< https://chrisgreybrexitblog.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-brexit-aporia.html >
Friday, 31 May 2019
The Brexit aporia
Posted by Chris Grey
As anticipated [5]in my post a month ago, Britain is well on course to
squander the extension period, primarily by virtue of th
Appologies to Morlock who rightly berated those of us obsessed with arcane
No problem.
why if you live here its like staring at the Sun and proably as dangerous.
The paper?
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#
. Or to put it
another
way its a genuine ‘event’, one those moments when a system reveals itself
BECAUSE it has gone so spectacularly awry. The moment the result of the
referendum
came in it was immediately clear that there was now a BEFORE and an AFTER and
that the Brexit event would in future
of the ironies of Brexit (pointed out in a TV interview with Richard
Barbrook) is that Brexit has turned the UK from a Eurosceptic nation into
one of the most engaged and increasingly pro-EU countries in the EU! No other
European country would be able to put hundreds of thousands
on the streets waving
appening so quickly now that it is difficult to keep up
> with, let alone make sense of, them. It seems a long time ago, but was
> only last Monday, that `Bercow's Bombshell' joined the list of
> Brexit jargon that sounds like bad book titles. That intervention,
> saying that MPs
forward or clear with
little precedent for success. Also this
evening Steve Barclay deputy Chair of the the ERG (the Tory Brexit Taliban) are
already considering instruments
that could frustrate those efforts.Barnier and the EU negotiating team are also
negative..
So for the time being
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 7:46 AM Keith Hart wrote:
> “No deal can’t be taken off the table; it is the table.” You’ll hear
> this clever sound bite in Twitter feeds on both sides of the Brexit divide,
> but it suffers from the serious defect of being wrong. When we talk about
> n
“No deal can’t be taken off the table; it is the table.” You’ll hear
this clever sound bite in Twitter feeds on both sides of the Brexit divide,
but it suffers from the serious defect of being wrong. When we talk about
no deal being the table, we mean that it is the present default position
The UK Parliament just voted to take a Brexit 'no deal' off the table. But it
is the law and therefore the default
option unless the law is changed. So Parliament's motion means ‘sweet diddly
squat’. The problem is actually
a category error. You can't take no deal off the table
At last an oped piece from a former Leave staffer that at leas holds out
the hope that one of Johnson, Gove, Davies et al will not succeed May as
PM. THAT would be a true Brexit dividend.
"In the end, the hard Brexiteer perfectionists bedazzled by cake and
unicorns proved to be the obs
reply has become “I
know nothing!”
There are a few people who have not abandoned thinking about
Brexit, even if the prospects are still gloomy. Take this lucid
contribution today from Patrick Maguire, political correspondent of
the New Statesman:
Good morning. MPs have voted do
>> On 13 Mar 2019, at 10:55, Keith Hart wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 12:42 PM David Garcia
>>> wrote:
>>> A true Democracy: All United in Ignorance-
>>> Total fucking insanity
>>> When asked by what is actually happening my repl
Hello David,
The Brexit situation is indeed extraordinary, and it has thrown up deep
deficiencies in the UK's constitutional arrangements, electoral security
and, more widely, in its national identity.
For what it's worth, my money, should I care to bet on it, would be that
the UK will end
ay out it. Next time
I'll ell them, what are you doing about your creeping constitutional
crisis?" I have been banging that drum in half a dozen papers ever since,
the last once being "Brexit: where once was an empire".
When Gandhi came to Britain in 1931, he was shocked by th
y
> When asked by what is actually happening my reply has become “I know nothing!”
>
> There are a few people who have not abandoned thinking about Brexit, even if
> the prospects are still gloomy. Take this lucid contribution today from
> Patrick Maguire, political correspondent of
ho have not abandoned thinking about Brexit, even
if the prospects are still gloomy. Take this lucid contribution today from
Patrick Maguire, political correspondent of the New Statesman:
Good morning. MPs have voted down Theresa May's Brexit deal for the second
time - by a thumping margin of 149 vo
my friends is what we are calling the true democratic
dividend of Brxitania in which
all of us know progressively more and more about what we do not know.
your depressed and stupidly obsessed nettime brexit correspondent :-((
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderat
Brxitania in which
all of us know progressively more and more about what we do not know.
your depressed and stupidly obsessed nettime brexit correspondent :-((
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text
Resolving the Brexican Standoff
Don’t stop just yet Patrice just the wrong moment as we come to the final
episode of
series 1 of the neverending Brexit Box Set.
