oh thanks for the information(s)
i felt like we were doing it in the list 'right here & now' (the design,
and fractured cultural specific situation methodologies)
that might be 'aesthetic experience' lapses, which prooves yur right, & we
've passed beyond the perimeters,
left infinite speed.
i don'
Hello Johnatan,
Maybe I should not have included that phrase on the infinity of art /
techno-science / advanced capitalism, as it distracts from the main point about
the necessity of a deep engagement in deliberate acts of political design, and
a shift from ‘revolutionary’ tactics to methodolo
On 10/14/2017 03:01 AM, Keith Hart wrote:
The shift to deconstruction and construction presumes, to my mind, that
the question of homo duplex has been resolved and I don't think it has.
This confusion allows individuals to propose their own judgments as
social solutions without examining how th
hello Eric.
why not to call 'design' subversive input and outright denying of anything,
or rather B.Latour would say, 'visualize' them. by design or by
art-techno-science and advanced capitalism? i ask because these last three
categories
do not make sense, they are not detailed to a symbolic meanin
Dear felix, Brian, Keith,
Just a few notes here as comments on this discussion and the question of how to
translate into "a political, social and cultural practice” that felix raised.
Though I have critiqued Latour’s Thing politics in the “reDesigning Affect
Space” essay also posted here a week
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Felix Stalder wrote:
>
> I think Latour's answer (and I would largely agree with him) is that
> it's precisely the individual-society divide that its problematic,
> first, because neither can exists without the other and, second, because
> it implies that these t
On 2017-10-14 12:01, Keith Hart wrote:
> Are we sure that privileging the social has served or will serve
> humanity well? The shift to deconstruction and construction presumes, to
> my mind, that the question of homo duplex has been resolved and I don't
> think it has.
I think Latour's answer (
On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Felix Stalder wrote:
>
> >>On 2017-10-14 03:30, Brian Holmes wrote:
>
> > "Has critique run out of steam?" asked Bruno Latour around ten years
> > ago. It was a significant question.
>
> I think there are two ways to address this question.
>
> One relates more
On 2017-10-14 03:30, Brian Holmes wrote:
> "Has critique run out of steam?" asked Bruno Latour around ten years
> ago. It was a significant question.
I think there are two way to address this question.
One relates more to culture and as to do with the information overload
online and is best summ
On 10/13/2017 10:14 AM, mp wrote:
Does anyone remember the days before "climate change" was "armed with
peer-reviewed science" when reason, logic and empirical science was
under severe scrutiny as myths and illusions associated with
colonialism, racism and destruction of the human habitat?
Yea
Dear Patrick, Brian,
I read your post this am, Patrick, and was comforted amidst numerous recent
events to find a conscious intellect! No freak. And, of course, I have some
responses...for you and with Brian's comments! See inserted below.
On 10/13/2017 05:09 AM, Patrick Lichty wrote:
> > Has the
On 13/10/17 17:59, Brian Holmes wrote:
> On 10/13/2017 05:09 AM, Patrick Lichty wrote:
>> Has the United states, and a large part of Western thought become so
>> warped by populism and anti intellectualism (which is a complex and
>> stack in itself) that individuals seeking a humane, objective so
On 10/13/2017 05:09 AM, Patrick Lichty wrote:
Has the United states, and a large part of Western thought become so warped by
populism and anti intellectualism (which is a complex and stack in itself) that
individuals seeking a humane, objective society driven by reason, logic and
empirical sci
This might seem a bit dated but perhaps not.
In response to Brian Holmes' notion that the moderates are now the new
radicals, I was reflecting on the July 4th 2017 tweeting of the Declaration of
Independence by US National Public Radio. The Trump-base replies of putting
radical and subversive c
14 matches
Mail list logo
