Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
Right, 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name Went into 2.6 AFTER Bill’s Napalm. I couldn’t make enough sense of what had changed to confidently do a backport… The messiness in CMakeLists.txt with multiple different changes was one of the reasons Bill’s Napalm got delayed a week… Frank From: Matt Benjamin [mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 2:15 PM To: Frank Filz Cc: Malahal Naineni ; Soumya Koduri ; nfs-ganesha-devel Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 I'm confused, napalm is 2.6-dev, not 2.5.x On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote: Actually, the problem was Bill’s Napalm… I was able to make sense of the manual merge for ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpc But not for 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name I pushed my results to https://github.com/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable Frank From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 10:39 AM To: Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > Cc: Matt Benjamin mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> >; Soumya Koduri mailto:skod...@redhat.com> >; nfs-ganesha-devel mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 I did but the failover/failback code re-org looked like contributed, but I am not positive. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote: Hmm, did you cherry pick in the original order? I’ll take a look at this later today. Frank From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 11:34 PM To: Matt Benjamin mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> > Cc: Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> >; Soumya Koduri mailto:skod...@redhat.com> >; nfs-ganesha-devel mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 Dan, I backported everything that was needed except the following 2 as I don't want to mess with cmake! Can you please quickly send ported patches? Appreciate your help. The latest V2.5 code is at my personal github branch V2.5-stable: https://github.com/malahal/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable The following 2 commits failed to apply: 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpc On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Matt Benjamin mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> > wrote: Hi Frank, On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote: > Oh, nice. > > > Matt, what about this one? > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified RHCS doesn't officially support this, but I'd say it would be nice to have. Matt > > > > Frank > > > > > > From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ] > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:28 AM > To: Soumya Koduri mailto:skod...@redhat.com> > > Cc: Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> >; > d...@redhat.com <mailto:d...@redhat.com> ; Matt Benjamin > mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> >; nfs-ganesha-devel > <mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying > "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with > "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special > branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your > SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you > are interested in. > > > > Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back ported. > Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow and > publish the branch, if there are no comments... > > > > 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball > name" > > 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup > > 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir > > 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > b862fe360 SAL: ex
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
I'm confused, napalm is 2.6-dev, not 2.5.x On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > Actually, the problem was Bill’s Napalm… > > > > I was able to make sense of the manual merge for > > > > ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not > using system ntirpc > > > > But not for > > > > 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' > generate the correct tarball name > > > > I pushed my results to > > > > https://github.com/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable > > > > Frank > > > > *From:* Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2017 10:39 AM > *To:* Frank Filz > *Cc:* Matt Benjamin ; Soumya Koduri < > skod...@redhat.com>; nfs-ganesha-devel sourceforge.net> > > *Subject:* Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > I did but the failover/failback code re-org looked like contributed, but I > am not positive. > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Frank Filz > wrote: > > Hmm, did you cherry pick in the original order? > > > > I’ll take a look at this later today. > > > > Frank > > > > *From:* Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2017 11:34 PM > *To:* Matt Benjamin > *Cc:* Frank Filz ; Soumya Koduri < > skod...@redhat.com>; nfs-ganesha-devel sourceforge.net> > > > *Subject:* Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > Dan, I backported everything that was needed except the following 2 as I > don't want to mess with cmake! Can you please quickly send ported patches? > Appreciate your help. The latest V2.5 code is at my personal github branch > V2.5-stable: > > > > https://github.com/malahal/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable > > > > The following 2 commits failed to apply: > > > > 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' > generate the correct tarball name > > ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not > using system ntirpc > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Matt Benjamin > wrote: > > Hi Frank, > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Filz > wrote: > > Oh, nice. > > > > > > > Matt, what about this one? > > > > > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > RHCS doesn't officially support this, but I'd say it would be nice to have. > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > Frank > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:28 AM > > To: Soumya Koduri > > Cc: Frank Filz ; d...@redhat.com; Matt Benjamin > > ; nfs-ganesha-devel > > > > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > > > > > I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying > > "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with > > "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special > > branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your > > SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you > > are interested in. > > > > > > > > Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back > ported. > > Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow > and > > publish the branch, if there are no comments... > > > > > > > > 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball > > name" > > > > 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup > > > > 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir > > > > 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > > > b862fe360 SAL: extract fs logic from nfs4_recovery > > > > c29114162 Napalm dispatch plus plus > > > > c8bc40b69 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name > > > > cb787a1cf SAL: introduce new recovery backend based on rados kv store > > > > eadfc762e New (empty) sample config > > > > eb4eea134 config: add new config options for rados_kv recovery backend > > > > fbc905015 cmake: make mo
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
Actually, the problem was Bill’s Napalm… I was able to make sense of the manual merge for ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpc But not for 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name I pushed my results to https://github.com/ffilz/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable Frank From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 10:39 AM To: Frank Filz Cc: Matt Benjamin ; Soumya Koduri ; nfs-ganesha-devel Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 I did but the failover/failback code re-org looked like contributed, but I am not positive. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote: Hmm, did you cherry pick in the original order? I’ll take a look at this later today. Frank From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 11:34 PM To: Matt Benjamin mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> > Cc: Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> >; Soumya Koduri mailto:skod...@redhat.com> >; nfs-ganesha-devel mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 Dan, I backported everything that was needed except the following 2 as I don't want to mess with cmake! Can you please quickly send ported patches? Appreciate your help. The latest V2.5 code is at my personal github branch V2.5-stable: https://github.com/malahal/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable The following 2 commits failed to apply: 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpc On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Matt Benjamin mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> > wrote: Hi Frank, On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote: > Oh, nice. > > > Matt, what about this one? > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified RHCS doesn't officially support this, but I'd say it would be nice to have. Matt > > > > Frank > > > > > > From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ] > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:28 AM > To: Soumya Koduri mailto:skod...@redhat.com> > > Cc: Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> >; > d...@redhat.com <mailto:d...@redhat.com> ; Matt Benjamin > mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> >; nfs-ganesha-devel > <mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying > "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with > "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special > branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your > SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you > are interested in. > > > > Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back ported. > Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow and > publish the branch, if there are no comments... > > > > 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball > name" > > 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup > > 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir > > 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > b862fe360 SAL: extract fs logic from nfs4_recovery > > c29114162 Napalm dispatch plus plus > > c8bc40b69 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name > > cb787a1cf SAL: introduce new recovery backend based on rados kv store > > eadfc762e New (empty) sample config > > eb4eea134 config: add new config options for rados_kv recovery backend > > fbc905015 cmake: make modulized recovery backends compile as modules > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Soumya Koduri <mailto:skod...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > >> commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 >> FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free >> > > Yes > > On 08/09/2017 08:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > > 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for > readdir > > Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for so
