[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 4d5452: lib: introduce imap0, imap1 (#25543)

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 4d545297d85c8f32f7ab496d0759f40d881bd61d https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/4d545297d85c8f32f7ab496d0759f40d881bd61d Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-07-04 (Tue, 04 Ju

Re: [Nix-dev] nix-daemon and private git repos

Yes, the source is part of the build input and is uploaded to the worker to run the build. On Tue, 4 Jul 2017, 17:46 Tomas Hlavaty, wrote: > On Tue 04 Jul 2017 at 13:49, "Alexander V. Nikolaev" > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 03:19:31PM

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 51c481: terraform: 0.9.10 -> 0.9.11

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 51c481bdcc30e581dc9f3221530acd8e299b89c8 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/51c481bdcc30e581dc9f3221530acd8e299b89c8 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-07-04 (Tue, 04 Ju

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 6f86a1: Terraform 0.9.10 (#27003)

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 6f86a1bd09116a6ad5a07ba040f6d9ddc5caa21e https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/6f86a1bd09116a6ad5a07ba040f6d9ddc5caa21e Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-07-01 (Sat, 01 Ju

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs]

Branch: refs/heads/ipfs-0.4.10 Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs ___ nix-commits mailing list nix-comm...@lists.science.uu.nl https://mailman.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-commits

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 3dd29b: ipfs: 0.4.9 -> 0.4.10 (#27001)

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 3dd29b2453d1065ae468c2637a24d415c6cd0695 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/3dd29b2453d1065ae468c2637a24d415c6cd0695 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-07-01 (Sat, 01 Ju

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 8558d1: ipfs: 0.4.9 -> 0.4.10

Branch: refs/heads/ipfs-0.4.10 Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 8558d1865554187b27f22ee74c0a5be9fc9aa569 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/8558d1865554187b27f22ee74c0a5be9fc9aa569 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-07-01 (Sat, 01 Ju

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] a6e71f: ipfs: 0.4.9 -> 0.4.10

Branch: refs/heads/ipfs-0.4.10 Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: a6e71fc05386f587279a7cfbbf2362b92e6fd7b0 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/a6e71fc05386f587279a7cfbbf2362b92e6fd7b0 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-07-01 (Sat, 01 Ju

Re: [Nix-dev] Announcing Chill Code - built with Nix

Hi Jasper, congrats on the launch! I think that it's a neat idea. For other people trying, the nix code is tucked away under each software card, more -> Download Nix definition. At this stage it doesn't seem editable so I'm not sure what the users will do with it. @Jasper: in

[Nix-dev] NixCon 2017 Call for Paper

I noticed this hasn't been sent to the list yet. From https://schedule.nixcon2017.org/en/nixcon2017/cfp/session/new : - The second NixCon will take place in *Munich, Germany, October 28-31 2017*. We are looking forward to your submissions for workshops (3 or 6 hours) and talks (15, 30, 45

Re: [Nix-dev] Auto-generated expressions for applications

On Wed, 31 May 2017, 17:23 Benno Fünfstück, wrote: > Profpatsch schrieb am Mi., 31. Mai 2017 um 16:01 Uhr: > >> On 17-05-31 08:25am, Benno Fünfstück wrote: >> > A package set >> > is a consistent set of packages of a given language. >> >> exactly

Re: [Nix-dev] Background images of desktop managers

Hi Maximilian, Welcome to the list :) Did you try setting `services.xserver.desktopManager.default = "none"`? I suspect that might do what you wanted. The "none" desktop manager doesn't do anything but should still apply the wallpaper regardless of the windowManager that you chose. On Sun, 28

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 4f6ab2: gitlab-runner: 9.1.0 -> 9.2.0

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 4f6ab299a0d433e041bde292ddd2996489fb3d21 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/4f6ab299a0d433e041bde292ddd2996489fb3d21 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-05-24 (Wed, 24 Ma

Re: [Nix-dev] why has each revision / generation not a own configuration.nix

How do you find back which git revision was used to produce a given NixOS profile? Maybe nixos-rebuild should be extended to include that in the revision name, and if the git repo is dirty. On Sat, 13 May 2017, 14:34 Profpatsch, wrote: > On 17-05-13 12:25pm, Layus wrote: >

