On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 03:26:02PM -0600, james wahlig wrote:
> Looks alright to me.
Thank you.
--
Marcel Telka
Solaris RPE
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 11:56:50AM -0600, james wahlig wrote:
> I started looking at this a while ago, but got distracted... There is
> really only one important change in nfs_client.c, right? The rest are
And the exactly same in nfs4_client.c file.
> just cstyle things?
Yes.
--
Marcel T
Looks alright to me.
jim
Marcel Telka wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Nobody interested? :-(
>Is there anything important missing what prevents you to do a review?
>
>Thanks.
>
>On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:46:49PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I prepared fix for:
>>
>>6758280 nfs_async_manager d
I started looking at this a while ago, but got distracted... There is
really only one important change in nfs_client.c, right? The rest are
just cstyle things?
I should be done before the end of the day.
jim
Marcel Telka wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Nobody interested? :-(
>Is there anything important
Hi all,
Nobody interested? :-(
Is there anything important missing what prevents you to do a review?
Thanks.
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 07:46:49PM +0100, Marcel Telka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I prepared fix for:
>
> 6758280 nfs_async_manager doesn't schedule nfs_async_start even if async reqs
> are enque
Hi,
I prepared fix for:
6758280 nfs_async_manager doesn't schedule nfs_async_start even if async reqs
are enqueued
webrev: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~aragorn/6758280/
root cause: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~aragorn/6758280.root_cause
Short root cause summary:
There is a race condition between n