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
Ok, I’ll have a look at backporting this afternoon. Frank From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 10:39 AM To: Frank Filz Cc: Matt Benjamin ; Soumya Koduri ; nfs-ganesha-devel Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 I did but the failover/failback code re-org looked like contributed, but I am not positive. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote: Hmm, did you cherry pick in the original order? I’ll take a look at this later today. Frank From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 11:34 PM To: Matt Benjamin mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> > Cc: Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> >; Soumya Koduri mailto:skod...@redhat.com> >; nfs-ganesha-devel mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 Dan, I backported everything that was needed except the following 2 as I don't want to mess with cmake! Can you please quickly send ported patches? Appreciate your help. The latest V2.5 code is at my personal github branch V2.5-stable: https://github.com/malahal/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable The following 2 commits failed to apply: 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpc On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Matt Benjamin mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> > wrote: Hi Frank, On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote: > Oh, nice. > > > Matt, what about this one? > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified RHCS doesn't officially support this, but I'd say it would be nice to have. Matt > > > > Frank > > > > > > From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ] > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:28 AM > To: Soumya Koduri mailto:skod...@redhat.com> > > Cc: Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> >; > d...@redhat.com <mailto:d...@redhat.com> ; Matt Benjamin > mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> >; nfs-ganesha-devel > <mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying > "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with > "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special > branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your > SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you > are interested in. > > > > Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back ported. > Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow and > publish the branch, if there are no comments... > > > > 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball > name" > > 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup > > 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir > > 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > b862fe360 SAL: extract fs logic from nfs4_recovery > > c29114162 Napalm dispatch plus plus > > c8bc40b69 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name > > cb787a1cf SAL: introduce new recovery backend based on rados kv store > > eadfc762e New (empty) sample config > > eb4eea134 config: add new config options for rados_kv recovery backend > > fbc905015 cmake: make modulized recovery backends compile as modules > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Soumya Koduri <mailto:skod...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > >> commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 >> FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free >> > > Yes > > On 08/09/2017 08:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > > 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for > readdir > > Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for some use cases. > I'd rather it go into stable than end up separately backported for > downstream. > > > Right..as it is more of a new feature, wrt upstream we wanted it to be part > of only 2.6 on wards so as not to break stable branch (in case if there are > nit issues). > > But yes we may end up back-porting to down
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
I did but the failover/failback code re-org looked like contributed, but I am not positive. On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > Hmm, did you cherry pick in the original order? > > > > I’ll take a look at this later today. > > > > Frank > > > > *From:* Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2017 11:34 PM > *To:* Matt Benjamin > *Cc:* Frank Filz ; Soumya Koduri < > skod...@redhat.com>; nfs-ganesha-devel sourceforge.net> > > *Subject:* Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > Dan, I backported everything that was needed except the following 2 as I > don't want to mess with cmake! Can you please quickly send ported patches? > Appreciate your help. The latest V2.5 code is at my personal github branch > V2.5-stable: > > > > https://github.com/malahal/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable > > > > The following 2 commits failed to apply: > > > > 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' > generate the correct tarball name > > ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not > using system ntirpc > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Matt Benjamin > wrote: > > Hi Frank, > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Filz > wrote: > > Oh, nice. > > > > > > > Matt, what about this one? > > > > > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > RHCS doesn't officially support this, but I'd say it would be nice to have. > > Matt > > > > > > > > > > Frank > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:28 AM > > To: Soumya Koduri > > Cc: Frank Filz ; d...