I'm struggling with the classical audit log problem. I'm using an
NHibernate Interceptor to get called when anything is stored. We have
a three tier architecture and the changes on the entities mostly occur
outside of a session. Now I need to get the original values from the
database to compare
. Thanks again.
On 11 Nov., 15:21, Fabio Maulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/11 Stefan Steinegger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ok, I'll try Merge and hope that it does not have bigger implications.
Thanks a lot guys. I'll come back if I still can't get it running.
Don't forget to read Merge API doc
, Ayende Rahien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are you trying to get the values from the DB?NH will give you the old
values, and you can ensure that it will behave well with optimistic
concurrency
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Stefan Steinegger [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I'm struggling
PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/11 Stefan Steinegger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, I remember, I already used Merge for some special purpose. This
could be a major issue, because we would have to use Merge as the
default storing method through the whole system, by avoiding the
business logic to know too
I also wonder what you mean, Fabio.
By the way, we have a bit more complex case where a part of the
software needs to access setters that are not available for others
(e.g. setting the id / version to 0 after deep copying to create a new
instance). We have another interface for this. This is a
Fabio,
Don't you think it is inconsistent that a Session closes a transaction
it didn't start?
Using ADO (or whatever) I open a connection and begin the transaction
and pass it to CreateSession. When I dispose the Session, my
transaction is gone.
The session should distinguish if it is its own
()
If you would use the session factory, you would have to write
sessionfactory.OpenStatelessSession(oldsession.Connection)
what's really bad and shouldn't be recommended.
On 27 Nov., 12:25, Fabio Maulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/27 Stefan Steinegger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What about
or complications.
What about a practical syntax like ISession.Stateless.CreateCriteria
(...)?
On 27 Nov., 10:48, Fabio Maulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/nhibernate-development/browse_thread/t...
We have some pending work about transactions.
2008/11/27 Stefan Steinegger
have to change the
// actual object structure to be able to store it!
parentEntity.Child = dal.Merge(parentEntity.Child)
dal.SaveOrUpdate(parentEntity)
dal.Commit();
}
On 27 Nov., 15:16, Fabio Maulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok understand it need an example.
2008/11/27 Stefan Steinegger
I'm also interested in this topic.
We are using a single entity domain model in our project that is
mapped by NH, serves as DTO's and is also bound to the UI. It is nice
to have only one model, you don't have to add data on many places (eg.
mapping file, entity, DTO, mapper) which makes
For instance, we had issues with DateTime. SqlServer is limited in
range and does not store milliseconds, while Sqlite just worked fine.
On 2 Dez., 16:27, Michiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I recently started to write integration tests for my repositories,
which are implemented using
I agree with Markus. NH should always persist what you have in memory.
If you have multiple references in memory and want to remove them all
at once, you need to do this in the business logic. Then you can
expect from NH to do the same in the database.
The business logic should always look after
I don't understand the problem. Where does NHibernate generate a date
format? You should have a DateTime in the entity and a date in the
database. Dates in queries should be passed as parameters, not as
strings. Doesn't this work?
On 19 Jan., 16:38, chris.j.smith...@googlemail.com
I don't use NH because it's free. I use it because it is the best way
I know to access a database from a .NET application. Really, none of
the products I looked at had its features or its non-intrusive nature.
IMHO, many other products are only used because many oo developers
don't know much
I don't know what exactly you are doing. But it could be that NH
already flushed a part of the changes to the database. If you look
into the database with some DB tool, you can't see this changes,
because they are not committed yet.
I think, Refresh does not put the object into the cache. You
over his project.
Rant off^^
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Stefan Steinegger
stefan@bluewin.chwrote:
I don't use NH because it's free. I use it because it is the best way
I know to access a database from a .NET application. Really, none of
the products I looked at had its
I just wrote unit tests about Refresh. I found the following:
- if the object is not (yet) in the session, it works fine.
- if changes are already flushed, the changes are not undone.
I didn't test with evict. But I think you have a flushing problem. So
don't use Refresh if you already touched
IMO, it's always a matter of the size and complexity of the
application. If you have a small desktop app, why not using NH in the
UI? There aren't almost any layers.
