Thanks for the link and I think I understand, but it's beyond my current
experience to do it quickly and correctly. So for now it's probably best to
leave well enough alone :)
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:34 AM Shea Levy wrote:
> See [1], though I should have wrapped the
See [1], though I should have wrapped the callPackage call in lowPrio
(See e.g. [2] for an example of using lowPrio).
[1]:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/01f571148583bcc85fad1963536a788d828befbf
[2]:
If you can point to me an example I'll prepare a pull request.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 5:43 AM Shea Levy wrote:
> We could bring vim 8 to 16.09, as long as it had a separate attribute
> and were set lo-prio so only people who explicitly asked for it would
> get it.
>
> Domen
This would be nice.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 4:36 AM Tomasz Czyż wrote:
> Domen: I remember you were preparing some document/page about doing
> releases.
> Do you need help there?
>
>
> 2016-09-29 4:33 GMT+01:00 Wink Saville :
>
>> What is the criteria for
We could bring vim 8 to 16.09, as long as it had a separate attribute
and were set lo-prio so only people who explicitly asked for it would
get it.
Domen Kožar writes:
> After the branch off (beta release) we only port minor updates and security
> upgrades. It's a day until the
Domen: I remember you were preparing some document/page about doing
releases.
Do you need help there?
2016-09-29 4:33 GMT+01:00 Wink Saville :
> What is the criteria for inclusion in 16.09, any possibility we could
> include 16.09?
>
> -- Wink
>
>
After the branch off (beta release) we only port minor updates and security
upgrades. It's a day until the release so we can't do a major vim upgrade
since we risk there are issues and it's an important part of the ecosystem.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Wink Saville wrote:
What is the criteria for inclusion in 16.09, any possibility we could
include 16.09?
-- Wink
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev