Hi,
I just discovered NixOS and I'm stoked!
Here's a question I couldn't find an answer to easily: Suppose you're
running nginx as a proxy for a bunch of services. How would you configure
that? Normally, I'd install the latest nginx and then change its
configuration by adding files to
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell
vi...@viric.namewrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 11:28:26AM +0100, Wout Mertens wrote:
Here's a question I couldn't find an answer to easily: Suppose you're
running nginx as a proxy for a bunch of services. How would you configure
I fixed it by stracing mkfs. btrfs and creating a symlink to /. Basically
it gets confused by the bind mounts and looks for root at the original
location.
So just strace -eopen mkfs... and look for enoent.
On phone, sorry for lack of details.
On Apr 13, 2014 12:41 PM, Alexei Robyn
Actually, I wasn't being clear, I only fixed it for me :-)
Sorry...
On Apr 16, 2014 3:11 AM, Thomas Strobel ts...@cam.ac.uk wrote:
Thank you very much for looking into it and fixing it so quickly!
On Tue, 2014-04-15 at 08:52 +0200, Wout Mertens wrote:
I fixed it by stracing mkfs. btrfs
:09:32AM +0200, Wout Mertens wrote:
Actually, I wasn't being clear, I only fixed it for me :-)
I remember going through this too, two years ago. At some point I reported
that
upstream, and as I didn't install anything else, I hoped someone fixed it.
On Apr 16, 2014 3:11 AM, Thomas Strobel ts
It looks like you are trying to do a UEFI boot but not providing the
correct partition mounted in /boot.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Gummiboot#Updating
On Apr 27, 2014 2:15 PM, José Romildo Malaquias j.romi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello.
When installation NixOS unstable on my x86_64
PM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/04/2014 13:50, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 06:30:12AM +0200, Wout Mertens wrote:
It looks like you are trying to do a UEFI boot but not providing the
correct partition mounted in /boot.
https
Hmmm - nix-build also has --run-env which makes a temporary environment but
is listed in the source as obsolete. I wonder what the correct way is,
nix-shell doesn't build your derivation.
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/2b6c8ef40121fdc418551e9b780bb909477c9a3c/scripts/nix-build.in#L196
Wout.
Looks like your root disk got corrupted?
On May 12, 2014 10:19 AM, Corentin Henry corentinhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install Nixos in virtualbox. I follow
insttructions from here :
https://nixos.org/wiki/Installing_NixOS_in_a_VirtualBox_guest
$ fdisk /dev/sda ;# Create only
I think you should keep your filesystem config as an attribute set, not an
array.
The module maps it to an array internally by copying the name into
mountPoint if it doesn't exist and using attrValues.
On May 14, 2014 2:33 AM, Corentin Henry corentinhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your
You know, this feels a little wrong.
/etc/nixos+nixpkgs describes the whole system, including how to build it,
and here the build process will differ depending on previous state.
Wouldn't it make more sense to build the nix config before building the
rest? Or at least use the new config for the
Hi Mateusz,
What I do is update the channel and then check out the commit that
corresponds to it. That way, only your changes should trigger compiles.
On May 23, 2014 1:02 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk fuuze...@fuuzetsu.co.uk
wrote:
Hi,
Is there some kind of a priority system on Hydra? As far as I
This seems to be triggered by
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/master/src/libstore/globals.cc#L124 ,
which somehow doesn't get an integer value for build-max-jobs...
Do a recursive grep for build-max-jobs, make sure you're not setting it
anywhere else?
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:17 AM, Luca
Did you figure this out? I'm curious too...
On May 21, 2014 9:59 PM, Павел Чуприков pschupri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Following the
https://nixos.org/wiki/Howto_keep_multiple_packages_up_to_date_at_once,
I came up with my ~/.nixpkgs/config.nix file looking like this (for
testing
Maybe use --tree on nix-store? Not at my computer.
On May 25, 2014 10:13 AM, Kirill Elagin kirela...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is what I see (this is a diff of references of gccWrapper for gcc vs.
testgcc):
~
/nix/store/x0ml8lx5220diw4iplia8ry240smb4vl-add-flags
Build it with -K, break and go check out what it does to build
stamp-locations. Possibly it's using a tty or so and you would have to
patch the make file.
Still, weird.
On May 27, 2014 2:31 AM, Anderson Torres torres.anderson...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello, Nixers!
