On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 08:51 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> Dan Williams writes:
>
> > Well, if we're going to add rawip support, why bother emulating a
> > netdev at all?
>
> (assuming you mean etherdev - we'll need the netdev in any case :)
>
> Good question. Asked before, but I
Am 25.11.2015 um 11:12 schrieb Bjørn Mork:
Bjørn Mork writes:
But I believe I implemented it the last time this was discussed. I'll
see if I can dig up the old code for a demo. Not going to rush this
anyway. I'd like everyone to be happy with the result. And it's going
to
25.11.2015 18:11, Thomas Haller пишет:
> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 15:36 +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
>> Thomas Haller on Wed, 2015/11/25 15:11:
>>> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:53 +0100, Christian Hess wrote:
From: Christian Hesse
It is possible to use
Thomas Schäfer writes:
> Am 25.11.2015 um 11:12 schrieb Bjørn Mork:
>> Bjørn Mork writes:
>>
>>> But I believe I implemented it the last time this was discussed. I'll
>>> see if I can dig up the old code for a demo. Not going to rush this
>>> anyway. I'd
Dan Williams writes:
> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 08:51 +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
>> The only "real" objection I once had was that I don't think there are
>> any DHCP clients on Linux that will work with such an interface. But
>> that is a lousy excuse. Using DHCP here is another bad
Am 25.11.2015 um 11:53 schrieb Christian Hess:
> From: Christian Hesse
>
> It is possible to use systemd-networkd for some general network setup
> (rename devices, ...) even for devices that are managed by
> NetworkManager later.
> Since systemd 228 the behaviour changed that
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 15:36 +0100, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Thomas Haller on Wed, 2015/11/25 15:11:
> > On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:53 +0100, Christian Hess wrote:
> > > From: Christian Hesse
> > >
> > > It is possible to use systemd-networkd for some general
Bjørn Mork writes:
> But I believe I implemented it the last time this was discussed. I'll
> see if I can dig up the old code for a demo. Not going to rush this
> anyway. I'd like everyone to be happy with the result. And it's going
> to be immutable once it's in.
git is a
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 09:45 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 02:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Hi
>
> > Shouldn't libnm.pc have
> > Requires: NetworkManager >= 1.0.8
>
> Yeah maybe, I dunno. Lubomir?
Ah, got it now...
As detailed before, NetworkManager in this case means
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 02:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 23.11.2015 um 18:20 schrieb Lubomir Rintel:
> > I'm pleased to announce the release of NetworkManager 1.0.8, the
> > latest stable release in the 1.0.x series. We recommend that users
> > of 1.0.x series as well as users of older
From: Christian Hesse
It is possible to use systemd-networkd for some general network setup
(rename devices, ...) even for devices that are managed by
NetworkManager later.
Since systemd 228 the behaviour changed that systemd-networkd drops
foreign configuration from devices. It
Hi Thomas
Am 25.11.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Thomas Haller:
> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 09:45 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 02:46 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Hi
>>
>>> Shouldn't libnm.pc have
>>> Requires: NetworkManager >= 1.0.8
>>
>> Yeah maybe, I dunno. Lubomir?
>
> Ah, got
Am 25.11.2015 um 13:46 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 25.11.2015 um 09:49 schrieb Thomas Haller:
>> Thus it's correct to have no "Requires".
>
> As I tried to explain,
> /usr/include/libnm/nm-version.h (from libnm) does actually include a
> header from a legacy library. So it would be broken
Thomas Haller on Wed, 2015/11/25 15:11:
> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:53 +0100, Christian Hess wrote:
> > From: Christian Hesse
> >
> > It is possible to use systemd-networkd for some general network setup
> > (rename devices, ...) even for devices that are
On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 11:53 +0100, Christian Hess wrote:
> From: Christian Hesse
>
> It is possible to use systemd-networkd for some general network setup
> (rename devices, ...) even for devices that are managed by
> NetworkManager later.
> Since systemd 228 the behaviour changed
15 matches
Mail list logo