Re: [Nix-dev] nvidia proprietary / i7 notebook - does not start

Writing from the phone so I don't have all the references at hand. There are currently two issues with NixOS that might affect you: * Nvidia Not creating the device driver properly * GDM tty allocation issue, this leads in GDM repeatedly crashing and making the console unusable because of the

Re: [Nix-dev] github triggered builds

Travis CI also has support for nix builds and might be easier to setup. On Mon, 8 May 2017, 18:17 Tomasz Czyż, wrote: > https://nixos.org/hydra/ > > and > > https://github.com/hercules-ci/hercules ( looks like still in heavy > development but maybe usable :)) > >

Re: [Nix-dev] Need any mirror in Asia?

d thread: https://mailman.science.uu. > > nl/pipermail/nix-dev/2016-October/022029.html > > > > > > On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Karibu <kar...@freedif.org> wrote: > > > Hi Zimbatm, > > > > > > This would be the first time for me. >

Re: [Nix-dev] Need any mirror in Asia?

@Karibu: is it possible to setup the mirror as a secondary layer cache instead? On Thu, 4 May 2017 at 14:18 Volth wrote: > Actually, there are regions with bad connectity to Amazon's Cloudfront. > For example Russia, and, yes, Vietnam. > > There are few obstacles: > 1. the

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS and nix 1.12

At some point but there is no timeline yet. We don't even have a list of regressions to fix before release yet. On Thu, 13 Apr 2017, 15:12 Volth, wrote: > Hi > > Is nix-1.12 going to replace traditional nix command line utilities on > NixOS ? > If yes, when it is going to

Re: [Nix-dev] Announcing Hail — A service for pull-based continuous deployment from Hydra

Hi Shea, It's cool that you're reusing the activation script interface for non-nixos targets. What are the advantages for having hail run the cron task instead of using the system cron? Is it to make it more cross-OS compatible? Cheers, z On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, 19:16 Shea Levy,

Re: [Nix-dev] [Help] Accidentally removed configuration.nix

This issue is likely to trip most newcomers. Maybe nixos-install should create a git repo in /etc/nixos by default. And then "nixos build" automatically commit on invocation. On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, 04:41 Ryan Trinkle, wrote: > Jeaye, > > I totally agree! One really

Re: [Nix-dev] Banning people from the mailinglist?

I'm proud of how mature the nix community is, it takes some effort to not respond to hate with more hate. Share the love :D On Tue, 4 Apr 2017, 17:05 Alexey Shmalko, wrote: > I recommend reading You Are What You Write[1] and Difficult People[2] > chapters of Producing Open

Re: [Nix-dev] Overriding python with python3 in vim_configurable.customize

( > https://github.com/nicknovitski/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/misc/vim-plugins/vim-utils.nix#L291-L295). > Is there another way to override `python` with `python3` ( > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/8125#issuecomment-169471686)? > > Thanks, > > Ben > > On Apr 4

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] bc45ee: ruby: 2.4.0 -> 2.4.1

Log Message: --- ruby: 2.0.0-p647 -> 2.0.0-p648 Commit: 7fe25124bc3bb18c690154a491171d8b527d9440 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/7fe25124bc3bb18c690154a491171d8b527d9440 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-04-04 (Tue, 04 Apr 2017

Re: [Nix-dev] Overriding python with python3 in vim_configurable.customize

The "with" keyword binds the designated attrset pairs into scope. It doesn't override other called function variables though. Do you know if the customise function accepts a python argument as an input? On Tue, 4 Apr 2017, 06:04 Ben Zhang, wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 1bf690: iosevka: 1.11.4 -> 1.12.1 (#24527)

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 1bf690c1bb7bfc167d6ad78102a625320691e1ac https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/1bf690c1bb7bfc167d6ad78102a625320691e1ac Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-04-03 (Mon, 03 Ap

[Nix-dev] [RFC 004] Add Replace Unicode Quotes draft

Hi everyone, RFC 004 is now ready for wider reviews if you care to take a look: https://github.com/NixOS/rfcs/pull/4 Cheers, z PS: notice the NixOS/ prefix to the repo :) ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] f77de6: arcanist: 20160825 -> 20170323

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: f77de6d3dccd21b3a79bc96b4e809ea8c651baa4 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/f77de6d3dccd21b3a79bc96b4e809ea8c651baa4 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-03-25 (Sat, 25 Ma

Re: [Nix-dev] Should we drop 9P?