@redhat.com; Matt Benjamin > > ; nfs-ganesha-devel > > > > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > > > > > I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying > > "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with > > "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special > > branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your > > SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you > > are interested in. > > > > > > > > Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back > ported. > > Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow > and > > publish the branch, if there are no comments... > > > > > > > > 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball > > name" > > > > 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup > > > > 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir > > > > 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > > > b862fe360 SAL: extract fs logic from nfs4_recovery > > > > c29114162 Napalm dispatch plus plus > > > > c8bc40b69 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name > > > > cb787a1cf SAL: introduce new recovery backend based on rados kv store > > > > eadfc762e New (empty) sample config > > > > eb4eea134 config: add new config options for rados_kv recovery backend > > > > fbc905015 cmake: make modulized recovery backends compile as modules > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Soumya Koduri > wrote: > > > > > >> commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 > >> FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free > >> > > > > Yes > > > > On 08/09/2017 08:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > > > > 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for > > readdir > > > > Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for some use > cases. > > I'd rather it go into stable than end up separately backported for > > downstream. > > > > > > Right..as it is more of a new feature, wrt upstream we wanted it to be > part > > of only 2.6 on wards so as not to break stable branch (in case if there > are > > nit issues). > > > > But yes we may end up back-porting to downstream if we do not rebase to > 2.6 > >
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
Hmm, did you cherry pick in the original order? I’ll take a look at this later today. Frank From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 11:34 PM To: Matt Benjamin Cc: Frank Filz ; Soumya Koduri ; nfs-ganesha-devel Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 Dan, I backported everything that was needed except the following 2 as I don't want to mess with cmake! Can you please quickly send ported patches? Appreciate your help. The latest V2.5 code is at my personal github branch V2.5-stable: https://github.com/malahal/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable The following 2 commits failed to apply: 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpc On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Matt Benjamin mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> > wrote: Hi Frank, On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> > wrote: > Oh, nice. > > > Matt, what about this one? > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified RHCS doesn't officially support this, but I'd say it would be nice to have. Matt > > > > Frank > > > > > > From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com <mailto:mala...@gmail.com> ] > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:28 AM > To: Soumya Koduri mailto:skod...@redhat.com> > > Cc: Frank Filz mailto:ffilz...@mindspring.com> >; > d...@redhat.com <mailto:d...@redhat.com> ; Matt Benjamin > mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com> >; nfs-ganesha-devel > <mailto:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying > "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with > "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special > branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your > SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you > are interested in. > > > > Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back ported. > Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow and > publish the branch, if there are no comments... > > > > 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball > name" > > 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup > > 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir > > 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > b862fe360 SAL: extract fs logic from nfs4_recovery > > c29114162 Napalm dispatch plus plus > > c8bc40b69 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name > > cb787a1cf SAL: introduce new recovery backend based on rados kv store > > eadfc762e New (empty) sample config > > eb4eea134 config: add new config options for rados_kv recovery backend > > fbc905015 cmake: make modulized recovery backends compile as modules > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Soumya Koduri <mailto:skod...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > >> commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 >> FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free >> > > Yes > > On 08/09/2017 08:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > > 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for > readdir > > Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for some use cases. > I'd rather it go into stable than end up separately backported for > downstream. > > > Right..as it is more of a new feature, wrt upstream we wanted it to be part > of only 2.6 on wards so as not to break stable branch (in case if there are > nit issues). > > But yes we may end up back-porting to downstream if we do not rebase to 2.6 > by then. > > Thanks, > Soumya > > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > <mailto:Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > > > > > Virus-free. www.avast.com <http://www.avast.com> > > -