We have a client server application. Even the business logic does not
reference to NH. It doesn't even reference the Data
I have the problem that I would like to turn off lazy loading at all
for certain queries. Most of our data is requested by the client
(WCF), and needs to be complete.
I know a can turn of lazy loading in the query. But to do this, I have
to declare all the references an entity has. Many objects
I'm also interested in this. IDENTITY works for SqlServer, Oracle
would need a sequence that is used in the insert statement. Is there
any database independent solution? To make it a little more
complicated, we are creating the database schema only from the mapping
files (until now...).
On 12
consecutively numbered entities (AFAIK invoices need that in some
countries to fight tax evasion), I fall back to a trigger that inserts
the number into a separate property. That would however require you to
have additional schema definition scripts.
-Markus
2009/2/17 Stefan Steinegger stefan
Note that Merge has a return value. The returned value is the instance
in the session. This is because there could be already an instance in
the session, which will be initialized with the values from your
object (what actually is the merging).
var attachedObject = session.Merge(detachedObject);
...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/4 Stefan Steinegger stefan@bluewin.ch
var attachedObject = session.Merge(detachedObject);
Assert.IsTrue(session.Contains(attachedObject));
Don't use attachedObject anymore, it is not in the session an must not
be referenced by any attached instance.
I
Application.
Thanks for feedback
antoschka
On 4 Mrz., 21:41, Stefan Steinegger stefan@bluewin.ch wrote:
As I know, the referenced entities in the bag are only evicted if they
are mapped with cascade=all. That's the reason why I stopped using it.
If I where you, I wouldn't use evict
You should carefully decide if you want to use lazy loading (and these
proxies) by default. You could get issues with inheritance (the proxy
of a subclass is not derived from the proxy of the base class) or
serialization (eg. WCF). If you just want the old behaviour, you can
turn off lazy loading
...@gmail.com wrote:
NH2.1.0Alpha2 (actual trunk)
2009/3/18 Stefan Steinegger stefan@bluewin.ch
Hi all. I'm trying to map a collection (bag) into a composite-element.
Isn't this possible?
class name=A ...
bag name=B table=A_B
key .../
composite-element
property .../
bag
Thanks a lot for the ongoing incredible work! Again a stunning amount
of new features and enhancements since 2.0. I'm looking forward to the
final 2.1 release :-)
On 19 Mrz., 05:19, Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if you have realized that NH2.1.0Alpha1 was released...
If
Why can't you cast it because of the proxy? If the proxy would
actually be derived from ProfileA, you should be able to cast it to
ProfileA. Are you sure that you don't actually have a proxy of
Profile? Check your mapping, did you define the subclasses and
discriminators correctly? What is the
for it.
Thanks for the hint of the waiting time. Good point.
On 19 Mrz., 13:28, Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/3/19 Stefan Steinegger stefan@bluewin.ch
Thanks a lot for the ongoing incredible work! Again a stunning amount
of new features and enhancements since 2.0. I'm looking
that interalize dyn proxy
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Stefan Steinegger
stefan@bluewin.chwrote:
Fabio, I already downloaded the alpha version and tried it. There are
some interface changes I have to fix, and DynamicProxy2 conflicts with
the version for RhinoMocks. Nothing really
I have to admit that I didn't read the whole thread.
When using reflection, a explicit implementation of a property has the
name InterfaceNamespace.Interface.PropertyName. So you should try
this in the mapping file.
About the design: I also tried explicit interface implementations and
removed
Hi all.
I agree with Oskar, Roger and Jay. Timespan is conceptually a duration
(time interval), not a time. We use it to express age like 1h, 24h,
7days, 1month etc. Using it as a time is a very special case that
should be explicit. After all because it reduces the value range
massively. You
We are using Spring, DynamicProxy and Rhino Mocks (using Dynamic
Proxy). I have to admit that I still don't have any clue which proxy
system to choose. There are some problems with DP I could solve by
compiling Rhino. Switching to LinFu might be even easier. But what are
the actual differences of
We are trying to lock an instance in the database to make sure that is
does not change. But only the inherited class is locked, so we are not
locking the base class.
pseudo code:
class Base { string A { get; set; }}
class Inherited { string B { get; set; }}
Transaction 1:
Inherited myEntity =
nobody had the same problem?
On 9 Apr., 09:49, Stefan Steinegger stefan@bluewin.ch wrote:
We are trying to lock an instance in the database to make sure that is
does not change. But only the inherited class is locked, so we are not
locking the base class.
pseudo code:
class Base
Hello. I'm trying to get version 2.1 working on our codebase. I
couldn't get my AuditTrail implementation working, because there are
changes on NH's collections.
I get the collection's old-value like in this implementation from
jr76:
of the collection
/// /summary
ICollection GetSnapshot(ICollectionPersister persister);
it depend on what you are doing with it
2009/5/11 Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com
IPersistentCollection.StoredSnapshot
2009/5/11 Stefan Steinegger stefan@bluewin.ch
Hello. I'm trying to get
] = collection.CollectionSnapshot.Snapshot;
As you can see, you are casting an element of state's array to
a IPersistentCollection.
Obviously using collection's listeners is more easy than use IIterceptor
(discontinued interface).
2009/5/11 Stefan Steinegger stefan@bluewin.ch
Using NH 2.0, I have a custom type. It is composed of four properties,
so I implemented ICompositeUserType. I want to specify length and
precision for the string and decimal properties within the user type,
to avoid specifying it with every usage in the mapping files.
But there is only a
there is, it needs to be
structured, by NH version and topic, and needs TOC's and good
navigation. If it is not structured it ends up being only a box for
puzzle pieces.
On 11 Mai, 21:14, Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/11 Stefan Steinegger stefan@bluewin.ch
I know
In a thread with Fabio Maulo (http://groups.google.com.ar/group/
nhusers/browse_thread/thread/256e8a8a9958f939/
a41a81c21a26fb03#a41a81c21a26fb03) we went off on a tangent and came
to the documentation problem. Here is a summary:
* many things are hardly documented
* the documentation is there
of
the hibernate documentation-reference apply to NH and which do not, or
applies but with a different behavior implementation.
A structure that both helps people to contribute to documentation and
readers to find content easily.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Stefan Steinegger
stefan
There is a ICompositeUserType, where you can define several columns.
You could also make it parameterized, to define in the mapping which
columns exist. It depends on what problem you have actually to solve.
On 18 Mai, 09:42, martin martin.kirs...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the way
.
- More detailed explanation about session management in the Architecture.
Maybe using a small example of the current best practice with contextual
sessions.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Stefan Steinegger
stefan@bluewin.chwrote:
Thanks, Sidar for your response
This is not a trivial question at all. I still don't know many
differences between hql and criteria features, and hope you get some
good answers here :-)
AFAIK, you don't have these pseudo-properties or functions like
elements and class, and you don't have the index operator [] on lists.
I do
Forgot to mention: you can not make cartesian products with criteria.
So you can't select columns from different tables if they don't have a
mapped reference. This could be important for reports or when using
legacy databases.
On 19 Mai, 13:30, Stefan Steinegger stefan@bluewin.ch wrote
)
.SetFetchMode(BCollection, FetchMode.Join)
.SetFetchMode(CCollection, FetchMode.Join)
.SetFetchMode(DCollection, FetchMode.Join)
.ListFoo();
-Original Message-
From: nhusers@googlegroups.com [mailto:nhus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Stefan Steinegger
Sent: den 19 maj
What else should it be?
On 26 Mai, 11:25, srinivas srinivas14...@gmail.com wrote:
Is key column=/ tag always a Foreign Key in the Collection
table?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
nhusers group.
Just bookmarked this for the documentation :-)
On 11 Jun., 20:54, Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/11 Tuna Toksoz tehl...@gmail.com
BitwiseOr BitwiseAnd and maybe DateDiff?
DateAdd or similar
But what is really needed is the translation in each dialect.
--
Fabio Maulo
You should actually avoid this.
If have to cope with a legacy database, use property-ref:
class Class1
{
//...
public Guid BusinessId { get; set; }
}
class Class2
{
//...
public MyClass1 { get; set; }
}
class name=Class2 table=TABLE2
!-- ... --
many-to-one
name=MyClass1
I have a user type which specifies a decimal with precision and scale
like this:
public IType[] PropertyTypes
{
get
{
return new []
{
TypeFactory.GetDecimalType(36, 18),
TypeFactory.GetStringType(100)
wrote:
There were some issues with decimal db
typehttp://nhjira.koah.net/browse/NH-1594
Are you using latest nh bits?