What matters are that the tests are valid, reproducible and not too slow. If you want to replace the filesystem and it improves any of these qualities I don't see any problems :) On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, 23:37 Ertugrul Söylemez, wrote: > > 9P is used by NixOS to share host's nix

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] b052a3: lib/trivial: expand function docs

sts.nix Log Message: --- lib/tests: add more tests for fold functions Also the invocation of tests is documented. Commit: 3bbab1757510de86d8062684f8c92d231265b934 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/3bbab1757510de86d8062684f8c92d231265b934 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimba

Re: [Nix-dev] How do you work on big packages?

Another option is to add a powerful remote builder on the local network. It doesn't beat incremental rebuilds but helps with having the laptop taking off and trying to burn my legs. Old desktop machines from ebay are not too expensive and still beat the laptop capacity. On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 at

Re: [Nix-dev] RFC for RFCs

. Cheers, z On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 at 17:44 Rok Garbas <r...@garbas.si> wrote: > I haven't read the latest changes in the RFC, but I welcome any more > formal process for major changes. > > Thank you @zimbatm for pursuing this. > > > > On 09 March 2017 at 13:09 Toma

Re: [Nix-dev] Google Summer of Code 2017

Added to calendar for next year :) On Wed, 15 Mar 2017, 22:03 Vladimír Čunát, wrote: > On 03/15/2017 04:33 PM, Oliver Charles wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:47 PM Domen Kožar > > wrote: > > That being said, I know people will be

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] b63aab: slack: 2.5.1 -> 2.5.2

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: b63aab243349792b3ae7ff31d93594cf355cc583 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/b63aab243349792b3ae7ff31d93594cf355cc583 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-03-14 (Tue, 14 Ma

Re: [Nix-dev] Move NodeJS to separate overlay repository?

) wants the security updates. As another data point, I created https://github.com/zimbatm/nix-rubygems which is a sort of nixpkgs overlay for all the ruby gems, created before the overlay feature. It contains the sha256 of all the rubygems until I last updated it (24 Nov 2016). When checking out

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 187372: luaPackages.mpack: enable darwin platform

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 1873721fcdcdd3a45294e873cef053878c10c20d https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/1873721fcdcdd3a45294e873cef053878c10c20d Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-03-10 (Fri, 10 Ma

Re: [Nix-dev] RFC for RFCs

The RFC for RFCs is ready for a final round of review. Unless there are major objections I would like to move forward with it, with the idea that we can always improve the process with further RFCs. https://github.com/zimbatm/rfcs/pull/1 On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 at 20:17 Maarten Hoogendoorn <m

Re: [Nix-dev] Contributions

Hi Judson, I believe it's also true for the NixOS foundation. There is a legal entity with money in the bank but it's not clear how to get it out. It would be nice to have clear rules and reporting so that donors know how their money is spent. As a community member it would also be nice to know

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] e50203: yarn: 0.21.3 -> 0.22.0

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: e50203bfde29065fd7d1f047d9e3797f5c302b76 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/e50203bfde29065fd7d1f047d9e3797f5c302b76 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-03-07 (Tue, 07 Ma

Re: [Nix-dev] 'nixos-stable' channel?

At the moment we don't provide a strong guarantee that release upgrades will be 100% backward-compatible. Having a "stable" channel that jumps between releases would be misleading I think. On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, 15:07 Linus Heckemann, wrote: > On 06/03/17 15:03, Domen Kožar

[Nix-dev] NixOS London Hackday #2

Hi all, I think I forgot to post this. Next Sunday (11th) we're hosting our second Hackday in London. Everyone is welcome to join. Thomas and I will be available if you want help for packaging your own stuff or just help you out in general. https://www.meetup.com/NixOS-London/events/237738532/

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 9c1399: packer: 0.12.1 -> 0.12.2

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 9c1399e476f98a68726bcd1792426300d388592c https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/9c1399e476f98a68726bcd1792426300d388592c Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-02-21 (Tue, 21 Fe

[Nix-dev] [ANN] docker-nix-builder beta

Did you ever have to battle with a user that only wants to have Docker installed on his system? Or a user that is developing on macOS and has broken nix packages? docker-nix-builder is a tool to help smooth the transition. Instead of using nix to build the project, use Docker to run nix to build

Re: [Nix-dev] Explicitly selecting sources for "src" in stdenv.mkDerivation?