I am with another problem when
So grub doesn’t work? I thought it did?
I saw that the Surface Pro 3 is a Secure Booting UEFI device... It would
make a nice NixOS laptop :-)
Also, the Ubuntu boot loader is apparently signed by Microsoft.
Just random thoughts sorry.
Wout.
On May 26, 2014 2:44 PM, Third3ye tredje...@gmail.com
I think there is room for improvement for installing and using nixpkgs on
another distribution.
I see two big problems:
1. installation
2. environment variables
Installation:
The single-user installation is cute, but realistically you need root
anyway to create /nix so it would be nice
Another issue I just remembered is that of setuid binaries. NixOS has a
mechanism for it, and it could just as easily be used elsewhere. Without
it, you can't easily use qemu for example.
Wout.
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.comwrote:
I think there is room
On May 29, 2014 6:58 PM, Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com
wrote:
Hi,
On 29/05/14 18:34, Wout Mertens wrote:
Another issue I just remembered is that of setuid binaries. NixOS has a
mechanism for it, and it could just as easily be used elsewhere.
Without it, you
can't easily use
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:23 PM, John Wiegley jo...@newartisans.com
wrote:
Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com writes:
I think there is room for improvement for installing and using nixpkgs on
another distribution.
I see two big problems:
1. installation
2. environment variables
I turned that into a wiki page with bad formatting (on phone)
https://nixos.org/wiki/Download_all_sources
I hope my explanation is correct.
Wout.
On May 30, 2014 10:59 AM, Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com
wrote:
Hi,
On 30/05/14 09:48, Sergey Mironov wrote:
Hi! I am managing an
Shell: why don't you make a mockup or create a pull request:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-homepage
Ertugrul: Looks like your wish was granted:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-homepage/commit/6803987bce4ff4bca1a5482ef25bfa99f4023538
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Shell Turner
So concretely:
- Help should be Documentation or Docs, I tripped over the same
thing
- I miss the very visible introduction to each of the components
- Nix begets Nixpkgs begets NixOS begets NixOps (so is DisNix dead?).
- The Projects pulldown could be converted into vertical
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com
wrote:
Obligatory link: http://shouldiuseacarousel.com/
To be fair, this carousel doesn't stop on mouseover, and it complains that
users don't interact with them. I see carousels more as a highlighter for
lazy visitors.
Hi all,
what is the procedure for upgrading KDE? Is it simply creating a new
kde-4.13 tree with the new source versions or is it more involved?
Is anybody working on this?
Cheers,
Wout.
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
Hi Eelco!
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com
wrote:
On 01/06/14 09:58, Wout Mertens wrote:
* Nixpkgs should be more visible
Actually, a major goal in the redesign was to *get rid* of all the
non-NixOS
stuff. It's the NixOS homepage, after all
-forward update. I'll get there.
Wout.
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com
wrote:
Hi Wout,
On 01/06/14 18:45, Wout Mertens wrote:
what is the procedure for upgrading KDE? Is it simply creating a new
kde-4.13
tree with the new source versions
I'll add it.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/02/2014 04:59 PM, Eelco Dolstra wrote:
A bit more:
* Copy kde-4.12 to kde-4.13.
* Download all of KDE locally, via wget -r
http://download.kde.org/stable/4.13.1; or something like that.
* Run
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Kirill Elagin kirela...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously systemd would then have to not do things that udev etc are
already doing... Just running services, opening sockets, handling cgroups...
I doubt systemd can do this.
First of all, with the new kernel cgroups
I really don't like that Nixpkgs is being buried in favor of NixOS. More
people using Nixpkgs = more bugs found+fixed, more packages, newer
versions, more switches to NixOS.
Nixpkgs is a stepping stone.
Why point Homebrew users to Nix? They only want to have an nginx install,
or a more recent
at 1:21 AM, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Kirill Elagin kirela...@gmail.com
wrote:
Obviously systemd would then have to not do things that udev etc are
already doing... Just running services, opening sockets, handling
cgroups...
I doubt
Shouldn't the fonts module add defined fonts to environment.systemPackages
then?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:03 AM, Michael Raskin 7c6f4...@mail.ru wrote:
On 06/10/2014 02:29 AM, Daniel Bergey wrote:
A few weeks back I struggled with fonts, asked some questions on IRC,
and wrote up what I
, 0 dirs
~~~
Then `fc-list` and `grep` for your font. If it's there, then the issue is
in your application.