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
Dan, I backported everything that was needed except the following 2 as I don't want to mess with cmake! Can you please quickly send ported patches? Appreciate your help. The latest V2.5 code is at my personal github branch V2.5-stable: https://github.com/malahal/nfs-ganesha/commits/V2.5-stable The following 2 commits failed to apply: 6bd32da613e26a768ac1dc4db1001395bd10c295 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name ff98ea64b6d1228443a35b2f7ceb3c61c0a0c1d1 Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpc On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Matt Benjamin wrote: > Hi Frank, > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Filz > wrote: > > Oh, nice. > > > > > > > Matt, what about this one? > > > > > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > RHCS doesn't officially support this, but I'd say it would be nice to have. > > Matt > > > > > > > > > Frank > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:28 AM > > To: Soumya Koduri > > Cc: Frank Filz ; d...@redhat.com; Matt Benjamin > > ; nfs-ganesha-devel > > > > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > > > > > I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying > > "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with > > "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special > > branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your > > SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you > > are interested in. > > > > > > > > Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back > ported. > > Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow > and > > publish the branch, if there are no comments... > > > > > > > > 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball > > name" > > > > 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup > > > > 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir > > > > 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > > > b862fe360 SAL: extract fs logic from nfs4_recovery > > > > c29114162 Napalm dispatch plus plus > > > > c8bc40b69 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name > > > > cb787a1cf SAL: introduce new recovery backend based on rados kv store > > > > eadfc762e New (empty) sample config > > > > eb4eea134 config: add new config options for rados_kv recovery backend > > > > fbc905015 cmake: make modulized recovery backends compile as modules > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Soumya Koduri > wrote: > > > > > >> commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 > >> FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free > >> > > > > Yes > > > > On 08/09/2017 08:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > > > > 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for > > readdir > > > > Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for some use > cases. > > I'd rather it go into stable than end up separately backported for > > downstream. > > > > > > Right..as it is more of a new feature, wrt upstream we wanted it to be > part > > of only 2.6 on wards so as not to break stable branch (in case if there > are > > nit issues). > > > > But yes we may end up back-porting to downstream if we do not rebase to > 2.6 > > by then. > > > > Thanks, > > Soumya > > > > > > > > > -- > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > ___ > > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > > > > > > > > > > Virus-free. www.avast.com > > > > > -- > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > ___ > > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > > > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
Hi Frank, On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > Oh, nice. > > > Matt, what about this one? > > > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified RHCS doesn't officially support this, but I'd say it would be nice to have. Matt > > > > Frank > > > > > > From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:28 AM > To: Soumya Koduri > Cc: Frank Filz ; d...@redhat.com; Matt Benjamin > ; nfs-ganesha-devel > > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying > "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with > "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special > branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your > SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you > are interested in. > > > > Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back ported. > Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow and > publish the branch, if there are no comments... > > > > 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball > name" > > 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup > > 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir > > 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM > > 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified > > b862fe360 SAL: extract fs logic from nfs4_recovery > > c29114162 Napalm dispatch plus plus > > c8bc40b69 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name > > cb787a1cf SAL: introduce new recovery backend based on rados kv store > > eadfc762e New (empty) sample config > > eb4eea134 config: add new config options for rados_kv recovery backend > > fbc905015 cmake: make modulized recovery backends