I've been using filterSource. It works okay but is a bit too generic. It would be nice to have a function that understands a gitignore-like syntax. On Thu, 16 Feb 2017, 12:44 Profpatsch, wrote: > On 17-02-16 01:28pm, Freddy Rietdijk wrote: > > > src = [

Re: [Nix-dev] buildMaven usage

Hi laverne, did you manage to figure it out? I think the usage would be to run https://github.com/NixOS/mvn2nix-maven-plugin on your project and then in your default.nix add something like: ``` { pkgs ? import {} , buildMaven ? pkgs.buildMaven }: buildMaven ./infofile ``` Where the

Re: [Nix-dev] nix-shell (was: Python 3 as default)

Point 4 is really the biggest problem for me because the user loses control. Especially when combined with direnv the user might be surprised with a big update by just changing directory. I think that this can be solved using a profile. The user would load the profile with nix-shell and use

Re: [Nix-dev] "Monitoring" NixOS?

It would be useful to know how far behind a machine is given a specific channel. Especially if you care about security updates. A "needs reboot" flag for when the kernel is updated. GC state or just store size. And the the common Linux monitoring metrics apply for vmm, CPU, net, io, entropy

[Nix-dev] RFC for RFCs

Hi all, we discussed of introducing a RFC process during FOSDEM. The goal is to help discussion for large or controversial changes which typically grind to a halt. Here is an initial proposal based on the one from the Rust community: https://github.com/zimbatm/rfcs/pull/1 . Please let me know

Re: [Nix-dev] help with patch for screen locking

Regarding the suid bit, why don't we let the program decide what suid should be applied to it's programs? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/22532 On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 19:38 wrote: > On 2017-02-07 19:50, Tomasz Czyż wrote: > > David, > > > > I assume you are not talking

Re: [Nix-dev] help with patch for screen locking

As a user I would expect slock to be installed and added to the suid list if I selected it as my screensaver. That way I can also invoke it manually in cases where I want to lock the screen manually. On Mon, 6 Feb 2017, 23:51 , wrote: > Hi! > I am making a patch to fix issue

Re: [Nix-dev] Fosdem

We have a telegram group going: +44 7857103063 On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 at 09:56 Adrien Devresse wrote: > Ok to meet up :) > > name: adev > > > Le 04/02/17 à 01:09, Franz Pletz a écrit : > > We will probably be hacking somewhere on the venue in between talks. > Ping me on IRC if you

Re: [Nix-dev] nix on ubuntu/debian. replace core packages.

Even with hibernation it's not really possible to boot into another OS that quickly. If you want both systems running side by side it's probably easier to use a VM. On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 at 15:50 Peter Holm <peter.g.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was accidently posting this directly to z

Re: [Nix-dev] Shutting down prs.nix.gsc.io

Ouch. How much is "very very"? Try to talk to the Amazon support, they might help you with the bill. Happy to chip in as well. As for the reason, it's probably because the machines are hosted outside of AWS and constantly pulling from S3. Amazon has outrageous egress pricing. You will probably be

Re: [Nix-dev] Fosdem

Count me in! On Mon, 30 Jan 2017, 21:56 Putten, A. van (Arian), wrote: > I will be there! > -- > *From:* nix-dev-boun...@lists.science.uu.nl [ > nix-dev-boun...@lists.science.uu.nl] on behalf of Nathan Bijnens [ > nat...@nathan.gs] > *Sent:*

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 36ac70: tetex: fix source urls

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 36ac7058d2859c8544a2140f245c7c980900c6ac https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/36ac7058d2859c8544a2140f245c7c980900c6ac Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-01-24 (Tue, 24 Ja

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

Nice, thanks On Sun, 15 Jan 2017, 09:12 Benno Fünfstück, <benno.fuenfstu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Cool, that's a really nice feature. With hub, you should be able to do: > > $ hub remote add -p $user > > To get RW access > > zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> sch

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] f9a9ea: Revert "nodePackages.yarn: remove package"

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: f9a9ea920a3bf225a932220e6bce0ba0f947542d https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/f9a9ea920a3bf225a932220e6bce0ba0f947542d Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2017-01-15 (Sun, 15 Ja

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

remote properly either. ​ On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 at 23:02 zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> wrote: > As the person submitting the PR, there is a checkbox (that is checked by > default) that grants reviewers access to the branch. > > As a reviewer, the procedure is to git remote add $user