As we know May is playing Eastwood in the Mexican stand off in the Good the Bad
and the Ugly a confrontation in
which no strategy
bill soon and my right to live with my family in Paris
and move around could be seriously impeded. My bet has always been that the
UK will stay in the EU. At least I can get long odds on that.
Cheers,
Keith
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 10:16 PM Patrice Riemens wrote:
>
> Aloha,
>
> I
Aloha,
I was a Brexit addict. Till the day before yesterday. I used to spell
the Guardian online and go thru all the vagaries of that great soap. But
no longer. I might merely scan the headline, and may be even not.
I 'know' what is going to happen (even though you never can know
.
Indeed
... accompanied by the 'Smirky McSmirk Face'
that dominates all mainstream media analysis in the UK
On 16 October 2018 at 20:32, Ariston Theotocopulos <
ariston.theotocopu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is all true, you could add that the UK news media delights in
> spreading lies, it
at's where your analysis, though largely accurate, becomes
dangerous. It may help us to understand some of the structural
conditions driving nihilistic projects like Brexit, but because it
doesn't address my initial questions — why this? and why now? — it
doesn't do what's needed: help to lay a bas
This is all true, you could add that the UK news media delights in
spreading lies, it does it purely for the lulz.
But... In 2016 only political lunatics had strong opinions one way or
another on the EU, and nobody here thought that there would be any
significant change whatever the result of the
, becomes
dangerous. It may help us to understand some of the structural
conditions driving nihilistic projects like Brexit, but because it
doesn't address my initial questions — why this? and why now? — it
doesn't do what's needed: help to lay a basis for new frameworks,
institutions
battles and real news from the
misinformation and 'phony wars’.
But having said all that I am skeptical of the picture painted by JP of the
brexit enterprise as some kind of strategic
master plan. This attributes a level of strategic skill and competence that is
glaringly absent from
Hi David, Hi All,
I've been a continual participant in online discussion of the national
insanity that is Brexit, and have come to a few conclusions. For those
of you not based in the UK, the whole debate and internal conflict may
appear utterly incomprehensible - but I believe it has brought
Dear David/all.
I have never posted here before (but long been a lurker!), however this
thread on Brexit presents an opportunity to share a recent twitter thread
on Brexit, which I came to indirectly via social media. As far as I am
aware, the author of the following twitter posts is a well-known
sense, including the vulgar sense of
wanking our time away).
Actually Kier Starmer -the Captain Sensible of the Brexit narrative- is
incrementally (and with some skill) inching the Labour Party’s leadership
towards a refferendum on the deal (I dislike the sterile populism of the
‘people’s vote
I'm following this whole thread with great interest and feel that I
could add a few synthesizing comments from a strategic designer's
perspective. These designers are usually hired to be less concerned with
the creation of the perfect, shiny object but more with shaping the
structures culture
Brian writes: "Supporting them remains essential, in the way that dreams
and utopias are essential. But I think there's another responsibility,
which is to imagine and get behind the factors of sweeping systemic change,
which is what the times are callling for."
I don't think the two are mutually
On 13 Nov 2017, at 09:21, Alex Foti wrote
> The problem of the revolutions of 2011 is that they failed to produce durable
> organization and to use their term institutions of the common, save for
> limited success on the municipalist front. Now that nazi-populism is
>
Assembly by H deals with the problem of organization and exercising power
on the part of movements. Their proposal is to invert the relationship
between leadership and base, so that the democratic multitude (based on the
emerging subjectivities in wealth production and social reproduction) is in
Wendy Brown wrote:
> Insistence that 'another world is possible' runs opposite to this tide
> of general despair... The Left alone persists in a belief (or in a
polemic,
> absent a belief) that all could live well, live free, and live together
> - a dream whose abandonment is expressed in the
been that it ends up
defending the indefensible.
In the Brexit case, widespread disillusionment with a decreasingly democratic,
increasingly neoliberal central pseudo-state only found voice from those who
have other reasons to attack it: those who want to deregulate food,
pharmceuticals
ead can't help bringing
>> to mind Wendy Brown's ever more prescient work on this subject-
>> especially chapter IV
>>
>> http://www.tepotech.com/chiapas2015/Brown_Walled_States.pdf
>> <http://www.tepotech.com/chiapas2015/Brown_Walled_States.pdf&g
Back Control” is cruscial to
understand it speaks to the profound loss of agency that so
many of us feel and how for many the capacity to disrupt
politics as usual gave Brexit voters a sense of power.