compile as modules > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: > > >> commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 >> FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free >> > > Yes > > On 08/09/2017 08:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > > 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for > readdir > > Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for some use cases. > I'd rather it go into stable than end up separately backported for > downstream. > > > Right..as it is more of a new feature, wrt upstream we wanted it to be part > of only 2.6 on wards so as not to break stable branch (in case if there are > nit issues). > > But yes we may end up back-porting to downstream if we do not rebase to 2.6 > by then. > > Thanks, > Soumya > > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > > > > > Virus-free. www.avast.com > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
Oh, nice. I think the following would be good to backport also since they help packaging: 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM eadfc762e New (empty) sample config Matt, what about this one? 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified Frank From: Malahal Naineni [mailto:mala...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:28 AM To: Soumya Koduri Cc: Frank Filz ; d...@redhat.com; Matt Benjamin ; nfs-ganesha-devel Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you are interested in. Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back ported. Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow and publish the branch, if there are no comments... 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name" 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified b862fe360 SAL: extract fs logic from nfs4_recovery c29114162 Napalm dispatch plus plus c8bc40b69 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name cb787a1cf SAL: introduce new recovery backend based on rados kv store eadfc762e New (empty) sample config eb4eea134 config: add new config options for rados_kv recovery backend fbc905015 cmake: make modulized recovery backends compile as modules On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Soumya Koduri mailto:skod...@redhat.com> > wrote: > commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 > FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free > Yes On 08/09/2017 08:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote: 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for some use cases. I'd rather it go into stable than end up separately backported for downstream. Right..as it is more of a new feature, wrt upstream we wanted it to be part of only 2.6 on wards so as not to break stable branch (in case if there are nit issues). But yes we may end up back-porting to downstream if we do not rebase to 2.6 by then. Thanks, Soumya -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
I pushed a notes branch "refs/notes/backport" which has a note saying "backport to V2.5". You should be able to fetch this special branch with "git fetch origin refs/notes/*:refs/notes/*". After fetching this special branch, you should do "export GIT_NOTES_REF=refs/notes/backport" in your SHELL and then run the usual "git log" to see if I missed any commits you are interested in. Alternatively, the following are the commits that will NOT be back ported. Let me know if you need any of these. I will cherry pick things tomorrow and publish the branch, if there are no comments... 00b9e0798 Revert "CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name" 1b60d5df2 FSAL_MEM - fix UP thread init/cleanup 39119aab0 FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir 4b4e21ed9 Manpage - Fix installing manpages in RPM 814e9cd65 FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket specified b862fe360 SAL: extract fs logic from nfs4_recovery c29114162 Napalm dispatch plus plus c8bc40b69 CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name cb787a1cf SAL: introduce new recovery backend based on rados kv store eadfc762e New (empty) sample config eb4eea134 config: add new config options for rados_kv recovery backend fbc905015 cmake: make modulized recovery backends compile as modules On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: > > > commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 > > FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free > > > > Yes > > On 08/09/2017 08:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote: > >> 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for >>> readdir >>> >> Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for some use >> cases. >> I'd rather it go into stable than end up separately backported for >> downstream. >> >> > Right..as it is more of a new feature, wrt upstream we wanted it to be > part of only 2.6 on wards so as not to break stable branch (in case if > there are nit issues). > > But yes we may end up back-porting to downstream if we do not rebase to > 2.6 by then. > > Thanks, > Soumya > > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
> commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 > FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free > Yes On 08/09/2017 08:57 PM, Frank Filz wrote: 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for readdir Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for some use cases. I'd rather it go into stable than end up separately backported for downstream. Right..as it is more of a new feature, wrt upstream we wanted it to be part of only 2.6 on wards so as not to break stable branch (in case if there are nit issues). But yes we may end up back-porting to downstream if we do not rebase to 2.6 by then. Thanks, Soumya -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