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

d to give him access to your repo for this, > or is there some github-integrated way that I don't know of to push changes > to branches of a PR? > > zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> schrieb am Fr., 6. Jan. 2017 um 21:17 Uhr: > > No not that I know of. It would be awkward to maintain because homebrew &g

Re: [Nix-dev] Typing nix − funding campaign

Thanks everyone! I'm impressed by how fast that went. On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 at 20:27 Domen Kožar wrote: > It's funded :) Congratz! > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Théophane Hufschmitt < > rg_ni...@regnat.ovh> wrote: > > Thu 12 Jan 17 − 14:13, Théophane

Re: [Nix-dev] Call For Maintainers - Fractalide BETA release

Ironically I didn't get the original message but now have 10 more emails to read, not all of them super friendly. As far as I know there are no explicit rules for the mailing list so it's open for interpretation. If we want to set more rules then we need a document that we can refer people to, and

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

Thalheim <jo...@higgsboson.tk> wrote: > I actually mean the other way around. > > > On 2017-01-06 20:57, zimbatm wrote: > > Yes that's the package. It installs nix with the nixpkgs-unstable > channel. It does basically the same thing as `curl > https://nixos.org/nix/i

Re: [Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

w package for nixpkgs? > > > On 2017-01-06 19:40, zimbatm wrote: > > For the lulz I packaged nix for homebrew cask. Now you can `brew cask > install nix`. Anyways, what I wanted to highlight is that the contributiob > process was quite nice, there are probably some ideas

Re: [Nix-dev] Announcing: NixOS Security Team, and Request for Comments

In relation to GPG key signing, I think it's safe to trust online identities it they are established trough enough channels. That's basically what keybase.io is doing, they are a point of contact but the proof of identity is distributed on multiple services. Personal verification is just another

[Nix-dev] Fwd: [caskroom/homebrew-cask] Added nix 1.11.5 (#28531)

ithub.com> Cc: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com>, Author <aut...@noreply.github.com> Merged #28531 <https://github.com/caskroom/homebrew-cask/pull/28531>. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://githu

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 125328: zerotierone: 1.1.12 -> 1.1.14

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 12532879b06d816ba88b52ed8ce5fdad53d6edb7 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/12532879b06d816ba88b52ed8ce5fdad53d6edb7 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-12-27 (Tue, 27 De

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 02c65b: google-chrome: add channel name suffix

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 02c65bdac919fcb0cecc1a157744156ed39b9fc6 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/02c65bdac919fcb0cecc1a157744156ed39b9fc6 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-12-27 (Tue, 27 De

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 004282: flashplayer: 11.2.202.644 -> 24.0.0.186 [Critical ...

a48527239882209 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/435b5f8da08665600c1c93723a48527239882209 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-12-25 (Sun, 25 Dec 2016) Changed paths: R pkgs/applications/networking/browsers/mozilla-plugins/flashplayer-11/defau

Re: [Nix-dev] Channels, LetsEncrypt, and Security fixes from 2016-12-23 01:26 UTC

are passing. On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 at 13:10 Graham Christensen <gra...@grahamc.com> wrote: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> writes: > Thanks Graham. > > I pushed the Exim updates for CVE-2016-9963 as well. > > master: 352e167c224: exim: 4.87 -> 4.88 for CVE-2016-9963 > release

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] a54d84: Revert "pythonPackages.webencodings: init at 0.5"

Branch: refs/heads/release-16.09 Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: a54d84e0bb0d01f4c0c751cafd836d24a9f43a8e https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/a54d84e0bb0d01f4c0c751cafd836d24a9f43a8e Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-12-25 (Sun, 25 De

Re: [Nix-dev] ats2 advance version to 0.2.13

Thanks Karn, applied to master On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 at 14:49 Karn Kallio wrote: > > The attached patch advances the version of the ats2 nixpkgs expression > to the latest released version 0.2.13 > ___ > nix-dev mailing list

Re: [Nix-dev] Channels, LetsEncrypt, and Security fixes from 2016-12-23 01:26 UTC

Thanks Graham. I pushed the Exim updates for CVE-2016-9963 as well. master: 352e167c224: exim: 4.87 -> 4.88 for CVE-2016-9963 release-16.09: d6bff30c96ed6: exim: 4.87 -> 4.87.1 for CVE-2016-9963 The release branch only got the tiny update to avoid breaking backward-compatibility. On Fri, 23

