On 2/13/18 1:21 AM, Malahal Naineni wrote:
If your latency is high, then you most likely need to change
Dispatch_Max_Reqs_Xprt. What your Dispatch_Max_Reqs_Xprt value?
That shouldn't do anything anymore in V2.6, other than 9P.
--
Also keep in mind that FSAL VFS can never, by it's very nature, beat
knfsd, since it has to do everything knfsd does, but also has userspace
<-> kernespace transitions. Ganesha's strength is exporting
userspace-based cluster filesystems.
That said, we're always working to make Ganesha faster,
What version are you running? Significant improvements have been made in
V2.6 (which is close to being tagged V2.6.0).
Frank
From: Deepak Jagtap [mailto:deepak.jag...@maxta.com]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 4:01 PM
To: nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Nfs-ganesha-devel]
What FSAL? Is the test anything other than creating a large number of files
(how many?) and then doing a readdir and comparing?
Frank
From: Pradeep [mailto:pradeeptho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 5:36 PM
To: nfs-ganesha-devel
Subject: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] READDIR doesn't ret
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:01:04AM +, Deepak Jagtap wrote:
> I ran few performance tests to compare nfs gansha and nfs kernel server and
> noticed significant difference.
What is the actual test?
What are the export options in the knfsd case?
Is there any reason you're testing ext3 instead
Hi Matt,
I am using v2.5-stable branch for this evaluation.
Regards,
Deepak
From: Matt Benjamin
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 8:02:12 PM
To: Deepak Jagtap
Cc: nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] nfs ganesha vs nfs kerne