> Can you also add, it is a minor change in the value of > FATTR4_XATTR_SUPPORT Thanks, Marc. > > commit ac16ad42a514de218debc9b21e92cf9ca353ccc4 > Author: Marc Eshel > Date: Sun Jul 30 12:50:14 2017 -0700 > > update FATTR4_XATTR_SUPPORT > > update FATTR4_XATTR_SUPPORT to 82 based on latest draft-ietf-nfsv4- > xattrs-06.txt > Push to version 2.5 > > Change-Id: Id9afe2cedc9de080e5008a4a8bb502f47ebd0116 > Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel Yes, already tagged that one in my e-mail listing the patches from V2.6-dev-2 to backport. Frank > From: "Frank Filz" > To: , "'Matt Benjamin'" > Cc: 'nfs-ganesha-devel' > Date: 08/09/2017 09:05 AM > Subject:Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > > > > On 08/09/2017 11:29 AM, Frank Filz wrote: > > > Candidates not merged into 2.6 yet: > > > > > > Fix rgw_mount2 check when RGW not installed Daniel > > Gryniewicz > > > CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name Daniel > > > Gryniewicz > > > Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpc Daniel > > > Gryniewicz > > > > These could be useful to upstream Ceph for building. However, it's > > not > vital. > > For now, they have to have a separate branch with patches to do this. > > If it helps upstream Ceph for building, that seems like a good reason to take > them. > > Frank > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging > tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > > > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
Can you also add, it is a minor change in the value of FATTR4_XATTR_SUPPORT Thanks, Marc. commit ac16ad42a514de218debc9b21e92cf9ca353ccc4 Author: Marc Eshel Date: Sun Jul 30 12:50:14 2017 -0700 update FATTR4_XATTR_SUPPORT update FATTR4_XATTR_SUPPORT to 82 based on latest draft-ietf-nfsv4-xattrs-06.txt Push to version 2.5 Change-Id: Id9afe2cedc9de080e5008a4a8bb502f47ebd0116 Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel From: "Frank Filz" To: , "'Matt Benjamin'" Cc: 'nfs-ganesha-devel' Date: 08/09/2017 09:05 AM Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > On 08/09/2017 11:29 AM, Frank Filz wrote: > > Candidates not merged into 2.6 yet: > > > > Fix rgw_mount2 check when RGW not installed Daniel > Gryniewicz > > CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name Daniel > > Gryniewicz > > Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpc Daniel > > Gryniewicz > > These could be useful to upstream Ceph for building. However, it's not vital. > For now, they have to have a separate branch with patches to do this. If it helps upstream Ceph for building, that seems like a good reason to take them. Frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
> On 08/09/2017 11:29 AM, Frank Filz wrote: > > Candidates not merged into 2.6 yet: > > > > Fix rgw_mount2 check when RGW not installed Daniel > Gryniewicz > > CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name Daniel > > Gryniewicz > > Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpcDaniel > > Gryniewicz > > These could be useful to upstream Ceph for building. However, it's not vital. > For now, they have to have a separate branch with patches to do this. If it helps upstream Ceph for building, that seems like a good reason to take them. Frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
On 08/09/2017 11:29 AM, Frank Filz wrote: Candidates not merged into 2.6 yet: Fix rgw_mount2 check when RGW not installed Daniel Gryniewicz CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name Daniel Gryniewicz Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpcDaniel Gryniewicz These could be useful to upstream Ceph for building. However, it's not vital. For now, they have to have a separate branch with patches to do this. Daniel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
Candidates not merged into 2.6 yet: Fix rgw_mount2 check when RGW not installed Daniel Gryniewicz CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the correct tarball name Daniel Gryniewicz Build libntirpc package when not using system ntirpcDaniel Gryniewicz Are any of the above three relevant to 2.5? If so, yes. Ensure partition lock and qlane lock ordering Daniel Gryniewicz Yes Set op_ctx when calling mdcache_lru_clean() in the context of background thread. Pradeepthomas Yes Fixed mappings of Detached_Mult and Dir_Chunk to the right mdcache_parameter. Pradeepthomas Yes MDCACHE LRU: Increase log level from LogDebug to LogFullDebug Supriti Yes FSAL: Provision for performance stats. Sachin Punadikar Probably not unless IBM needs this one. Allow '.' and '..' as target path in symlink creation for NFSv4 Sachin Punadikar Yes [rpm] Fix rpm release number. Malahal Yes > -Original Message- > From: Matt Benjamin [mailto:mbenj...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 7:23 AM > To: Gryniewicz, Daniel > Cc: nfs-ganesha-devel > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > does this include the fix for readdir chunking config parsing issue? > I thought that affected 2.5.x > > Matt > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Gryniewicz > wrote: > > Here's my proposed backports for 2.5.2: > > > > commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 > > FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free > > > > commit 114c38ce9fcf20878ffce3b454e106089a34ab5d > > Decrement FD count in fsal_close even if obj_ops.close() fails > > > > commit 7f7c92363ba5c96e6fe5add81c81e65e90063cb2 > > MDCACHE - Fix rename/getattrs deadlock > > > > commit ef48ab5bc4e3f1a0fd6879433d774975622e8383 > > Dbus config: Allow only root users > > > > commit 2b88bcd16aaa653874079dc7401a49bb61421401 > > nfs_init_complete() is called too soon! > > > > commit 4aec4811f1c83578df8ecaacf4c8adda58cc3393 > > Fix deadlock in lru_reap_impl and simplify reapers > > > > commit d2b701662db9468c967ed6ecfd274625b1902a6c > > Add new Reaper_Work_Per_Lane option > > > > > > Daniel > > > > -- > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's > > most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > ___ > > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging > tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
