021 à 08:37, patrice riemens a écrit :
> Aloha,
>
> (original to:
>
> https://librarianshipwreck.wordpress.com/2021/10/07/imagine-the-end-of-facebook/)
>
>
> The Wired article that triggered me into looking for, and now 'filtering'
> this one is here:
>
> https://w
Aloha,
(original to:
https://librarianshipwreck.wordpress.com/2021/10/07/imagine-the-end-of-facebook/)
The Wired article that triggered me into looking for, and now 'filtering' this
one is here:
https://www.wired.com/story/facebook-whistleblower-wont-change-anything/
Imagine the End
policies are
bad (of
course they are) or whether facebook is part of our social
infrastructure
(of course it is), but, rather, what capacity users have to undermine
facebook's more predatory policies and evade its data collection
regimes and
biased recommendation algorithms. given that
Dear nettimers,
the Facebook Question is a timely and necessary debate. It turns out that we’re
trapped. It is neither politically correct to leave, nor is it to stay. This is
the perfect example of the current stagnation (also known as The Great
Regression).
This topic was already discussed
.
I'd be curious about the server farms YouTube must use; they seem
unimaginable to me.
Best, Alan
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Craig Fahner wrote:
maybe it's not so much a question of whether facebook's policies are bad (of
course they are) or whether facebook is part of our social infrastructure
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Craig Fahner wrote:
>
> maybe it's not so much a question of whether facebook's policies are bad
> (of
> course they are) or whether facebook is part of our social infrastructure
> (of course it is), but, rather, what capacity users have to undermine
> facebook's
wrote:
maybe it's not so much a question of whether facebook's policies are
bad (of
course they are) or whether facebook is part of our social
infrastructure
(of course it is), but, rather, what capacity users have to undermine
facebook's more predatory policies and evade its data collection
they are) or whether facebook is part of our social infrastructure
(of course it is), but, rather, what capacity users have to undermine
facebook's more predatory policies and evade its data collection regimes
and
biased recommendation algorithms. given that a lot of people use facebook
Tube must use; they seem
> unimaginable to me.
>
> Best, Alan
>
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Craig Fahner wrote:
>
>> maybe it's not so much a question of whether facebook's policies are bad (of
>> course they are) or whether facebook is part of our social infrastructure
policies are bad (of
course they are) or whether facebook is part of our social infrastructure
(of course it is), but, rather, what capacity users have to undermine
facebook's more predatory policies and evade its data collection regimes and
biased recommendation algorithms. given that a lot of people
maybe it's not so much a question of whether facebook's policies are bad
(of course they are) or whether facebook is part of our social
infrastructure (of course it is), but, rather, what capacity users have to
undermine facebook's more predatory policies and evade its data collection
regimes
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, mp wrote:
On 03/11/2019 20:36, Alan Sondheim wrote:
The loss is more important to me
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019, Frederic Neyrat wrote:
1/ FB enables to create a "community," that's good for sure;?
2/ but in the same time, it destroys?the condition of the possibility of
Similar example.
I never had a Facebook account, either personal or with my projects in the
fields of media and participative urbanism, but often had to lurk through my
collaborators or intern in order to get to circles I wanted to access.
Now I am starting a new project curating
in August
concerning the Financial Action Task Force (FATF):
"Government does not create innovative solutions. In a capitalist system, we
rely upon the private sector for that."
So does this mean that we will allow Facebook and Google to continue to operate
so long as they make sure that our
On 03/11/2019 20:36, Alan Sondheim wrote:
>
> The loss is more important to me
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2019, Frederic Neyrat wrote:
>> 1/ FB enables to create a "community," that's good for sure;?
>> 2/ but in the same time, it destroys?the condition of the possibility of
>>
On 11/3/19 5:28 PM, Frederic Neyrat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know if some people on this list - be they activists,
> environmentalists, artists, thinkers, contributors - are (still) on
> Facebook and if yes, why, being given the extreme noxiousness of this
> &q
ur cognitive asymmetries, and the
different types of anoptical perspectives of networks and their conditions
of legitimacy, Facebook could be overcome the day when these points would
become evident to a large part of the population. It will one day, but when?
Anoptikon, preface of Philippe Quéau:
About eight and a half months ago I quit Facebook and all social media. My
reasons are given here:
https://medium.com/@premckar/a-farewell-to-social-media-33db26074498
<https://medium.com/@premckar/a-farewell-to-social-media-33db26074498>
Having said that, I echo the sentiments exp
-20180129.pdf
This looks like the "Internet money" that was central to a South Park
episode: https://southpark.cc.com/clips/165195/meet-the-internet-stars
I think we have more than enough awareness. We can't have more
awareness. Everybody knows what's Facebook, its limitations and
useful and it gives more scope to
> > textual
> > work than Instagram.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > On Sun, 3 Nov 2019, Frederic Neyrat wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to know if so
ection of these "mythic forces" (or whatever we call
them), MZ will be powerful *ad vitam aeternam*.
My best,
FN
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 2:17 PM Geoffrey Goodell wrote:
> P.S. I should have included a link to an article I co-authored about
> Facebook
> Libra:
&
work than Instagram.
Alan
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019, Frederic Neyrat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know if some people on this list - be they
activists,
> environmentalists, artists, thinkers, contributors - are
(still) on Facebook
> and
I'm on facebook because I have to manage social media for my employer.
Truly the only reason I'm on there!
Renée Reizman
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 11:53 AM wrote:
> Send nettime-l mailing list submissions to
> nettime-l@mail.kein.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the Wo
P.S. I should have included a link to an article I co-authored about Facebook
Libra:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3441707
Abstract:
The announcement by Facebook that Libra will "deliver on the promise of 'the
internet of money'" has drawn the attention of the financial world.
that there are some people who stand to benefit from this
dystopia we are building, or others who think that they stand to benefit
because they have not considered the implications of this new emerging morality
in which common people are transparent but powerful interests have many faces,
then w
ay social media is too vast to accurately
> assess.
>
> /:b
>
>
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2019, Frederic Neyrat wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to know if some people on this list - be they activists,
> > environmentalists, artists, thinkers, contributor
> >
> > I'd like to know if some people on this list - be they activists,
> > environmentalists, artists, thinkers, contributors - are (still) on
> Facebook
> > and if yes, why, being given the extreme noxiousness of this "social" (?)
> > netwo
Instagram.
Alan
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019, Frederic Neyrat wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know if some people on this list - be they activists,
environmentalists, artists, thinkers, contributors - are (still) on Facebook
and if yes, why, being given the extreme noxiousness of this "social" (
sts, thinkers, contributors - are (still) on
> >Facebook and if yes, why, being given the extreme noxiousness of this
> >"social" (?) network.
>
> I've been off Facebook (see caveats below), but the reasons people
> typically have to stay there are essentially th
On Sun, Nov 03, 2019 at 10:28:01AM -0600, Frederic Neyrat wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to know if some people on this list - be they activists,
environmentalists, artists, thinkers, contributors - are (still) on
Facebook and if yes, why, being given the extreme noxiousness of this
"social" (
Hi,
I'd like to know if some people on this list - be they activists,
environmentalists, artists, thinkers, contributors - are (still) on
Facebook and if yes, why, being given the extreme noxiousness of this
"social" (?) network.
This article
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2
t's a completely different logic than LIBRA that you have to buy
in dollars from Facebook before you start trading
Of course, Duniter is free and can be forked to create other monetary
communities Ğ2, Ğ3, Ğn or something else.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:29 AM Rachel O' Dwyer
wrote:
> Belo
Below is a response to Facebook's announcement that it's releasing a
digital currency and wallet.
Rachel
*The Bank of Facebook*
Marshall McLuhan argued that money is communication. This rings
particularly true at a time when so many platforms are entering the
payments space. The US payments
And then, as usual, First Dog on the Moon outclasses all text only
comments
"If Facebook’s algorithms are clever enough to send you ads for things
you’ve talked about, they are clever enough to get rid of Nazis"
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/mar/20/faceb
, 09:57, Allan Siegel wrote:
Hello,
All roads lead to Rome, or the the CIA, NSA, MI6, etc. etc. What happens
when you try to follow the money and reach a seemingly dead end?
"Obscure no-deal Brexit group is UK's biggest political spender on
Facebook / Britain’s Future has spent £340,000 prom
Hello,
All roads lead to Rome, or the the CIA, NSA, MI6, etc. etc. What happens when
you try to follow the money and reach a seemingly dead end? "Obscure no-deal
Brexit group is UK's biggest political spender on Facebook / Britain’s Future
has spent £340,000 promoting hard exit – but n
From our "we always thought it, but now we know" Dept. ...
Original to:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/feb/18/a-digital-gangster-destroying-democracy-the-damning-verdict-on-facebook
A digital gangster destroying democracy: the damning verdict on Facebook
Parliamen
Dear nettimers, a. you have all left Facebook by now (or ages ago), b. you are
still on it, c. could not be bothered, d. are busy with more relevant topics.
Here is some material in case you want to be uptodate about the social media
question. We’re now ten months into the Cambridge Analytica
what the party itself was doing. The whole story is below, and most
> likely not satire. Felix]
>
>
> Facebook ad micro-targeting can manipulate individual politicians
> Anonymous Labour Party official to Tom Baldwin
>
>
> https://theoutline.com/post/5411/facebook-ad-micro-tar
y
campaign also ran a campaign targeting an individual, the party leader
Jeremy Corbin (and his closest associates) trying to warp his perception
of what the party itself was doing. The whole story is below, and most
likely not satire. Felix]
Facebook ad micro-targeting can manipulate individual po
Thanks happy to join Pit’s initiative
> Lets call it #non-facebook.
> https://www.facebook.com/groups/217513475509054/
I am interpreting Pit's challenge to the tactics of anti-Facebook
movement as being based on a recognition that
we live in a world where the digital and the social
Kristoffer Gansing wrote:
As someone who
> never joined facebook in the first place, I can’t help wondering what
> then to do. Is a facebook user strike strictly for users, since we have
> frequently been told you cannot really be outside facebook whether you
> are i
Pit wrote:
> Towards a Non-facebook
> a pretext
>
>
> The current facebook debate is a chance to get your act together and
> get organized - just a little.
Thanks for this call to action Pit, much needed in these times of
inflated and often misinformed social media critiq
Towards a Non-facebook
a pretext
The current facebook debate is a chance to get your act together and
get organized - just a little.
What does it mean to get dis-, re- or co-organized? To the worse, or
to the better? A further 'balkanisation', a migration to the
cryptoanarchist waste
dear Anni,
On Sat, 05 May 2018, Anni Roolf wrote:
>Thank you for the pros and cons. Did you guys also read the
>medium article? [1]bit.ly/facebreak2018 In my experience it’s
>hard to consider such a campaign in advance. To join it can only
>be a piece of the puzzle, is an
Well, I quit Facebook on Quit Facebook Day back in May 2010 already, and
such activism today seems like going on a diet without much changing
your eating behaviour in the long run.
https://schneeschmelze.wordpress.com/2010/05/29/facebook-is-a-closed-shop-xvi-schlus/
I don't have any more social
Well, I quit Facebook on Quit Facebook Day back in May 2010 already, and
such activism today seems like going on a diet without much changing
your eating behaviour in the long run.
https://schneeschmelze.wordpress.com/2010/05/29/facebook-is-a-closed-shop-xvi-schlus/
I don't have any more social
Well, I quit Facebook on Quit Facebook Day back in May 2010 already, and
such activism today seems like going on a diet without much changing
your eating behaviour in the long run.
https://schneeschmelze.wordpress.com/2010/05/29/facebook-is-a-closed-shop-xvi-schlus/
I don't have any more social
<olivieraub...@gmail.com>:
> A good day to make your bill to Facebook?
> Why? Because Facebook stole your digital labor.
> The proof is that when you want to leave Facebook, the platform offers to
> bring with you a summary archive. But this archive is empty!
>
> It doe
A good day to make your bill to Facebook?
Why? Because Facebook stole your digital labor.
The proof is that when you want to leave Facebook, the platform offers to
bring with you a summary archive. But this archive is empty!
It does not contain:
- Links included in your personal posts (just
A good day to make your bill to Facebook?
Why? Because Facebook stole your digital labor.
The proof is that when you want to leave Facebook, the platform offers to
bring with you a summary archive. But this archive is empty!
It does not contain:
- Links included in your personal posts (just
On 2018-05-05 11:20, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
> I agree if the goal is to learn about facebook's reaction. But you are
> not addressing the root of the problem ie, the whole business model of
> facebook depends on collecting and monetizing the user data. What
> change/response ar
> On May 5, 2018, at 8:55 AM, Anni Roolf <anni.ro...@dezentrale.eu> wrote:
>
> Here's the call:
> Facebook has disrespected our personal data and disregarded the spirit of our
> user agreements. To demonstrate our collective power as users, log out of
> Facebook and I
On ശ, മേയ് 5, 2018 at 2:40 വൈകു, Anni Roolf
<anni.ro...@dezentrale.eu> wrote:
Why it makes sense for me to support the strike as a still facebook
user?
Raising awareness within the system, giving a hopefully powerful sign
that there's a big mistrust of the users, observing how the
Why it makes sense for me to support the strike as a still facebook user?
Raising awareness within the system, giving a hopefully powerful sign
that there's a big mistrust of the users, observing how the system
reacts (especially if the strike is powerful), letting fb users who
For those looking for an alternative to FB, try WeMe,com. No ad, no trackers,
no bullshit.
> On 5 May 2018, at 10:01, Patrice Riemens wrote:
>
> I thought we'd be going out of FB altogether.
- K -
--
Cats know how to obtain food without labour, shelter without
On ശ, മേയ് 5, 2018 at 1:25 വൈകു, Anni Roolf
<anni.ro...@dezentrale.eu> wrote:
Here's the call:
Facebook has disrespected our personal data and disregarded the
spirit of our user agreements. To demonstrate our collective power as
users, log out of Facebook and Instagram May 25 –
-05-05 09:55, Anni Roolf wrote:
Here's the call:
Facebook has disrespected our personal data and disregarded the spirit
of our user agreements. To demonstrate our collective power as users,
log out of Facebook and Instagram May 25 – June 1. #facebreak2018
[1] #newpower [2] bit.ly/facebreak2018 [3]
L
Here's the call:
Facebook has disrespected our personal data and disregarded the spirit
of our user agreements. To demonstrate our collective power as users,
log out of Facebook and Instagram May 25 – June 1. #facebreak2018
<https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/facebreak2018?source=feed_t
Un-friend my Heart - Revisiting Ilana Gershin on Facebook
Despite being nearly a decade old its a good time to take another look at
the work of anthropologist Ilana Gershin’s work The Ethics of Disconection in
Neo-liberal Age on Fb pioneering role of schooling a generation in
becoming
quot;
>
>
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_portability
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018, 18:50 olivier auber <olivieraub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Open letter to Yann LeCun, former Professor at College de France, Head of
>> Research in Artificial Intelligence a
ortability
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018, 18:50 olivier auber <olivieraub...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Open letter to Yann LeCun, former Professor at College de France, Head of
> Research in Artificial Intelligence at Facebook.
>
> From Olivier Auber, researcher, Free University of
Dear Olivier,
Really, people don't know what Facebook is? Holy cow!
Happy new year out of FB! :)
Frederic Neyrat
2018-01-10 11:49 GMT-06:00 olivier auber <olivieraub...@gmail.com>:
> Open letter to Yann LeCun, former Professor at College de France, Head of
> Research i
Open letter to Yann LeCun, former Professor at College de France, Head of
Research in Artificial Intelligence at Facebook.
>From Olivier Auber, researcher, Free University of Brussels (VUB)
Dear Yann
as a researcher as you are too, but in another area, that is Natural
Intelligence (NI), I wo
https://medium.com/initialized-capital/fascism-and-the-historical-irony-of-facebooks-fake-news-problem-d744b05045fd#.pcxf34w0r
Kim-Mai Cutler, 24.11.2016
<...>
I wanted to catch up and get his [Fred Turner's] reflections on the
election and Facebook and Twitter’s impact on American po
Another story about Facebook's increasing power to affect the vote. Two
years, Jonathan Zitrain showed how FB was able to increase voter turnout
by sending out reminders during the mid-term elections [1].
[1]
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117878/information-fiduciary-solution-facebook
<
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/19/opinion/the-real-bias-built-in-at-facebook.html
>
The Real Bias Built In at Facebook
by Zeynep Tufekci
NYT, MAY 19, 2016
FACEBOOK is biased. That's true. But not in the way conservative critics
say it is.
The social network's powerful ne
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:51 AM, carlo von lynX
<l...@time.to.get.psyced.org> wrote:
I think we need distributed social networking, with nodes that act
like a Facebook on your own device but only interact through a network
of agnostic relays, Tor style, with zero ex
server-assisted app to fuck off. The real solution, as usual, is
ideological, and the technology will follow.
This is a huge amount of work, uphill and against the wind, and there is
no way around it.
I think we need distributed social networking, with nodes that act
like a Facebook on your own
at can
corrupt our basic freedoms that may even not be important to us
as individuals but spell an end to democracy by dilution of its
constitution. See also the power of Google and Facebook to influence
the vote of 20-40% of the population in most countries and the
conclusions Assange describes in rec
Den 20-03-2016 kl. 11:43 skrev Patrice Riemens:
original to:
http://sivertimes.com/richard-stallman-wants-to-destroy-facebook-to-protect-privacy/17274
original interview in Le Devoir (Montreal) (in French):
http://www.ledevoir.com/societe/actualites-en-societe/465389/eradiquer-facebook-pour
t is another. It's conceivable, just slightly, that
Facebook could open-source all their software and not change their
behavior a bit. If someone really wants to smother you, they can
probably smother you with
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated
:
it is interesting to note that Facebook is one of the companies that
have publicly supported Apple in the case against the FBI seeking
access to encrypted data of iPhone. Facebook has also signed a motion
in court.
Best,
Michael via iPhone, so please ecuse misteaks.
> On Mar 20, 2016, at 3:43
t is another. It's conceivable, just slightly, that
Facebook could open-source all their software and not change their
behavior a bit. If someone really wants to smother you, they can
probably smother you with
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated
ting data on people's every movement is
another. It's conceivable, just slightly, that Facebook could
open-source all their software and not change their behavior a bit. If
someone really wants to smother you, they can probably smother you with
a cute photo of a kitten.
--Dave.
# distributed vi
original to:
http://sivertimes.com/richard-stallman-wants-to-destroy-facebook-to-protect-privacy/17274
original interview in Le Devoir (Montreal) (in French):
http://www.ledevoir.com/societe/actualites-en-societe/465389/eradiquer-facebook-pour-sauver-la-democratie
Richard Stallman wants
<
http://tech.firstpost.com/news-analysis/fictional-internet-policy-is-bad-for-india-good-only-for-facebook-282664.html
>
Fictional internet policy is bad for India, good only for Facebook
28 Sep 2015 , 08:26
By Eben Moglen & Mishi Choudhary
Manu Joseph is widely
Hello Nettime from sub-tropical Budapest,
This is in a recent Rhizome news
Feed my Feed: Radical publishing in Facebook Groups
DOROTHY HOWARD | Wed Jul 22nd, 2015 5:12 p.m.
These days, Facebook is so widely used that opting out constitutes an act of
defiance of the norm. The refusal
Dear nettimers,
on this day of the Facebook Farewell Party, which will be held tonight in the
National Theater in Amsterdam on Leidseplein our Institute of Network Cultures
is very proud to present the release of:
In the Facebook Aquarium—The Resistable Rise of Anarcho-Capitalism by Ippolita
Allan Resposted from Berfrois
Laurent Berlant performs as clicking
by Lauren Berlant
Today I introduced Facebook to someone older than me and had a long
conversation about what the point of networking amongst friends is.
The person was so skeptical because to her stranger
Version with formatting, links and comments:
http://gurstein.wordpress.com/2014/08/27/ooh-la-la-the-french-get-internet-n
eutrality-right-its-all-about-the-monopolies-google-amazon-facebook-twitter-
etc/
http://tinyurl.com/qzlbzwc
Ooh-la-la, the French Get (Inter)Net Neutrality Right: It's All
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part III
The Freedoms of the Net
Beyond technophobia: let's build convivial technologies together!
(section 6, continued)
Our social dimension is not necessarily defined by current technologies.
Mobile phones have become almost compulsory
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part III
The Freedoms of the Net
Beyond technophobia: let's build convivial technologies together
(section 6)
Worldwide congenital blather, the 'global tribe' imagined by McLuhan, is
now with us. Our world is now balkanized, fragmented
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part III
The Freedoms of the Net
On counter-moves and survival skills (section 3, concluded)
Technophile luddists have a rather more schizophrenic attitude. They very
much like the ease and opportunities offered by technological gadgets
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part III
The Freedoms of the Net
Orwell, Huxley, and the Sino-American model (section 2, concluded)
Profiling techniques used by Google, Facebook, and others can be applied
to improve upon the relevance of individually targeted advertisements just
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part III
The Freedoms of the Net
On-line revolution and couch activism: between myth and reality (section
#1, concluded)
The best organized repressive regimes also know how to make use of the
same methods as their dissenters, something that yet
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part Two
Anonymous, or out-of-the-box activism (section 8, continued)
Viewed from out the media, the reaction of the church of Scientology, just
as that of all Anonymous' (many) casualties afterwards, was to portray the
members of the group
With this installment, we reach the end of the second part of Ippolita
Collective's In the Facebook Aquarium. The third part ('The freedoms of
the Net') is the last one, and is only very marginally shorter than the
first and second parts.
I propose to make the next installments longer (and hence
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part Two
The Wikileaks Fracas: senseless challenge - or sensible defiance? (continued)
Back to the Wikileaks Affair. The publication on July 25th 2010, in five
major newspapers (/The New York Times/, /The Guradian/, /Der Spiegel/, /Le
Monde/, /El
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part Two
. . . . . . . . . .
NB. Three corrections made to previous installment(s):
influent influential
also, everywhere: monicker moniker
Pirate Partiet documentation: from Wikisource, not Wikipedia (note 56).
. . . . . . . . . .
The Wikileaks
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part Two
. . . . . . . . . .
NB. Three corrections made to previous installment(s):
influent influential
also, everywhere: monicker moniker
Pirate Partiet documentation: from Wikisource, not Wikipedia (note 56).
. . . . . . . . . .
The Wikileaks
Facebook Does Mind Control
FB has always done mind control.
There will never be an I don't like' button in FB. FB wants only
positive messages, better for business. All their ergonomy and
features are parts of the mind control. They want happiness and they
provoke constant interaction
With links and comments:
http://gurstein.wordpress.com/2014/07/01/facebook-does-mind-control/
Facebook Does Mind Control
Michael Gurstein
News is coming out about Facebook initiated and largely conducted social
research experiment examining the effects of various types of emotionally
loaded
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part Two
The Hacker Spirit and the disease of Anarcho-Capitalism: long time
buddies? (concluded)
(from previous installment:
In the 17th and up to the beginning of the 18th century, pirates
in the New World had a more adventurous, and also more
Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part Two
The Hacker Spirit and the disease of Anarcho-Capitalism: long time
buddies? (continued)
/Nerd supremacy/ has ancient roots. In a society that is run by
machines, it is quite logical to assume that those who master the
machines also command society. Though
very interesting talk by Fuchs, followed by exchange
Christian Fuchs
Talk at the COST Action Dynamic of Virtual Work's Workshop The
Labour Theory of Value in the Digital Age
The Open University of Israel
June 16, 2014
https://vimeo.com/98719144
# distributed via nettime: no commercial use
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium, Part Two
The Libertarian World Domination Project: Hacking, Social Network(s),
Activism and Institutional Politics
Social networks as seen through the anarcho-capitalist lens - or the
management of sociality through Big Data. (section 4, continued
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium, Part Two
The Libertarian World Domination Project: Hacking, Social Network(s),
Activism and Institutional Politics
Social networks as seen through the anarcho-capitalist lens - or the
management of sociality through Big Data. (section 4, continued
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium, Part Two
The Libertarian World Domination Project: Hacking, Social Network(s),
Activism and Institutional Politics
Section 3: Technological Darwinism from the Paypal Mafia to Facebook: the
resistible rise of anarcho-capitalism.)
(Thiel) often
Ippolita Collective, In the Facebook Aquarium Part Two, section #3
(continued)
(Section #3) Technological Darwinism from the Paypal Mafia to Facebook:
the resistible rise of anarcho-capitalism.
(...)
It is therefore appropriate to provide information on these initiatives -
actually each
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo