This discussion came up on one of the SANS lists recently and unfortunately
I didn't save the thread for the references but there is research showing
that if you have a well funded advisory you are better off wiping the drive
once than physical damage to a level less than than total shredding.
LedgerSMB looks quite interesting. I noticed that it is a fork of SQL-Ledger, but I don't think I saw anything explaining the differences between the two. Also, I was also unable to find a list of features for LedgerSMB. Would you mind pointing me to a link if I've overlooked something?Seeing as
Thought I'd write a quick note exposing my innocence regarding things
wireless network. Those of us using Ubuntu, especially 8.04 or later,
think nothing of connecting to a wireless network with a hidden ESSID.
The Robertson County Chamber of Commerce just upgraded their facility
and did not
On an somewhat unrelated note -- I'd suggest taking a look at homebank. It
isn't exactly geared for businesses, but it's very easy to use, and has some
nice graphing capabilities. I think it's probably the nicest personal
accounting software out for *nix (and amiga/aros).
http://homebank.free.fr/
LedgerSMB forked with SQL-Ledger because the SQL-ledger dev SQL-ledger
dev decided to randomly change the licence without gaining the
approval of all the folks that had contributed to the project and also
refused to accept patches which fixed serious security issues, as in
really simple SQL
Jonathan Moore wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Howard White hwh...@vcch.com wrote:
If using a hidden ESSID is making things difficult for the users, and
doesn't provide any real security why bother with using it? I know
that security is often a trade off with usability, but in this
Howard White wrote:
What was also fun was that the two different Windows XP systems acted
quite differently regarding their wireless property screens. Consistent
user interface? Fat chance!
You mentioned The director's laptop had a Dell specific utility that
made connecting to a WAP
JMJ wrote:
Howard White wrote:
What was also fun was that the two different Windows XP systems acted
quite differently regarding their wireless property screens. Consistent
user interface? Fat chance!
You mentioned The director's laptop had a Dell specific utility that
made
Howard, why are you using WEP? WEP is totally broken and can now be cracked
within 60 seconds! Please, please, please use WPA.
In this installation, if they need two wireless networks, why not just set
up one with WPA encryption called Private_Network and another one using no
encryption (on a
