-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/07/14 02:29 AM, Felix Stalder wrote:
Now this is obviously the roughest of ballpark estimates you can
make -- and I would be happy to see a better one -- but on the face
of it, it seems to indicate that viewing one personal data as an
On 07/24/2014 17:51, Wolfie Christl wrote:
Maybe the other way round: If users would have been paid for
their data, business models driven by personal data would be less
attractive or would look different at least
Hi Wolfie,
you are right, paying individual users for their personal data
What if Facebook users, or users In general get their personal
data licensed say under GNU/GPL, and create conflict with user
contracts, and take the issue to collective level with the help of
wider alliances, by collectivizing users' individual cases, viral
campaigning and strike like creative
I think the market vale of all that time the users are spending on
Facebook is actually zero, since that's what Facebook is paying for it
right now.
More dangerously, Facebook could counter by arguing that they have
created free infrastructure for organizing gatherings, publicizing
products and
On 24.07.2014 11:29, Felix Stalder wrote:
If you divide the 30 cents income by the 60 hours work, the you end up
with an hourly-wage of $.005.
Now this is obviously the roughest of ballpark estimates you can make --
and I would be happy to see a better one -- but on the face of it,
it seems
Dear Felix
I'm afraid you are mixing up value of personal data and value of time
spend filling a service with this data.
related, two demands on the User Rights:
The Right to get Revenue
http://userrights.contemporary-home-computing.org/u0ibb/
The right to be the (prime) beneficiary of
Felix says:
Now this is obviously the roughest of ballpark estimates you can make --
and I would be happy to see a better one -- but on the face of it,
it seems to indicate that viewing one personal data as an economic asset
is really a lousy idea, no matter how you slice it.
Well, if you were