--
Кирилл Елагин
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com
wrote:
Shouldn't the fonts module add defined fonts
I updated the page.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Daniel Bergey ber...@alum.mit.edu wrote:
On 2014-06-10 at 08:46, Wout Mertens wrote:
True... so https://nixos.org/wiki/Fonts is wrong :)
Well, no surprise that after 2 months using NixOS I'm still confused. :)
But it turns out the way
is there anything we can do to help, or is the interface still being
defined?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com
wrote:
Hi,
On 09/06/14 17:35, Pieter Noordhuis wrote:
My question: is the work in the multiple-outputs branch ongoing and
will it be
Some of the options are a bit more complex than simply the font package (at
least the ghostscript one), and I forgot to remove enableCorefonts :)
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Mateusz Kowalczyk fuuze...@fuuzetsu.co.uk
wrote:
On 06/10/2014 08:26 PM, Wout Mertens wrote:
I updated the page
So, did anybody take a stab at getting
http://pipelight.net/cms/page-wine.html working yet?
It uses a patched Wine 32 bit build to provide Silverlight and other
Windows-only browser plugins on Linux.
I thought I'd get some opinions before tackling it... Any experiences with
32bit builds on 64bit
When you compile things, they will store the absolute paths to their
dependencies, be it libraries, fonts, datafiles...
If it didn't do that, installs wouldn't be stateless.
Try asking your sysadmin if you can have /nix, you never know :-)
In any case, if you don't manage to compile Nix,
I have the distinct impression that Eelco neither wants to promote nor
discourage NixOS evangelism... which I totally understand. More newbies
means more noise but OTOH means more eyeballs and developers.
In any case, +1 from me. Would be nice to have more than 1 person in the
interview though...
You can do a nixos-rebuild test or a nix-build - A system.
Either way you have to make sure it's using your own nixpkgs/nixos.
Then you can look at the resulting cron job in the result.
On Jun 16, 2014 6:57 AM, Mateusz Kowalczyk fuuze...@fuuzetsu.co.uk
wrote:
Greetings,
I just opened [1] and
I took a look at the sparse documentation on the Wiki, and couldn't figure
out the Ruby overlay thing.
I want to run a Ruby application which comes with a Gemfile and I resorted
to starting a *nix-shell -p ruby -p rubyLibs.bundler* under which I do *bundle
install --path=$PWD*.
This more or less
Hi Roger,
to override in this way, you can merge attribute sets with the // operator,
which will prefer the attribute on the right-hand side.
http://nixos.org/nix/manual/#idm47361539098656
you get the duplicate error because the language is functional, everything
at the same level is evaluated
Just create a wrapper for nixops that calls nix-shell --pure -p nix -p
nixos --command nixops?
Wout.
On Aug 20, 2014 6:56 PM, Richard Wallace rwall...@thewallacepack.net
wrote:
Aha! Because I started with `nix-shell --pure -p nixops` none of the nix
commands were in my $PATH and I didn't even
just aren't getting
along. If I could get that resolved, I think I'd be off to the races. :)
Rich
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just create a wrapper for nixops that calls nix-shell --pure -p nix -p
nixos --command nixops?
Wout.
On Aug 20
21, 2014 at 3:13 AM, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Rich,
you have to specify the attribute for virtualbox, not the package name.
So linuxPackages.virtualbox in this case. You can find the attributes with
nix-env -qaP
Wout.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Richard Wallace
Hi Sprinters,
Wel there be any livestream? Unfortunately I couldn't make it but instead
me and some friends are doing a mini sprint today here in Belgium.
Shall we try to connect over video or is irc sufficient?
Wout.
___
nix-dev mailing list
Don't forget the nix-env -u case which updates based on name (in fact, that
kinda sucks for sub-attributes like python packages, there are lots of
attributes mapping to the same names).
Wout.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Florent Becker florent.bec...@ens-lyon.org
wrote:
On 01/09/2014
As a sysadmin, I love systemd and journald. If you want to maintain lots of
disparate things and look all over the OS while troubleshooting, good for
you, but systemctl and journalctl make life so much easier. Upstart is a
very poor substitute.
Anyway, systemd is only available on Linux kernels
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/01/2014 10:59 PM, Wout Mertens wrote:
Furthermore, it's still not available out-of-the-box in Docker, so you
can't install a NixOS image in Docker.