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] d6bff3: exim: 4.87 -> 4.87.1 for CVE-2016-9963

Branch: refs/heads/release-16.09 Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: d6bff30c96ed675124667dcd500a562234159bc9 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/d6bff30c96ed675124667dcd500a562234159bc9 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-12-25 (Sun, 25 De

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 352e16: exim: 4.87 -> 4.88 for CVE-2016-9963

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 352e167c224e5d98076ca9653d2124c351d969d1 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/352e167c224e5d98076ca9653d2124c351d969d1 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-12-25 (Sun, 25 De

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] c38b4d: strongswan: 5.5.0 -> 5.5.1

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: c38b4da9946b32267301ccf352731ed2d80cc2f6 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/c38b4da9946b32267301ccf352731ed2d80cc2f6 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-12-24 (Sat, 24 De

Re: [Nix-dev] Holiday Security Patch Schedule, Embargoed Exim Patch on 2016-12-25

Alright, I got this. I will make the tiny bump on 16.04 and minor bump on master. On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, 00:55 Graham Christensen, <gra...@grahamc.com> wrote: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> writes: > What is the URL to check for the security update? I assume it will be on >

Re: [Nix-dev] Testing Nginx public entry points with NixOps/libvirtd

Hi, Your VM needs to be reachable from the internet for letsencrypt to work. If it's only for internal usage the best thing to do is to provision the machine with certificates that you generate yourself and add a condition for production. Alternatively keep it plain HTTP and have a tunnel in

Re: [Nix-dev] Usability: Nixpkg > NixOS

t these days... > > N. > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016, 18:44 zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> wrote: > > I'm impressed at the community response on my borderly trollish email :) > > It doesn't look like we can agree on an entry point to the ecosystem as > everyone here has diff

Re: [Nix-dev] Holiday Security Patch Schedule, Embargoed Exim Patch on 2016-12-25

Hey Graham, Thanks again for doing this. If nobody else is taking it I can have a go at it. What is the URL to check for the security update? I assume it will be on the github issue? Cheers, z On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, 15:07 Graham Christensen, wrote: > > IMPORTANT TLDR: On

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 0c7afc: goaccess: 1.0 -> 1.1.1

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 0c7afce7dd69a4ca02591b9d505527cec38dfe69 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/0c7afce7dd69a4ca02591b9d505527cec38dfe69 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-12-19 (Mon, 19 De

Re: [Nix-dev] Usability: Nixpkg > NixOS

I'm impressed at the community response on my borderly trollish email :) It doesn't look like we can agree on an entry point to the ecosystem as everyone here has different opinions. On the other hand, presenting all the options upfront is also intimidating to the newcomer. So maybe the solution

[Nix-dev] Usability: Nixpkg > NixOS

Hi community, I have been thinking on how to communicate to newcomers and I have come to the conclusion that "nixpkg" is the best term to talk about our ecosystem as whole. The nixos.org website for example starts with NixOS and then the user has to backtrack to the other parts of the ecosystem.

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 2a224c: fzf: 0.15.1 -> 0.15.9

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: 2a224c6795582068a0cb9936bcb8c34dbce340c6 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/2a224c6795582068a0cb9936bcb8c34dbce340c6 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-12-14 (Wed, 14 De

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] cbdc94: buildGoPackage: remove go version from name (#2111...

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: cbdc94f2b7798ac4b2c0f1b564607e64a03996d2 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/cbdc94f2b7798ac4b2c0f1b564607e64a03996d2 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-12-13 (Tue, 13 De

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] f92816: afl: 2.23b -> 2.35b

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: f9281609aef096cac905cd1081aacc9193ad273f https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/f9281609aef096cac905cd1081aacc9193ad273f Author: zimbatm <zimb...@users.noreply.github.com> Date: 2016-12-11 (Sun,

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] ec7cdd: direnv: 2.9.0 -> 2.10.0

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: ec7cdd95a7f0b323c11ad3ae054f812607e6d784 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/ec7cdd95a7f0b323c11ad3ae054f812607e6d784 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@users.noreply.github.com> Date: 2016-12-10 (Sat,

Re: [Nix-dev] List of companies using NixOS

Thanks, added to the list. @vladimir: do you know what the Intel guys are using nix for? It would be great to have them on the list. On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 at 15:28 Sander van der Burg wrote: > At conference compass (http://conference-compass.com), we're using Hydra > (e.g.

Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS Security Team

+1, thanks for organising this On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, 08:02 Lancelot SIX, wrote: > Big +1 for me for all of the no nominees. > > BR > Lancelot > > On 07/12/2016 04:40, Jonn Mostovoy wrote: > > My 2c: nbp certainly should be nominated ;) > > > > Regarding the proposal — it

Re: [Nix-dev] monitor.nixos.org

Thanks, makes sense. Let's do this! On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, 23:39 Rok Garbas, wrote: > > Are we always updating to the latest version? For example on a release > > branch we might want to pin to a major.minor if the project follows > semver, > > but maybe on master we always want

Re: [Nix-dev] PatchELF in Bundix's postBuild step

Yes that's it. There is also a pkgs.defaultGemConfig that contains common overrides, like injecting libxml for the nokogiri gem. You might want to merge it with your override (or submit yours to nixpkgs). On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, 20:51 Maarten Hoogendoorn, wrote: > OK, I found a

Re: [Nix-dev] monitor.nixos.org

magically support all github projects? I still think that some of this need to be tried out so we might as well adopt garbas' approach for now but it would be nice to have a clearer picture as well. On Thu, 1 Dec 2016, 03:13 Tomasz Czyż, <tomasz.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > zimbatm: I d

Re: [Nix-dev] hotswappable self managing services in nix

For process-level graceful restarts see https://github.com/zimbatm/socketmaster and https://github.com/pusher/crank . Those could be integrated into the activation script. On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 at 09:33 zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> wrote: > Hi Stewart, > > In a HA setup availabili

Re: [Nix-dev] List of companies using NixOS

Thanks, added to the list. At some point I would like to make a survey to find out where the ecosystem could be improved. On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 at 12:57 Prime.vc | Danny Wilson <da...@prime.vc> wrote: > We use and code Nix, Disnix and NixOS at Prime.vc > > > On 20 Nov 2016, at 19

Re: [Nix-dev] cleaning up old configurations

Yes this one is quite confusing. The grub list is generated on activation of a new profile. Try re-running `nixos-rebuild switch`. It might work to just run /run/current-system/activate On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 at 09:11 Henning Thielemann < lemm...@henning-thielemann.de> wrote: > > Another

Re: [Nix-dev] Multiple ssh substituter hosts

seems like a good idea. > > Ideally my hydra service would upload the nars it builds to a private s3 > bucket. Then my machines need to use this private s3 bucket as a binary > cache. > > Is there any documentation on how to do this? > > On 20 November 2016 at 22:34, zimbatm

Re: [Nix-dev] Multiple ssh substituter hosts

so see that supporting more hosts is listed as a TODO: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/master/src/download-via-ssh/download-via-ssh.cc#L18 Hopefully that gets implemented some day! Cheers, Bas On 20 November 2016 at 20:13, zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> wrote: Hi Bas, It looks li

Re: [Nix-dev] Multiple ssh substituter hosts

Hi Bas, It looks like it's only taking the first host from the list[1]. I suppose the intention was to provide fallbacks but it didn't get implemented. [1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/master/src/download-via-ssh/download-via-ssh.cc#L114 On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 at 15:49 Bas van Dijk

[Nix-dev] List of companies using NixOS

Hi all, I am collecting a list of companies that are using NixOS. The idea is to encourage adoption by validation. The list is over here: https://www.reddit.com/r/NixOS/comments/5dz8fp/list_of_companies_using_nixos/ If you don't feel like posting on Reddit just post here and I'll add them over

[Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] a60a58: terraform: 0.7.10 -> 0.7.11

Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs Commit: a60a584cb6ebcc9da2ae74e672dd537117849f10 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/a60a584cb6ebcc9da2ae74e672dd537117849f10 Author: zimbatm <zimb...@zimbatm.com> Date: 2016-11-16 (Wed, 16 No

[Nix-dev] Moving zimbatm/nixbox to NixOS/nixbox

Hi all, I would like to move https://github.com/zimbatm/nixbox/ to the nixos org. I am depending on https://atlas.hashicorp.org/ to build and distribute the vagrant boxes. They are a paying service but willing to make an exception if I move the project to the NixOS org, probably because it has

  1   2   3   4   5   >