-Original Message-
From: nhusers@googlegroups.com [mailto:nhus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
Stefan Steinegger
Sent: den 1 juli 2009 13:54
To: nhusers
Is there a reason why you don't use a many-to-many relation? I assume
there are additional properties in the assignment class?
You should probably use the key-many-to-one element instead of the
key-property element, to tell NH that this id is actually many-to-
one relation. i never used this,
Note that you only get the old values if they have ever loaded into
the session. This is important when working with detached instances. I
had a hard time to figure this out and write the application that it
works.
- Use Get or any query to get the instance into the session and
change
Indeed. Fabios answer might be emotional (I found it funny by the
way). But Sams post is just ridiculous. Working since one and a half
week with NH and demanding binaries including a certain feature
pronto?? Fabio just points out what scale this project has, how many
people already depend on in
You seem to mix assembly names and namespaces:
This few lines:
hibernate-mapping
xmlns=urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2
namespace=toolShopCl
assembly=toolShopNH
class name=Person, toolShopCl
After the comma, you define the assembly name. You seem to have a
namespace there.
It should be
)
transaction.Rollback();
ExceptionShow(ex);
}
finally
{
if (session != null)
session.Close();
}
On Jul 20, 11:15 am, Stefan Steinegger stefan.steineg...@bluewin.ch
wrote
I don't know how your application looks like, and if the changes are
made outside the session (detached). But - what you are doing here
smells a bit. Try to treat it this way:
- consider to map the class using optimistic-lock=dirty, so you only
get an exception when the same properties changed.
If NH does unnecessary updates, it is mostly due to implicit changes
within the entity. The properties must always return the exact value
that has been set by NH, if it is a collection, the entity must return
the same instance as set by NH, unless NH treats it as a change and
updates the
What exactly is the question? If you have a 1:M relation between two
tables, you can map it differently.
Lets say Table A 1=m Table B, mapped to classes A and B.
- Map it as a collection (list / bag / set / map etc.) of class A
- Map it as a reference (many-to-one) in class B
- Map it as both,
You can use the join element to map properties which are in another
table.
You could have more or less classes as tables. Usually, you have more
classes then tables. This is because of performance optimization.
Classes could be as small as needed to make them reusable, and you
will have classes
Many but in table B I dont need objects of class A then would I still
have to define Many to One there.
I had tried doing that and it doesn't create any problems but just to
make sure if it is mandatory.
On Aug 7, 11:30 am, Stefan Steinegger stefan.steineg...@bluewin.ch
wrote:
What
Without deep knowledge about how the sessions get garbage collection,
I would not let the garbage collector clean up your session. I would
let the caller make clear when he finished its stuff.
For instance, make the repository disposable. The clean up all the
sessions and transactions in the
You need to tell us more details about WHAT you are actually doing.
Post the HQL and probably some details about the calculations.
There is no general solution for 100K records. There is no If you
have 100K records, just use feature X. There is some trade-off. It
depends on the situation which
Currently we are doing long running tests on our system. After a
couple or hours, the system suddenly hangs on a call to the NH
session. I don't know if this is a NH problem, application problem or
SQL server problem.
Code looks like this:
logger.Debug(A);
session.Flush()
logger.Debug(B)
query
There is still not enough information to give you a meaningful advise.
What kind of structure are you querying? Have you observed the sql
generated by NH to say if there are many queries to load referenced
objects?
What amount of data do you need to make your calculation? Is it
possible to load
I don't think that this has any influence. But you can try this:
from Product p join p.Category
where p = :product ...
And see what it does.
On 7 Aug., 14:00, Marvin Massih marvin.mas...@googlemail.com wrote:
Does nobody have an idea how to fix this? :(
I agree with Fabio. The table needs to be selected anyway. It does not
make sense to only read half the columns from the table, and read the
rest in another query. Usually, the most expensive are db roundtrips
and joins.
I think hival's mapping is what you need.
