the next days.

It's surprising that these demonstrations are happening so late. In  
2005 a law was passed that caused big changes in the way universities  
are managed, basically modifying the Finnish system to fit the Bologna  
agreement. The new law introduced more careful monitoring of  
productivity of universities: a lot of new forms to be filled, more  
numeric goals to reach (funding based on how many papers are produced,  
how many people graduate every year, etc) and salaries based on the  
productivity. Some people protested - professor Heikki Patom?ki from  
Helsinki University has been (and still is) the most visible opponent  
of this development.

I personally studied under the 'old system', where students were given  
a lot of freedom and responsibility, which meant that instead of rushing
through the educational system as efficiently as possible, many of us  
started part-time work during study time, or did minor subject studies  
in other schools. In the current system students have much more  
pressure to get their masters degree in planned approx 4 years. It's  
maybe needless to say that in my opinion the old system produced  
better results.

The new law that is about to be passed brings many changes to the  
educational system. The most controversial are currently the changes  
in high level decision making. Students, researchers, professors and  
everyone involved in the academic activity might in some cases have no  
voice in the University board. The board would consist of people  
decided by the Ministry of Education and funders (=companies). Even  
the rector of Helsinki School of Economics has objected to this new  
arrangement.

It is very interesting to see how things develop... And how much the  
laws can actually change what individual people and departments do.  
There is right now an interesting discussion going on on the iDC list  
about education, and I thought this comment by Davin Heckman was great:

//

I mean, there are two distinct things that I do:  One is a form of  
labor: showing up, taking attendance, assigning crap, grading it, and  
then following some ridiculous grading rubric that assigns a point  
value to some mundane task that the student is forced to carry out.   
In exchange, they get a grade and I get money.  In my opinion, this is  
all just a cover for what professors, students, and universities  
really do.

The other thing, and this is what I really do in class, beneath this  
bizarre theatrical labor, is share thought processes.  I mean, I spend  
so much of my time writing things and sharing them with students, that  
I have a hard time imagining that anyone could adequately compensate  
me for it.  So much of my writing is done with my heart and mind on my  
own three children, that I cannot really imagine someone really paying  
me an appropriate amount of money for it.  But I share it with my  
students because I like them.  And the students who really want to  
explore these ideas, well, they get invited to dinner at my house to  
talk further about these things.  Or we go out to coffee and read  
extra books together.  I really don't imagine that anyone is paying  
for this or that I am getting money for it.

//

What Davin is writing about is something that I can experience within  
the Finnish universities that are about to go through the new changes  
in structure. There is a lot of uncertainty in the air about the new  
administrative structure but the people involved in actual teaching  
know what their basic task is and why they've chosen their profession.

This spring I'm working as the curator for the spring show of Helsinki  
University of Art and Design. This university will be combined with  
the Helsinki University of Technology and Helsinki School of Economics  
to form one big 'Innovation University' (this was the official working  
title) that will be called 'Aalto University'. This initiative is at  
the heart of the current controversy - the new law was drafted mostly  
to make this new Aalto University 

nettime post for the list serv - Economic Transmissions - How is the current economic crisis affecting you?

2009-02-22 Thread katherine bennett
I wanted to mention a new project I'm working on, and to invite you,
and others you know to take part.  Please feel free to spread the
word, re-post, etc

Economic Transmissions needs your help!  We want to know how the
current economic situation has been affecting you.  What changes are
being made in your life and how does this impact you on a daily
basis?  Are you giving something up, doing less of something or more
of something?

We need your messages, your sounds, your audio clips, your voices that
tell us about how this affects you.  These audio messages will be used
in the sound and light installation - Economic Transmissions - and
will debut at the Synthetic Zero Exhibition Event March 4 and 7, in
the Bronx, NY.

Please call 212.660.0161, extension 2100 to leave your messages and
audio clips that describe how this crisis affects you.

If the mailbox is full, please try again the following day. We look
forward to hearing your responses.

Thanks for your time!
ps. --  call 212.660.0161, extension 2100


#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime  is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org