IIRC, at the sprint last week, @offlinehacker claimed he made
... And is anybody working on making NixOps work with Azure?
Wout.
On Sep 6, 2014 5:46 AM, Shea Levy s...@shealevy.com wrote:
How is the initial connection managed? Does Azure provide a console, or
some interface to provide the VM with an SSH public key, or some such?
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at
Circumstantial evidence : my netflix started working lots better on Mac,
because it switched to HTML5 playing. I indeed have the widevine plugin
now.
Wout.
On Sep 15, 2014 3:36 PM, Mathijs Kwik math...@bluescreen303.nl wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, netflix enabled support for the chrome browser,
Isn't the whole point of the fixed-output derivations that the means of
getting there doesn't matter? So if you change the build script but leave
the output hash the same, you're basically saying that the build script
will generate the same output.
I think what you want is to remove a build
So what is the status? I want to help because I think there's a huge
difference between 0 and 1. If we have 0 failures, hopefully we'll try
harder to keep it that way.
Anyway I had a look at the latest evaluation of trunk-combined and it says
there are 1359 still failing...
Does `nixos-rebuild build-vm-with-bootloader` work? If so it would be just
your system/partition layout?
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
After the long awaited unstable channel update (yay!), I unfortunately
get this grub2 install error:
, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 23 September 2014 08:32, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 23 September 2014 08:13, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 22 September 2014 23:21, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does
Worthy of an issue tagging @wkennington in any case :-)
Wout.
On Sep 23, 2014 12:02 PM, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com wrote:
Or this one, which adds blkid:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/36614ff3e290a9330dd8e29bdc6cc38ede1e7001
?
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Domen Kožar
I've stared at it wistfully but didn't get around to it yet :)
Can you please add --show-trace so we can see how the failure happens?
Basically, you're in this bit of code:
It sounds like a necessary evil.
Another option would be to make Hydra super fast... What has been explored
to optimize compile speeds? Using distcc, ccache, SSD, elastic scaling?
What if we had a security build fund that we could use to briefly run 500
machines to complete security builds?
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Michael Raskin 7c6f4...@mail.ru wrote:
It sounds like a necessary evil.
Another option would be to make Hydra super fast... What has been explored
to optimize compile speeds? Using distcc, ccache, SSD, elastic scaling?
What if we had a security build fund
/0b499fb96350636ccb4be1c1416a8ac8a22eef63...ddf5841d74a6037197d0f8aa24a2f3ef9b6de1ba
but I don't see anything that would impact that. Odd. Is anybody even using
that?
Wout.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com
wrote:
So what is the status? I want to help because I think
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Michael Raskin 7c6f4...@mail.ru wrote:
I bet against our package set being buildable in 2 hours — because of
time-critical path likely hitting some non-parallelizable package.
I think most large projects can be compiled via distcc, which means that
all
On Sep 25, 2014 8:19 PM, Peter Simons sim...@cryp.to wrote:
Hi Wout,
Another option would be to make Hydra super fast... What has been
explored to optimize compile speeds? Using distcc, ccache, SSD,
elastic scaling?
Hydra is appears slow because hydra-evaluator is single-threaded. A
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Michael Raskin 7c6f4...@mail.ru wrote:
I bet against our package set being buildable in 2 hours — because of
time-critical path likely hitting some non-parallelizable package.
I
On Sep 28, 2014 3:20 PM, Vladimír Čunát vcu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi.
On 09/28/2014 01:59 PM, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
On 28 September 2014 13:44, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...]
For the last 1-2 years I've had boot.loader.grub.device =
/dev/disk/by-label/240gb in my
Just to let you know I'm doing a happy dance right now :-)
Great stuff!
Wout.
On Sep 30, 2014 2:27 AM, Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com
wrote:
Hi,
Since last week there is a new NixOS channel:
https://nixos.org/channels/nixos-14.04-small
This is a variant of the regular NixOS
Hi all,
TL;DR: I'd like to discuss the empty space between declarative NixOS
systems and imperative nix-env user profiles.
As we all know, nixpkgs provides compiled packages and NixOS ties them
together with environment variables, configuration files and systemd
services.
This dichotomy causes
Hi Eelco,
Can we also have a small channel for unstable?
Most of its build products will be reused by the regular jobs, so it
shouldn't take away too many resources from regular builds, right?
Wout.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/10/2014 03:29,
I'm all for it, +1.