You need to know what it means
Nelson, one of NH's benefits is what is called persistence
ignorance. It means that the business logic does not need to know
about persistence. It just changes the state of the entities (which
are attached to the session), and these changes get persisted
automatically by NH. The business logic
much for taking some time to answer, Stefan.
On Aug 13, 4:47 pm, Stefan Steinegger stefan.steineg...@bluewin.ch
wrote:
Nelson, one of NH's benefits is what is called persistence
ignorance. It means that the business logic does not need to know
about persistence. It just changes the state
We found the problem, I posted a patch:
http://nhjira.koah.net/browse/NH-1931
On 7 Aug., 10:15, Stefan Steinegger stefan.steineg...@bluewin.ch
wrote:
Currently we are doing long running tests on our system. After a
couple or hours, the system suddenly hangs on a call to the NH
session. I
I wouldn't build dtos after the commit, because you can't use lazy
loading then.
Flush should actually synchronize all the changes. So I'm also
wondering ...
On 13 Aug., 22:42, Luke Bakken luke.bak...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
Just wanted to check that this is expected behavior in
Steinegger
stefan.steineg...@bluewin.ch wrote:
We found the problem, I posted a patch:
http://nhjira.koah.net/browse/NH-1931
On 7 Aug., 10:15, Stefan Steinegger stefan.steineg...@bluewin.ch
wrote:
Currently we are doing long running tests on our system. After a
couple or hours
, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Stefan Steinegger
stefan.steineg...@bluewin.ch wrote:
I explain the problem we encountered in the issue. The patch is
intended to fix it :-)
I don't know how to write a sensible test for this. Of course I can
create two NativeSQLQuerySpecification instances
Try
Product product = session.LoadProduct(1);
session.Delete(product);
This should actually only create a proxy for the Product 8assuming you
are using lazy loading). Then you can remove it.
then you can use on-delete in the mapping to let the database clean up
referenced records:
in Property should be 9 but 0.
// PS: I cannot find the discription of on-delete attribute in the
doc:http://nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html.
Blog:http://www.cnblogs.com/JeffreyZhao/
Twitter:http://twitter.com/jeffz_cn
--
From: Stefan Steinegger
You should create new post to ask a new question.
There is not actually a NH way, but a transactional way is to either
commit the changes or rollback the whole thing. This is usually done
by exception handling.
Just an example in pseudo code:
try
{
cat = Load(id);
cat.Name = some name;
I wouldn't evict anything. Just my opinion.
There is no persistence ignorance if you can tell the persistence
layer to undo some changes in memory. If you implement as if there is
no persistency, you don't expect to be able to undo a few changes you
made in memory. There aren't two layers of
L2S.
Blog:http://www.cnblogs.com/JeffreyZhao/
Twitter:http://twitter.com/jeffz_cn
--
From: Stefan Steinegger stefan.steineg...@bluewin.ch
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2009 7:55 PM
To: nhusers nhusers@googlegroups.com
Subject: [nhusers] Re: How can
Why not simply:
IListstring result = session
.CreateQuery(select m.Text from Message where m.Read = false
and ...)
.Liststring();
and
session.Update(Message set m.Read = false where ...);
You could also have a list of ids to know which messages need to be
set to read.
On 14 Aug., 14:39,
really worked with big tables ?
On Aug 14, 5:39 pm, ReverseBlade empe...@gmail.com wrote:
If you have 50 million of records then this solution is not feasible
imho,
that's why I am trying to split it.
On Aug 14, 4:34 pm, Stefan Steinegger stefan.steineg...@bluewin.ch
wrote:
Why
Isn't it easier to just load the entity model and copy the needed data
to the DTO? Using lazy loading and optimized queries it should
actually only load entities that are needed. I mean, development time
is also not for free...
On 16 Aug., 17:26, Vadimmer vadimkanto...@gmail.com wrote:
The
Quote: I thought that NH would see [...]. But unfortunately NH
didn't.
What actually did NH do? Has the foreign key been put into the wrong
table? In which?
On 17 Aug., 10:27, hival hi...@ukr.net wrote:
Yes, exactly the same problem. The fact that I'm not the only who
encountered this
Most probably, the pre-update is called during the flush. So NH goes
through all the entities in the session and calls the trigger if they
are dirty. If you change another entity there, it could have already
evaluated. NH can't know that it has to be evaluated again, until you
call Flush.