I had posted this earlier as a response to the dev-2 announcement... Since we are talking about tagging V2.5.2 this week in addition to V2.6-dev-4, I thought I'd indicate which patches from dev-2 probably should be taken: There will be more from dev-4 (but nothing from dev-3) > 860368f Malahal Naineni Add dbus interface to recalculate fd limits Yes if IBM needs this > c8bc40b Daniel Gryniewicz CMake - Have 'make dist' generate the > correct tarball name No > 814e9cd Gui Hecheng FSAL_RGW: adopt new rgw_mount2 with bucket > specified No > 39119aa Soumya Koduri FSAL_GLUSTER: Use glfs_xreaddirplus_r for > readdir Yes? No? It's sort of a new feature, but may be critical for some use cases. I'd rather it go into stable than end up separately backported for downstream. > 3441818 Dominique Martinet GPFS: add sys/sysmacros.h include to > export.c Yes > d2b7016 Daniel Gryniewicz Add new Reaper_Work_Per_Lane option Yes (it's a new option, but I think this is critical for some use cases of Ganesha, let's get it into stable sooner than later) > 18baba1 Kinglong Mee export: add a parameter to indicating lock type > for foreach_gsh_export Yes > ac16ad4 Marc Eshel update FATTR4_XATTR_SUPPORT Yes (spec compliance) > f0a6a4e Frank S. Filz Fix CREATE_SESSION replay cache Yes (spec compliance) > 18ca372 Frank S. Filz Fix EID6h and EID7 pynfs 4.1 test cases Yes (spec compliance and also fixes a refcount leak) > 4aec481 Frank S. Filz Fix deadlock in lru_reap_impl and simplify > reapers Yes Frank --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Gryniewicz [mailto:d...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2017 7:49 AM > To: Matt Benjamin > Cc: nfs-ganesha-devel > Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2 > > That's not in 2.6 yet. As soon as it is, yes. > > Daniel > > On 08/09/2017 10:22 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote: > > does this include the fix for readdir chunking config parsing issue? > > I thought that affected 2.5.x > > > > Matt > > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Gryniewicz > wrote: > >> Here's my proposed backports for 2.5.2: > >> > >> commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 > >> FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free > >> > >> commit 114c38ce9fcf20878ffce3b454e106089a34ab5d > >> Decrement FD count in fsal_close even if obj_ops.close() fails > >> > >> commit 7f7c92363ba5c96e6fe5add81c81e65e90063cb2 > >> MDCACHE - Fix rename/getattrs deadlock > >> > >> commit ef48ab5bc4e3f1a0fd6879433d774975622e8383 > >> Dbus config: Allow only root users > >> > >> commit 2b88bcd16aaa653874079dc7401a49bb61421401 > >> nfs_init_complete() is called too soon! > >> > >> commit 4aec4811f1c83578df8ecaacf4c8adda58cc3393 > >> Fix deadlock in lru_reap_impl and simplify reapers > >> > >> commit d2b701662db9468c967ed6ecfd274625b1902a6c > >> Add new Reaper_Work_Per_Lane option > >> > >> > >> Daniel > >> > >> - > >> - Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's > >> most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > >> ___ > >> Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > >> Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel > > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging > tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
That's not in 2.6 yet. As soon as it is, yes. Daniel On 08/09/2017 10:22 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote: does this include the fix for readdir chunking config parsing issue? I thought that affected 2.5.x Matt On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: Here's my proposed backports for 2.5.2: commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free commit 114c38ce9fcf20878ffce3b454e106089a34ab5d Decrement FD count in fsal_close even if obj_ops.close() fails commit 7f7c92363ba5c96e6fe5add81c81e65e90063cb2 MDCACHE - Fix rename/getattrs deadlock commit ef48ab5bc4e3f1a0fd6879433d774975622e8383 Dbus config: Allow only root users commit 2b88bcd16aaa653874079dc7401a49bb61421401 nfs_init_complete() is called too soon! commit 4aec4811f1c83578df8ecaacf4c8adda58cc3393 Fix deadlock in lru_reap_impl and simplify reapers commit d2b701662db9468c967ed6ecfd274625b1902a6c Add new Reaper_Work_Per_Lane option Daniel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Proposed backports for 2.5.2
does this include the fix for readdir chunking config parsing issue? I thought that affected 2.5.x Matt On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > Here's my proposed backports for 2.5.2: > > commit 7f2d461277521301a417ca368d3c7656edbfc903 > FSAL_GLUSTER: Reset caller_garray to NULL upon free > > commit 114c38ce9fcf20878ffce3b454e106089a34ab5d > Decrement FD count in fsal_close even if obj_ops.close() fails > > commit 7f7c92363ba5c96e6fe5add81c81e65e90063cb2 > MDCACHE - Fix rename/getattrs deadlock > > commit ef48ab5bc4e3f1a0fd6879433d774975622e8383 > Dbus config: Allow only root users > > commit 2b88bcd16aaa653874079dc7401a49bb61421401 > nfs_init_complete() is called too soon! > > commit 4aec4811f1c83578df8ecaacf4c8adda58cc3393 > Fix deadlock in lru_reap_impl and simplify reapers > > commit d2b701662db9468c967ed6ecfd274625b1902a6c > Add new Reaper_Work_Per_Lane option > > > Daniel > > -- > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel
