I'm using haskellngPackages now on nixos unstable and it doesn't seem to
have all versions of all dependencies... I thought that was part of the
problem it was solving?
Maybe that makes me sound greedy, but would it be possible and/or plausible
to do this? If not what are the issues being faced?
Hi Eike,
That worked wonderfully! Thank you.
I have updated the aforementioned wiki page's Java instructions to include
this icedtea option.
https://nixos.org/wiki/Enable_Browser_Plugins
Is there a way for me to discover other useful configuration options like
this?
- Chad
On Sun, Feb 15,
I have the following in my configuration.nix and I'm using NixOS
15.05pre58123.9775f46 and tracking the unstable channel:
packageOverrides = pkgs: with pkgs; {
helloEnv = pkgs.myEnvFun {
name = someEnvName;
buildInputs = [ hello ];
};
sdlEnv =
What I'd like much better is an option to use an external database; then I
could use a replicated cluster or something like that to eliminate the
single point of failure. The last thing I want is my ops team being locked
out of nixops during an emergency.
nixops accesses the .nix config
Hi Anderson,
I have been using the Nix Modifying Packages document to help me install
a more recent kernel (work in process still...).
It doesn't seem to offer anything like Gentoo's virtual packages, though.
Thanks for trying!
- Chad
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Anderson Torres
Hi,
I intend to add an automatic download option for software packages where
the user needs to accept a special license, like for example oraclejdk.
At the moment the nixpkgs build tool points to a specific download page,
and the users have to download the package themselves.
I would like to add
As far as I understand, this is already happening if possible. That is,
once you agree to have packages with unfree licenses, they will be fetched
for you. And will we have to accept licenses one by one or altogether (as
it is happening now) is a separate discussion.
The problem with Oracle JDK
On 18-02-2015 22:20:21, Vladimír Čunát wrote:
On 02/18/2015 09:51 AM, Nathan Bijnens wrote:
My vote is to remove merged branches without historical significance
(version 0.5 is a keeper, like upstart), and then any branches that
got their last push before August 2014 are renamed to
Best way is to have a shared machine to deploy from.
Another option would be to create a web interface for nixops.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Thomas Hunger tehun...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been a happy user of nixops for my own projects for a while. It works
fine as a single user
At skedge.me, we've recently switched over to nixops for all deployments,
so we've run into this issue as well. We're moving towards the shared
machine approach, but it's not completely satisfying, because it creates a
single point of failure.
What I'd like much better is an option to use an
It shouldn't be much work to support any SQL db by refactoring nixops to
use sqlalhemy orm.
On 21 Feb 2015 13:10, Ryan Trinkle ryan.trin...@gmail.com wrote:
At skedge.me, we've recently switched over to nixops for all deployments,
so we've run into this issue as well. We're moving towards the
11 matches
Mail list logo
