Maamoun TK writes:
> It's needed for both, I just give ppc64 as an example.
I see.
And I just pushed the change to enable big-endian too.
Regards,
/Niels
--
Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid 368C6677.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:26 PM Niels Möller wrote:
> Does that mean that explicitly
> setting QEMU_LD_PREFIX is needed only for ppc64 (big-endian), but not
> for ppc64el?
>
It's needed for both, I just give ppc64 as an example.
___
nettle-bugs
Maamoun TK writes:
> Is nettle-dev:ppe64el installed in the image?
> If not installed, there is no point in removing it.
There was a loop over all archs. But I guess I should just remove ppc64
from that list. I was a bit in a hurry to get something working.
> I have no experience modifying
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:15 PM Niels Möller wrote:
> I've committed a change based on this patch. I dropped big-endian ppc
> support for now (the "apt-get remove nettle-dev:$arch" failed because
> it's not an arch in official debian. Not sure if that was the only
> problem, but I wanted to get
Maamoun TK writes:
> To run tests on ppc64 and ppc64el, this patch install cross building
> packages for both architectures on the Debian image, these packages will be
> install every time the CI triggered. A proper fix would be to install these
> packages to the image directly.
I've committed
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 10:43 AM Niels Möller wrote:
Speaking of ppc64 (big-endian, I assume) vs ppc64el, do you think it's
> possible and reasonable to use same assembly files? That's how the
> current ARM big-endian support works.
>
Yes, that is what I'm working on. nettle has IF_LE and IF_BE
Maamoun TK writes:
> To run tests on ppc64 and ppc64el, this patch install cross building
> packages for both architectures on the Debian image,
Speaking of ppc64 (big-endian, I assume) vs ppc64el, do you think it's
possible and reasonable to use same assembly files? That's how the
current ARM
Hi,
I no longer talk for the gnutls developers, but why don't you submit an MR at:
https://gitlab.com/gnutls/build-images/
to add a ppc64le image? If you mention that this is used by nettle, I
doubt there will be an objection to it. That way you can use it
directly for testing nettle.
regards,