Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 16 May 2002, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> > one sticking point is that the copyright pedigree of nmh is not clear.
> > Currently, the copyright of nmh is assigned to "The Authors of nmh" and
> > that's a little fuzzy (also, not all of the source code f
On May 16, 2002 at 14:25, Shantonu Sen wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2002, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> > one sticking point is that the copyright pedigree of nmh is not clear.
> > Currently, the copyright of nmh is assigned to "The Authors of nmh" and
> > that's a little fuzzy (also, not all of the source c
Any news is good news! Something is happening!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Just wanted to give everyone a quick status update.
> I've been working with the savannah folks on the nmh collection;
> however, one sticking point is that the copyright pedigree of nmh is
> not clear. Currently, the copy
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Ken Hornstein wrote:
> one sticking point is that the copyright pedigree of nmh is not clear.
> Currently, the copyright of nmh is assigned to "The Authors of nmh" and
> that's a little fuzzy (also, not all of the source code files have copyright
> assignments, and that's a
Just wanted to give everyone a quick status update.
I've been working with the savannah folks on the nmh collection; however,
one sticking point is that the copyright pedigree of nmh is not clear.
Currently, the copyright of nmh is assigned to "The Authors of nmh" and
that's a little fuzzy (also,