Wout.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Bjørn Forsman bjorn.fors...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone mind if we (slowly) move binaries from $out/sbin to $out/bin?
Arguments for doing it:
1) The sbin vs bin distinction is an historic relic from the past. It
makes little
What does dmesg say, and what is in /proc/partitions?
Also, what kind of hard disk do you have, simple SATA?
Wout.
On Oct 3, 2014 5:14 AM, Joseph Joe j...@reed.edu wrote:
I'm trying to install Nix OS onto my computer. My computer's optical drive
is broken, so I tried installing using a live
Pretty sure this will happen automatically once nixpkgs is more
user-friendly.
Imagine that for example the Discourse team could, instead of distributing
a VM, say install nix and run nix-env -i discourse, which would install
the ruby environment and the required services on any Unix.
Right now,
Hi,
No, the live USB doesn't store changes I'm afraid. What you can do is put
the Ubuntu kernel on the liveUSB, and boot using that instead of the
regular one. That should work, I don't think there are any extra-special
kernel features that NixOS needs.
Then you can install NixOS on your HD, but
FWIW, btrfs and ZFS also do non destructive writes, they're Copy on Write.
As a bonus you get unlimited instant snapshots and lots of other wonderful
things.
I prefer btrfs as it has more of a desktop focus and feature set as well as
being in the kernel, but ZFS is more mature.
Wout.
On Oct 5,
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Tim Barbour t...@categorical.net wrote:
One nice property of NILFS is that every write results in a new checkpoint,
which makes it very cheap to check whether a filesystem has been modified
(other than via low-level disk-editing).
On btrfs you can look at the
Hi Nikolay,
this is a long-known problem with nixpkgs, some packages depend on
environment variables and these don't get set automatically.
To make https work, do `nix-env -i cacert` and then do `export
GIT_SSL_CAINFO=$HOME/.nix-profile/etc/ca-bundle.crt`. git clone should now
work.
We're
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Nikolay Amiantov a...@fmap.me wrote:
On 10/06/2014 10:26 AM, Wout Mertens wrote:
To make https work, do `nix-env -i cacert` and then do `export
GIT_SSL_CAINFO=$HOME/.nix-profile/etc/ca-bundle.crt`. git clone should now
work.
Unfortunately, this does
Finally got around to testing this (on Darwin):
- warn: was a bit confused when the `*nix-build -iA build*` didn't work
in the git clone until I figured out I wasn't on the reengineered branch ;-)
- wtf: I was working in a project with a pre-existing node_modules, and
it was picking
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Joseph Joe j...@reed.edu wrote:
I am still a bit confused. I added the following lines to
/etc/nixos/configuration.nix
nixpkgs.config.packageOverrides = pkgs:
{ linux_3_4 = pkgs.linux_3_4.override {
extraConfig =
''
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Nikolay Amiantov a...@fmap.me wrote:
On 10/06/2014 03:36 PM, Wout Mertens wrote:
Ok, weird. Try also setting OPENSSL_X509_CERT_FILE to that file?
OPENSSL_X509_CERT_FILE was originally set to same path as GIT_SSL_CAINFO.
Setting it to /home/... did no effect
I think you could do this. You would set it up so the nix server does the
compiles and the grid runs distcc. See the wiki, the raspberry pi page has
explanations about distcc.
Note that only one node can write to nix store at the same time due to the
db.
Another option is to have private nix
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Andreas Herrmann andreas...@gmx.ch wrote:
Thank you for the detailed answer.
On Friday 10 October 2014 15:32:52 Wout Mertens wrote:
I think you could do this. You would set it up so the nix server does the
compiles and the grid runs distcc. See the wiki
Hmmm, maybe it's missing other required kernel parameters?
http://cateee.net/lkddb/web-lkddb/SCSI_SAS_ATA.html seems to suggest you
also need to set CONFIG_SCSI_SAS_LIBSAS. I don't know how to run the kernel
configurator on nixos :(
As part of the install, it downloads the nixpkgs expressions to
Unset your LD_LIBRARY_PATH and vote for
https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/366 .
Wout.
On Oct 13, 2014 6:42 PM, Richard Wallace rwall...@thewallacepack.net
wrote:
Hey all,
All of a sudden I'm seeing seg faults with any nix-* commands. Probably
due to some Arch package upgrade. I tried
Hi Joseph Joe,
It seems your kernel configuration didn't make it into your image.
