Greetings,
I am not trying to start a flame war or a rant, but I am trying to get a
feel for what Open Source virtualization solutions are actually used.
Currently I have a few servers virtualized inside Xen.
However, I keep hearing that KVM is the way to goTM for hosting websites
if you must
I've used VMWare, in the past, and I currently use Virtual Iron, because it
has fairly simple administration and is far cheaper than VMWare, if you want
the bells and whistles.
The big reasons to use VMWare or Virtual Iron (in my opinion) is the nice
gui administration tools and their ability to
I like VirtualBox.
www.virtualbox.org
They have a rather good enterprise solution as well.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Chris McQuistion [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I've used VMWare, in the past, and I currently use Virtual Iron, because it
has fairly simple administration and is far cheaper
$1/month for 10GB storage and 20GB bandwidth/month at 3ix.com? Personally,
that sounds too good to be true, aka huge overselling. Am I wrong?
Douglass Clem
crashsystems.net
Public Key: http://crashsystems.net/pubkey.asc
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
One more thing that might be worth noting. I had started out making the
jump to VMware Server 2.0 on a 32bit CentOS 5.2 install on a Core 2 Duo box
with 3gb RAM. I had access to another Core 2 Duo box with 4gb RAM. Under
32bit OS, you are limited to just over 3gb RAM usable. I had read
I have used VMWare in the past. That was because the platform that
development work was being done on was very unstable. With VMWare at
least when something crashes you can take the image that just blew up or
the earlier image and start again without the 'you moved your mouse
please reload'
They could be, but I am running a low-traffic site for my daughter and
her friends. so cheap, and it just works for our needs.
I didn't see Django listed on their 'toys' available. Even their
'unlimited bandwidth' version for $8/mo sounds pretty nice.
Sofar, it has just worked.
Douglass
