Alan Mintz wrote:
>At 2009-11-18 03:26, you wrote:
I have a number of apartment complexes to map...
>>>
>>>When I started mapping, I asked a similar question. Based on the
>>>responses
>>>I got and other features, I use a site relation. Example:
>>>http://osm.org/go/TaBoJz7Oq-
>>
>> Great e
That area is another community centre, I thought I'd tagged it but
maybe not.
Accuracy wise, the google map is outdated in my area, the school has
had old wasteground cleared to make up more grass area for them.
Mapping has been done for the buildings, purely from waypoints, and
images take
Hello All,
I am very new to OSM. I attended my first mapping party in my area,
and now I am trying to finish uploading some of the data from my
traces. I only have a couple of waypoints, because I am slow like
that. Now I am tagging my points on Potlatch and trying to learn for
myself. Unfortu
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> If it's a private road, I'm less inclined to call it a tertiary.
> "unclassified" doesn't sound bad in this case.
>
> Given that the primary, secondary and tertiary designations belong to
> the national, state and county/city/forest service/B
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Karl wrote:
> Could someone take a look at it all, specifically the church and give me
> some comments.
Looking better from afar! It's difficult to know how well you are
doing at mapping what is on the ground as we aren't familiar with the
area. However, compari
James Ewen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>> James Ewen wrote:
>>
>>> I prefer the main roads in the bush being tagged as tertiary, because
>>> they then become a useful addition to the map database.
>>
>> I tend to agree with that opinion if they're a referenced hi
On 11/23/2009 10:55 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
> Charlotte's original question about marking western, major, unpaved
> roads as tertiary seems reasonable given that description. With a
> planet as diverse and project as large as ours, it would be madness to
> expect precisely uniform tagging from p
Sounds to me like the best solution is:
highway=tertiary
surface=dirt (or gravel or whatever)
unfortunately, the current renderers don't do anything with the surface tag.
Hopefully in the future they will though. In my opinion, the relative
importance of a road should factor more heavily into
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
wrote:
> Potlatch can handle waypoints, they show up as special POIs you have
> to unlock to turn into actual nodes in the database.
>
> What it doesn't handle, or more specifically the GPX import script, is
> GPX tracks that only have a wa
En/na Xan ha escrit:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any web gui for translating like launchpad for openstreetmap.
> Perhaps a web gui could be useful for translating a bulk of names at
> once. Instead of localezing first the object, check if there are
> translated or not and translate.
>
I'm refering to
Hi,
Is there any web gui for translating like launchpad for openstreetmap.
Perhaps a web gui could be useful for translating a bulk of names at
once. Instead of localezing first the object, check if there are
translated or not and translate.
If you look it right, can I upload the names to laun
Thanks for all the constructive criticism their. Following the advice
I've redrawn most of the areas to share nodes, and completely re done
some tags. The church has also been completely re done, as I wasn't
happy with it.
Could someone take a look at it all, specifically the church and give m
Richard,
Thanks once again for creating and supporting such a great tool for OSM work!
I look forward to seeing the new toys in v2.0.
James
On 11/23/09, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm pleased to announce Potlatch 1.3 - a new version with one major
> improvement.
>
> Potlatch now le
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 11/21/2009 12:11 AM, James Ewen wrote:
>> I guess you missed the rest of my post where I described these
>> roads. [ ... ]
> Is there something wrong with using highway=unclassified for these?
For the purposes of the newbies list, it is wo
On 11/21/2009 12:11 AM, James Ewen wrote:
> I guess you missed the rest of my post where I described these
> roads... many are privately owned, and therefore NOT a referenced
> highway belonging to the government, but rather a private road owned
> by a privately held company. They are however avail
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:57 AM, James Ewen wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Cartinus wrote:
>
>
>> The layer tag is not for painting in the renderer. The layer tag is to tell
>> us
>> things are physically above/below each other.
>
>
> Seriously, you have got to be joking. There is n
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce Potlatch 1.3 - a new version with one major
improvement.
Potlatch now lets you zoom in as far as zoom level 23. Previous
versions only went up to z19, and even then with some loss of
positional accuracy.
This makes Potlatch much more suitable for tracing bui
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> It's also really useful to be able to
> zoom into your imagery past z18 which Potlatch can't do.
I wrote a long post explaining why this was, then figured I might have a
go at seeing if it was fixable instead. So just wait for 1.3 which
should be along real soon
18 matches
Mail list logo