This is where the configuration is read into the evaluation:
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/default.nix#L1
So it either reads the file pointed to by $NIXOS_CONFIG or it gets
nixos-config from
Argh that's wrong, it's not reading default.nix but release.nix which
doesn't let you specify a config. Thinking about that.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Joseph Joe,
It seems your kernel configuration didn't make it into your image
Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com
wrote:
Argh that's wrong, it's not reading default.nix but release.nix which
doesn't let you specify a config. Thinking about that.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Wout Mertens wout.mert...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Joseph Joe,
It seems your kernel configuration
Sounds good, we have travis in place that can do the check for small
changes (x64 only) and the staging branch that serves as inbound.
Too bad github doesn't make it easy to move a PR to another branch... We
should all ask for that feature.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014, 17:46 Nicolas Pierron
I just noticed that https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs has more forks than
stars.
Stars are a merit indicator on github - more stars means more popular, more
eyeballs, more users etc.
So I think we should all be making sure we starred
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs .
Wout.
So did you try switching/reseating the cable? Perhaps put the drive on a
different port? It does seem to be hardware from search results.
It could be that Linux exercises the disk differently from Windows...
Of course it is odd that the Linux mint one works. It would be interesting
to see which
Subject: Re: [Nix-dev] NixOS Live CD
(Graphic) Boot Failure Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 11:26:33 -0500 From: J.
Brian Kelley j...@teksavvy.com j...@teksavvy.com To: Wout Mertens
wout.mert...@gmail.com wout.mert...@gmail.com, Raahul Kumar
raahul.ku...@gmail.com raahul.ku...@gmail.com CC
Can you try the modprobe configs that was suggested?
Opening an issue won't help, we can't reproduce and we're the same guys :-)
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014, 20:17 J. Brian Kelley j...@teksavvy.com wrote:
As a last attempt, I burned the minimal ISO and tried booting it.
Exactly the same result -
Isn't travis a special case for the dynamic cache? It only runs 2 jobs at
most and only when a PR comes in or a commit is done. Basically it's an
extension of Hydra except that it builds PRs and doesn't save build
products...
Seems to me that it is fine for it to use the dynamic binary cache...
How about putting a caching proxy like Squid in front so the nars are
cached?
I'd be happy to set it up for you if you don't have time...
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014, 09:56 Rob Vermaas rob.verm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Isn't travis a special case for the dynamic cache? It only runs 2 jobs at
most
On one hand this is better than on a wiki because it stays up to date.
On the other hand it's kind of weird to give other people write access to
your own configurations...
I also found https://nixos.org/wiki/Real_World_NixOS_Dotfiles , maybe that
would be enough, just mention it in the readme and
On Wed Nov 05 2014 at 4:04:40 PM Eelco Dolstra eelco.dols...@logicblox.com
wrote:
Hi,
On 05/11/14 12:02, Wout Mertens wrote:
How about putting a caching proxy like Squid in front so the nars are
cached?
There already is an Apache reverse proxy in front of it. Since mod_proxy
supports
On Tue Oct 28 2014 at 10:15:03 PM Andreas Herrmann andreas...@gmx.ch
wrote:
in the past two weeks or so I have been experimenting with Nix multi-user
mode. My goal was to be able to reliably install Nix in multi-user mode on
a CentOS 6.5 machine. The result of this was a bash script which
Aha so from
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/f079cd1721cd50d188f3c32387a074bf00afb34d/nixos/modules/services/misc/nix-daemon.nix#L29-L32
(incidentally, I'd love it if somehow that was generated before running the
rest of a nixos-rebuild, so nix options take hold before building)
On Thu Nov
So is proot much slower than native? I suppose it also depends on the
kernel version.
On Thu Nov 06 2014 at 11:11:11 AM Pjotr Prins pjotr.publi...@thebird.nl
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 12:41:40PM +0300, Paul Colomiets wrote:
Hm, that's nice. But given the PRoot works using ptrace, it's
Afaict proot is the most complete...
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014, 16:09 Luca Bruno lethalma...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/11/2014 16:05, Pjotr Prins wrote:
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 02:39:47PM +, Wout Mertens wrote:
So is proot much slower than native? I suppose it also depends on the
kernel
Interesting, this blog says that signing stuff is pointless and instead you
should use a blockchain.
Does anybody know of open source projects that do that?
http://guardtime.com/blog/in-docker-we-trust-containerization-security-and-trust-models
Wout.
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
