On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 07:54 +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
>
> > > 2. Delete the old aes_* interface, in favor of aes128_, aes192_*
> > > and
> > >aes256_*.
> >
> > I've now made a branch for this, delete-old-aes.
>
> And it seems building gnutls wit
Hello,
2018-02-22 13:41 GMT+03:00 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos :
> On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 07:54 +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
>> ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> Thanks for bringing that up. I have a quick fix for that, although I no
> longer have such systems for checking.
Do you need one?
On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 13:51 +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2018-02-22 13:41 GMT+03:00 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos :
> > On Thu, 2018-02-22 at 07:54 +0100, Niels Möller wrote:
> > > ni...@lysator.liu.se (Niels Möller) writes:
> > Thanks for bringing that up. I have a quick fix for t
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos writes:
> How widely used are these macros? Searching debian code:
> https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=aes_set_encrypt_key&page=1&perpkg=1
>
> seems to show gnutls (in fips140 drbg code), stoken, qemu, rdup,
> filezilla, pike, cmake, uanytun, haskell-bindings-nettle,