On 17
If you store references to unread messages, you don't need to read
flag anymore.
I know this is a special solution, it only works because you could
assume that most of the messages have been read.
I wouldn't use both solutions at the same time. This data partitioning
stuff might also work well,
You could probably make the friends table an own entity. Then you can
load it (not loading the users because of lazy loading) and delete it.
The lists in the users would be inverse, so you don't have to update
them (if the are NOT in the session, unless your session will be out
of synch).
By
I'm also still searching for a nice solution for this. At the moment,
I stick with this:
The business logic is generally responsible for data consistency. It
needs to check uniqueness as well as others. Consider that there are
many validations that can not be covered by the database anyway,
I suggest to continue this topic in the ORIGINAL thread.
So please don't answer here, it would just get complicated.
On 19 Aug., 21:55, mathmax maximeandrighe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I still have no answer in this thread.
Where does this magneto131 come from? I is certainly not invented by
NH ...
On 12 Aug., 14:13, mathmax maximeandrighe...@gmail.com wrote:
shipping_method as {ship.Id}inverted
I don't understand. What do you mean by inverted ? It's like the
example: First the field to the database, then the
., 21:30, mathmax maximeandrighe...@gmail.com wrote:
magneto131 is the name of the mysql database (set in the config file).
But Nhibernate shouldn't look at a table called Shipping in this
database since the entity should be loaded via the sql query.
On 20 août, 08:58, Stefan Steinegger
I try to explain it again.
Don't rely on the fact that there is a database. Validation should not
occur before changes are persisted, but when they are done (in memory,
by the business logic).
Making changes in memory but not storing them is NOT the solution. How
would to reliably validate
@Fabio, sorry, but sometimes I just don't have a clue what you are
talking about :-)
We are loading entities using select new or
AliasToBeanResultTransformer to get instances of entities from a
normal session without performance problems.
You can create a child session using session.GetSession.
How does the line of code exactly look like, where the null reference
exception occurs? And where is this line of code?
On 24 Aug., 16:03, Seth Goldstein seth.d.goldst...@gmail.com wrote:
The code is essentially:
class ParentClass
{
private int _myProperty;
ParentClass()
{
}
I'm not sure if you can turn of writing to the filed. Any way, you
shouldn't look for property accessors, because these are fields.
On 3 Sep., 15:17, bstack bs.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you map directly to readonly properties in NHibernate or is it
impossible? e.g.
public class Entity
You can just write it the old school way, by making a cartesian
product and filter it in the where clause:
from
Parent p,
Child c
where
p.Iid = c.FkIid
On 7 Sep., 08:18, merrycoder merryco...@googlemail.com wrote:
Thanks for the answer, Fabio. Unfortunately this doesn't solve my
issue.
There has already been a huge discussion about this here:
http://groups.google.com.ar/group/nhusers/browse_thread/thread/11e5ff4c27006c4b/e4326591c21c41fa
It does actually not make much sense to update only a part of your
entities in memory. You should not change anything in memory you don't
is taste ;)NH gives to the user the ability to apply his
taste, in some case... not in all cases... but where a solution is available
the user can simply apply it (obviously without ask us to apply his taste as
default behaviour).
2009/9/7 Stefan Steinegger stefan.steineg...@bluewin.ch
Fabio: How do you define a relation in the mapping but not in the
domain? By just not giving a property name?
Like this?
many-to-one class=Target column=FK /
What can you do with it? Is is usable for criteria? I always have the
problem that criteria can not make cartesian products for joins on
We are also running unit tests using SqlLite in memory. We create the
database before every test (just open the connection and use Schema
Export) and it is very fast.
We can switch to sql server by changing the build configuration. Then
it has a database for each test assembly, which is created
of
this.
Thanks for the replies!
-Original Message-
From: nhusers@googlegroups.com [mailto:nhus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Stefan Steinegger
Sent: dinsdag 8 september 2009 0:03
To: nhusers
Subject: [nhusers] Re: Run unit tests in parallel without db deadlocks?
We are also running
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