This is spot on for the United States as well. Alas
rning what it never wholly loved and with the task of dramatically resetting
its critique and vision in terms of the historical supersession of liberal
democracy, and not only of failed socialist experiments.” She stated this over
10 years ago; pre-fiscal crisis, pre-Trump and Brexit.
So, rese
cruscial to understand
>>> it speaks to the profound loss of agency that so many of us feel and how
>>> for many the capacity to disrupt politics as usual gave Brexit voters a
>>> sense of power.
>>>
>>
>> This is spot on for the United States as well.
wrote:
> On 11/06/2017 05:13 AM, David Garcia wrote:
>
> The success of the slogan ‘Take Back Control” is cruscial to understand it
>> speaks to the profound loss of agency that so many of us feel and how for
>> many the capacity to disrupt politics as usual gave Brexit
On 11/06/2017 05:13 AM, David Garcia wrote:
The success of the slogan ‘Take Back Control” is cruscial to understand it
speaks to the profound loss of agency that so many of us feel and how for many
the capacity to disrupt politics as usual gave Brexit voters a sense of power.
This is spot
at elections. Brexit was part of everyday discussion in ways that have
never been the case in my life-time so as a manifestation of “demos” I think
there was something to celebrate. The other night on the train home I got into
an argument with a group of Brexit voting builders about their belief
From Sauvons l'Europe newsletter
http://sauvonsleurope.eu/brexit-hold-up-sur-la-democratie/
In French Deepl.com translated:
Brexit: Democracy robbery?
By Arthur News/editorial comment
November 6,2017
We have already written about the confiscation of the most basic
democratic principles
nt a referendum in Catalonia, despite the fact that a peaceful
>> referendum would most probably have led to a similar outcome as in Read
>> Here: https://www.socialeurope.eu/catalonia-brexit-nationalism”
>>
>> Allan
>> P Nyomtatás előtt gondoljunk a t
spite the fact that a peaceful
> referendum would most probably have led to a similar outcome as in Read Here:
> https://www.socialeurope.eu/catalonia-brexit-nationalism”
>
> Allan
> P Nyomtatás előtt gondoljunk a természetre! Please consider the environment
> before printing this email.
probably have led to a similar outcome as in Read Here:
https://www.socialeurope.eu/catalonia-brexit-nationalism”
Allan
P Nyomtatás előtt gondoljunk a természetre! Please consider the environment
before printing this email.
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
While the class is the the primary divider, there are collateral
divisions in the Left that are few (causal) generations removed from the
class but extremely effective. These divisions are actively and
successfully nurtured: educational and academic echo chambers, identity
politics and related
lmost everyone I care about. I feel nothing at all about them, still
less for the millions of people they conned and called it democracy.
It’s all catastrophically sad, and it’s going to be sad for a very long
time."
Brexit is truly the end-of-the-road for Europe. Theresa May, meaning
Either public debt is too high or public spending is too low/"austerity"
too harsh, she can't have both.
I don't think that economic woes are a good rationale to justify
anti-continental sentiment and the resulting brexit.
On 04.04.2017 15:31, barbara strebel wrote:
>War of
War of Nerves Laurie Penny, March 29
Brexit, Pursued by Despair
Brexit is just the latest alibi to mask the austerity con
https://thebaffler.com/war-of-nerves/brexit-austerity-penny
Brexit is just the latest alibi to mask the austerity conThe referendum
was the flame
Original to:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/03/games-brexit-escapism-halo-animal-crossing-mario
If only Brexit had been a game
Current real-world politics remind us why so many prefer the ordered
fairness of gaming
During the run-up to the general election, my children and I
On 06/25/2016 10:30 PM, siegel allan wrote:
the present moment is simply a prologue marking more critical
struggles that lay beyond our immediate horizon or sense of the
possible
Man, that's the interesting thing.
[Allan and I met each other in Budapest for the first time a few weeks
ago
eless, indicates an important
frame of reference in regards to the implications of the Brexit vote. Like the
’68 events, and more generally the political movements that flowered during the
post-war period (including the revolutionary movements in Africa and Latin
America as well as the civil r
53 matches
Mail list logo