Re: [Nmh-workers] Does maildrop work correctly with nmh?

2013-05-13 Thread rader
I looked into it seriously but stayed with procmail... I ended up automating the creation of my procmailrc from a file that looks a whole lot like a ~/.maildelivery file. That makes the configuration information far more dense, easily grep'able and results in verbose logging. steve -- On Sun,

Re: [Nmh-workers] refile handling of corrupt .mh_sequences

2013-02-28 Thread rader
that, could you? Ah, okay, I see that Steve Rader tried to get people interested in improving the sequence support, and was basically told screw you hippie, it kills performance. Which I guess is why he wrote MH-V :-) To be fair, I think there was some chance that my fixes for good MH support

Re: [Nmh-workers] refile handling of corrupt .mh_sequences

2013-02-28 Thread rader
to fix = that, could you? Ah, okay, I see that Steve Rader tried to get people = interested in improving the sequence support, and was basically told = screw you hippie, it kills performance. Which I guess is why he = wrote MH-V :-) Yep. I've had similar interactions with the claws-mail

Re: [Nmh-workers] refile handling of corrupt .mh_sequences

2013-02-28 Thread rader
Yep. I've had similar interactions with the claws-mail folks... However, their GUI is better than exmh, particularly for the increasing number of attachments I'm receiving (well, that may not be fair...I should take a look at any changes to exmh in the last 18 months). You know, the

Re: [Nmh-workers] Every Three Minutes

2013-02-04 Thread rader
On Mon, Feb 4 2013 at 11:14am EST, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I hope you realize I was just kidding around. I'm (mostly) fine with people cc'ing themselves on email, but I personally think Fcc: is a lot more efficient (also, I have never in my life needed to refer to a

[Nmh-workers] troff 4 column output [OT]

2013-01-01 Thread rader
Do any of you have a working example that uses troff/groff (mm macros?) to print four column output? I'll bet someone does. Or perhaps a troff expert would kindly whip up an example that correctly uses the mm MC and MULN macros?? Rawr, ye dinsaours. happy new year, steve --

[Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T

2012-12-19 Thread rader
I had Nmh stumble on a mime msg for the first time ever just now. The workaround was to edit the C-T from file/pdf to application/pdf. MUA was Apple Mail (2.1084). The PDF was inside a forwarded msg so perhaps Mail.app isn't at fault. Just fyi; I'm not looking for a cure. steve -- $

Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T

2012-12-19 Thread rader
Content-Type: file/pdf; file is not a registered Media Type according to IANA: Yeah, that's completely mega-bozo. According to my reading of RFC 2046, you're allowed to treat unknown _subtypes_ as application/octet-stream (well, it depends), but it is mum on what's supposed to

Re: [Nmh-workers] pick(1) decode RFC-2047 headers?

2012-11-24 Thread rader
+1 too. Anything that works in terms of lines is outdated at this point. Eek! (Squealing like a mouse in the inside.) steve -- On Sat, Nov 24 2012 at 9:40am PST, P Vixie p...@redbarn.org wrote: +1. Anything that works in terms of lines is outdated at this point. Ken Hornstein

Re: [Nmh-workers] somewhat OT: re procmail or ??

2012-11-23 Thread rader
: /^To:.*nmh/ Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] somewhat OT: re procmail or ?? Folder: rcvstore +mh 4840 $ mkprocmailrc regenerated /home/rader/Mail/procmailrc 35c35 ## Wed Nov 7 10:57:13 CST 2012 --- ## Fri Nov 23 13:34:05 CST 2012 318a319,325 * ^From

Re: [Nmh-workers] AM/PM

2012-11-10 Thread rader
er, 00:09am? only works right for 23 of 24 hours? I think you mean 22 of 24 hours, right? Because at noon it will do the same thing. can you add if hour == 0 then hour = 12? Man, I have to write your code for you too?? :-) nmh does come with all of the tools to

Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-v

2012-11-10 Thread rader
When I'm running MH-V on localhost's display, I then do 'v' to have MH-V execute mhstore to save the image attachment and do e.g. firefox -browser file:///home/rader/.mh_cache/23.2.jpeg to bring it up in my browser. Is -browser needed? Donno. I don't use firefox. I use

Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-v

2012-11-10 Thread rader
Playing around with my (poor ol?) Firefox 3.6.13 on SL54, it seems that firefox -browser doesn't work right: it opens the URL in a tab and opens a new window with the startup home page! So I guess that should change to just firefox? Yep. Or xdg-open(1). Oh, right. (xdg-open

Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-v

2012-11-09 Thread rader
[...] http://www.hep.wisc.edu/~rader/mh-v/ I grabbed it and installed it on a Fedora 17 system, which had the few prerequisite packages already installed by some stroke luck. Have been using it 40, 60 hrs/wk since I ditched EXMH in late Dec 2011. I don't know

Re: [Nmh-workers] AM/PM

2012-11-09 Thread rader
Or maybe somebody's already generating AM/PM format using the existing formation functions!? And you can! %(hour12) = %(void(hour{date}))%(modulo 12) %(ampm) = %(void(hour{date}))%(gt 11)PM%|AM% Replace 'date' with your component of choice.

[Nmh-workers] AM/PM

2012-11-07 Thread rader
Is someone here in the position to conveniently add and commit (e.g.) hour12 and ampm mh-format functions for the date component?? Just a thought. Or maybe somebody's already generating AM/PM format using the existing formation functions!? steve --

Re: [Nmh-workers] AM/PM

2012-11-07 Thread rader
On Wed, Nov 7 2012 at 2:22pm EST, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: Or maybe somebody's already generating AM/PM format using the existing formation functions!? And you can! %(hour12) = %(void(hour{date}))%(modulo 12) %(ampm) = %(void(hour{date}))%(gt 11)PM%|AM%

Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?

2012-11-02 Thread rader
So what do others think? That this functionality in a command line tool is silly. If you need a GUI, install exmh. *I* agree that colorization in a command line tool is silly, and thus I would never spend time adding it. But if someone else is motivated to make nmh be able to look

Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?

2012-11-01 Thread rader
That format escape would avoid the issue. +1 for a don't count this format escape. I don't think scan should be assuming anything about what the terminal might take to be an escape sequence. They're not that well standardized. Specifically supporting the terminal types xterm and

Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?

2012-11-01 Thread rader
to this viewpoint ... too bad there wasn't someone who was crazy enough to write a curses-based nmh front-end to let us know what he did :-) Who you callin' crazy? I emailed this directly to David... might be helpful to crib from... http://www.hep.wisc.edu/~rader/mh-v/mh-v.1.0/xtc :) steve

Re: [Nmh-workers] Email access while traveling?

2012-10-29 Thread rader
to... http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2012-01/msg00216.html and... http://www.hep.wisc.edu/~rader/mh-v/ Have been using it 40, 60 hrs/wk since I ditched EXMH in late Dec 2011. Roughly 25k msgs received and 4k msgs sent. Started as a lark after barely getting vmh to compile

[Nmh-workers] re repl'ing to msgs with utf-8 From Subject

2012-10-25 Thread rader
Does someone have a recipe for decoding utf-8 From and Subject when doing repl? (They look something like From: =?utf-8?...=?=.) Looks like neither the standard replcomps form nor a filter with... from:nocomponent,formatfield=From: %(putstr{text}): does the right thing. steve --

Re: [Nmh-workers] re repl'ing to msgs with utf-8 From Subject

2012-10-25 Thread rader
Does someone have a recipe for decoding utf-8 From and Subject when doing repl? (They look something like From: =?utf-8?...=?=.) Looks like neither the standard replcomps form nor a filter with... from:nocomponent,formatfield=From: %(putstr{text}): %decode() ought to do

Re: [Nmh-workers] re repl'ing to msgs with utf-8 From Subject

2012-10-25 Thread rader
We can't (yet) ENCODE RFC2047 headers. So if we decode a From: or Subject: with non-ASCII characters, we're kinda stuck because we'll be sending out something that's invalid according to the RFCs. Right now leaving the encoded headers intact is probably our best bet; that way

Re: [Nmh-workers] Email access while traveling?

2012-10-24 Thread rader
i think an ssh + mh-v on a laptop is a decent replacement for Exmh. someday i'll probably make ssh + mh-v work well on driod (won't take much work) but so far i've avoided owning/wanting a smart phone. (in fact the impending smart phone and/or tablet doom was partial motivation for writing

Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged.

2012-10-11 Thread rader
I suggest sortm without specifying a set of messages be an error. Old behaviour can be got through `sortm all' or a new option that folks can put in ~/.mh_profile if they're happy with it as it was. I agree. I don't see a need for that new option. This should do it, along

Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged.

2012-10-11 Thread rader
How about: 1) change sortm to require msg argument See, I just don't like changing the interface, given there's a significant group of people (so far) who ONLY do sortm all; that impacts them (I don't know if it impacts any front-end interfaces). And this is to just solve the

Re: [Nmh-workers] somewhat OT: re procmail or ??

2012-09-14 Thread rader
If not, does anyone have patches for logging e.g. date, from, to? As per a procmail ML conversation, I cooked up this procmail supermagic... LOG=`formail -X From: -X Date: -X To: -X Cc: | sed 's/^/ /g'` yields e.g... Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 07:44:56 -0500 From: ra...@hep.wisc.edu To:

Re: [Nmh-workers] somewhat OT: re procmail or ??

2012-09-12 Thread rader
Am I dinosaur for still using procmail?? I mean, is there something better? If not, does anyone have patches for logging e.g. date, from, to? OMG, it just occurred to me: maybe it's INFERIOR to slocal these days!?!? :) No patch needed. From my .procmailrc (The first LOG call

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore overwriting files

2012-09-11 Thread rader
I looked quickly at the mhstore code last night and see where to insert the hook for this. That was the hard part. Any suggestions on adding this? -clobber [ask|suffix|never|always] always is the current behavior, and might be the most useful in scripts. But I don't

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore overwriting files

2012-09-11 Thread rader
-clobber auto please!? incremented file names like Firefox download does fu.gif - fu.gif fu(1).gif etc oh, nice. that would be much better than the wget behavior: fu.tar fu.tar.1 fu.tar.2 And... I think preserving the suffix is desireable because

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore overwriting files

2012-09-11 Thread rader
-clobber auto please!? incremented file names like Firefox download does fu.gif - fu.gif fu(1).gif etc oh, nice. that would be much better than the wget behavior: fu.tar fu.tar.1 fu.tar.2 But can Firefox only do that because it's coming up

Re: [Nmh-workers] mhstore overwriting files

2012-09-11 Thread rader
From: Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca On 2012-09-11, at 7:45 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: yeah, but can we not use ()? They really suck if you actually have to \(-type them rather than shell complete them. (And if you have fu.gif and fu(, you have to type the (...)

Re: [Nmh-workers] Attaching graphics files

2012-09-08 Thread rader
But how do I attach a .png file, for example, b.png? or a .jpg file, for example, c.jpg? Those are all under image; image/png and image/jpeg are the MIME types you are interested in. If you use attach at the WhatNow? prompt, it already knows what to do with those filename

Re: [Nmh-workers] Attaching graphics files

2012-09-08 Thread rader
There is also a simpler way: you can just type attach SoundShot.tgz at the Whatnow prompt, but you have to these mysterious settings in ~/.mh_profile... send: -attach X-MH-Attach -attachformat 1 whatnow: -attach X-MH-Attach I forgot to mention the other benefit of method: you

[Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior

2012-08-09 Thread rader
I have... send: -alias aliases -attach X-MH-Attach -attachformat 1 and just sent a PDF with the msg body in plain text via... What now? attach ~/Quote_GSCQ33155_1344264047128.pdf resulting in... X-MH-Attach: /home/rader/Quote_GSCQ33155_1344264047128.pdf I expected, would have liked

[Nmh-workers] Alternate-Mailboxes: failure

2012-08-09 Thread rader
I have... Alternate-Mailboxes: rader, ra...@hep.wisc.edu, ra...@physics.wisc.edu, ra...@hep.physics.wisc.edu yet msgs... cc: ra...@hep.physics.wisc.edu, ra...@hep.wisc.edu ...get delivered to me in duplicate. Bug? Wouldn't it be nice to be able to use globs?!? steve

Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior

2012-08-09 Thread rader
Ah, okay ... yeah, THAT is what's happening. Confirmed: the msg had a utf8 single quote. But that seems wrong to me; what should happen is what happens to other text when processed by mhbuild (namely, it's encoded with q-p and marked with the right character set). That'd be nice.

Re: [Nmh-workers] Alternate-Mailboxes: failure

2012-08-09 Thread rader
Alternate-Mailboxes: rader, ra...@hep.wisc.edu, ra...@physics.wisc.edu, ra...@hep.physics.wisc.edu yet msgs... cc: ra...@hep.physics.wisc.edu, ra...@hep.wisc.edu ...get delivered to me in duplicate. Get _delivered_ to you in duplicate? You mean when you cc yourself

Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior

2012-08-09 Thread rader
Sounds like an itty-bitty job for you, Ken? Sure, but I'm going on vacation on Saturday, so it's kinda low on the priority list. This summer has been rather busy for me, so my time to work on nmh stuff has been lacking. The fix looks straightforward and I expect that I'll get to it

[Nmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

2012-05-07 Thread rader
RHEL (SL) 5 make check FAIL? steve -- *** /home/rader/nmh-1.5-RC2/test/testdir/13559.expected 2012-05-07 14:39:13.0 -0500 --- /home/rader/nmh-1.5-RC2/test/testdir/13559.actual 2012-05-07 14:39:13.0 -0500 *** *** 1 ! 11 12/18 f...@example.edutestThis

[Nmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

2012-05-07 Thread rader
So, looking at those errors ... FAIL: test/bad-input/test-header That _MIGHT_ be because you have a terminal wider than 80 characters; is that true? Obviously we should fix that. Actually, if you want to try fixing that yourself ... in test/bad-input/test-header, change:

Re: [Nmh-workers] scan %{body} bug?

2012-03-19 Thread rader
Looking at things ... it may be a simple fix, actually. I wasn't envisioning any changes to m_getfld(), that's for sure. Alright, I think I've got a fix in there, and I've got a test which exercises the bug. I was right that the fix was simple, but I had to take into account all

Re: [Nmh-workers] Spam: Re: whatnow: can't attach because no header fieldname was given.

2012-03-18 Thread rader
Why not write a one-off script to blast the goodies from /etc/mime.types into etc/mhn.defaults?? I'll do it if they'll get in. Fine by me if no one objects. Send to me and I'll put them in. Included here for all to consider. This is a pretty arbitrary list of hand picked types

Re: [Nmh-workers] Spam: Re: whatnow: can't attach because no header fieldname was given.

2012-03-18 Thread rader
From: ra...@hep.wisc.edu mhshow-suffix-text/plain: .asc .txt and that should be vetted and given a 2nd thought? steve -- ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Re: [Nmh-workers] whatnow: can't attach because no header fieldname was given.

2012-03-17 Thread rader
I haven't looked to see if the attach command for whatnow is using that or not, but certainly, if it is (or if it will, in the future), then it would seem to me that whatnow itself would not even need to make use of any file called mime.types (no matter where located). Currently,

Re: [Nmh-workers] scan %{body} bug?

2012-03-16 Thread rader
Been seeing this, haven't had a chance to track it down. Looking at exmh's .xmhcache files, I have 145,141 total messages listed in .xmhcache entries, and the bug is affecting 3,266 of them. So there's an anectodal value for the frequency. ...but isn't the body sometimes smaller than

Re: [Nmh-workers] scan %{body} bug?

2012-03-16 Thread rader
Could someone forw me one of the affected messages? I'll be glad to track it down. Also, if you could include an MD5/SHA1 checksum of the message I can be sure on this end to recreate it exactly? Will do, off list, in a sec. steve -- ___

Re: [Nmh-workers] scan %{body} bug?

2012-03-16 Thread rader
Punt until the m_getfld() re-write If this was a five-9s thing, like 99.999% working, then I'd be down for that. But it's not, and maybe the fix is fairly simple? If we guess wrong, that would result in one extra read in some cases. Do I understand correctly that we're wringing our hands

Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.4 build failures on RHEL/CentOS 5

2012-02-05 Thread rader
You want to look at dtimep.c (the generated output from dtimep.lex). And from the 1.4 tarball ... yes, it's in there. I don't have one of those. From the savannah tarball: local@riva:~/nmh-1.4% find . -name 'dtimep*' -print ./sbr/dtimep.lex Really? $

[Nmh-workers] par vs vim gqap

2012-01-27 Thread rader
Does par do anything better than doing gqap in Vim? I'm recollection, albeit from a few years ago, is that par inferior. steve -- ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Re: [Nmh-workers] Line wrapping in mhl

2012-01-25 Thread rader
My replgroupcomps is broadly similar to the system one. I think it's the -format that stops the wrapping; repl(1): No, definitely not. I just tried that on a message with long lines and it did the same crappy line wrapping. And I've been inside of that code today and I can't see

Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-v (was repl and mime handling)

2012-01-23 Thread rader
rader I'm not attempting to appeal to the masses. I am rader creating/have created a MH/nmh front end in perl + curses rader that is very fast, vaguely emulates EXMH, does not use a rader mouse, is Vim-ish and has GTK+ colorization. I'll try her on it then. I think

Re: [Nmh-workers] mh-v (was repl and mime handling)

2012-01-18 Thread rader
Is mh-v public? I don't recall it being mentioned before. rader No, mh-v is not public yet. It's a little rough around the rader edges. But it is very functional: it's replaced EXMH for me, rader which I used daily for 16 or 17 years. rader I'll make

[Nmh-workers] mh-v (was repl and mime handling)

2012-01-17 Thread rader
with my own mh front-end (mh-v) Is mh-v public? I don't recall it being mentioned before. No, mh-v is not public yet. It's a little rough around the edges. But it is very functional: it's replaced EXMH for me, which I used daily for 16 or 17 years. I'll make a formal announcement

[Nmh-workers] extraneous header lines

2012-01-10 Thread rader
mhshow outputs a lot of (too many) extraneous header lines. mhshow -form mhl.null outputs no header lines. so, i used to keep putting ignores= entries in ~/Mail/mhl.headers and use mhshow -form mhl.headers now, i've given up, and my mhshow is filtered by an intelligent version of perl -ane

[Nmh-workers] nmh readline support

2011-12-20 Thread rader
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:38:45 CST To: Peter Maydell pmayd...@chiark.greenend.org.uk, nmh-workers@nongnu.org From: ra...@hep.wisc.edu Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion) I like everything you've said. I'll send along a better patch for

Re: [Nmh-workers] A MH-inspired Maildir handler: coma

2011-02-14 Thread rader
$matchdir = '/home/rader/Mail/matches'; my $debug = 0; my $matchwholewords = 0; my $index = 0; my $summary = 0; my $args = ''; my $margs = ''; my $fuzz = ''; my $folder = ''; #-- while (@ARGV) { my $arg = $ARGV[0]; if ( $debug ) { print ARG $arg\n; } shift @ARGV

Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion)

2010-12-21 Thread rader
1.3 2007/04/29 22:34:04 pm215 Exp $ + * $Id: getans.c,v 1.2 2010/12/20 14:03:51 rader Exp rader $ * * This code is Copyright (c) 2002, by the authors of nmh. See the * COPYRIGHT file in the root directory of the nmh distribution for @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ #include setjmp.h #include signal.h

Re: [Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion)

2010-12-21 Thread rader
Thanks. This doesn't actually apply to current head of git, [...] Anyway, some nitpicking on points of detail: That's not nitpicking--just good code reviewing. My C skills really suck. Sorry. I like everything you've said. I'll send along a better patch for consideration soon. steve

[Nmh-workers] Press any key to show content enhancement

2010-12-19 Thread rader
Enclosed is a patch to provide hit any key prompts when displaying multipart mime messages. In certain contexts, which have become common now that I use -attach, I really don't like the default Press return to show content behavior. If someone is willing to fold this into the source, please let

[Nmh-workers] whatnowproc tab completion

2010-12-19 Thread rader
I'm thinking about adding tab completion for file and directory names for whatnowproc. Is that on anyone's to-do list?? steve -- ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

[Nmh-workers] GNU readline whatnowproc (was tab completion)

2010-12-19 Thread rader
I'm thinking about adding tab completion for file and directory names for whatnowproc. Is that on anyone's to-do list?? Not on my list but it be great. Okay then, made it work for me patch enclosed. I'm outa time for now. I'll contribute one that uses an autoconf probe soon--I'm

Re: [Nmh-workers] Fixing decoding of quoted messages in replies

2010-11-01 Thread rader
AFAIK this problem is still unsolved. I only found a hack in the FAQ: Subject: 05.16 How can I convert quoted-printable to 8bit in quoted text in replies? From: Jarle F. Greipsland jarle at idt.unit.no Date: 22 Aug 1995 10:42:07 +0200 wow. below

[Nmh-workers] stealthily adding header lines?

2008-10-21 Thread rader
How do I stealthily add header lines to outgoing mail? I know about the components file, but I want to do it after whatnowproc so I don't see 'em in Editor. I traced post and grep'ed on open() came up empty. If not with nmh, then I'll do it with sendmail, but I'd really like to do it

[Nmh-workers] big thanks

2008-10-21 Thread rader
THANKS YOU ALL, for keeping mh/nmh/exmh alive!! I've done a folder reorg and noticed that I converted from /usr/bin/mail to mh/xmh about 15 years and 16 days ago, give or take. (I found mbox to mh format conversion scripts dated 1993-10-05 in a ~/Mail.bsd directory. Very disappointingly, I

[Nmh-workers] utf-8 subject lines again

2008-10-21 Thread rader
I'm using 1.3 and scan on RFC-2047-encoded headers shows gibberish while show looks right. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2008-04/msg00016.html reads... It's an RFC-2047-encoded header. nmh in CVS seems to cope with that header fine. [...] i seem to be running nmh-1.2. if

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?

2008-10-20 Thread rader
: lockit: *** WARNING *** comp: lockit: GOOD file locking FAILED for /home/rader/Mail/context.lock comp: lockit: filesystem does not support link comp: lockit: doing BAD file locking (non-atomic copy) instead comp: lockit: use at your own risk: you might LOOSE mail!! comp: lockit: (compile

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?

2008-10-19 Thread rader
I just did some googling on this. It seems that link() is really required when dealing with mail spools because it's the only atomic way to lock. So this whole no-links configuration option idea is a bad idea, and I now realize that I'll never be able to safely inc over sshfs.

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?

2008-10-18 Thread rader
I'm hoping to run (exmh over) nmh over sshfs, but it doesn't work because 1) sshfs doesn't implement link()... When I ran Evolution a few years ago and told it about my MH message tree, it went through the tree and broke all of my message links. Because I like the ability to

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh over sshfs?

2008-10-18 Thread rader
bash$ diff -u lock_file.c.orig lock_file.c --- lock_file.c.orig2008-04-05 13:41:37.0 -0500 +++ lock_file.c 2008-10-18 09:53:03.0 -0500 @@ -365,6 +365,9 @@ if ((fd = open (file, access, mode)) == -1) return -1; +/* SR HACK */ +return fd; +

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh-1.1-RC4 post /dev/,LCK.* problem

2005-11-22 Thread rader
This is an issue with dot locking that I brought up about two years ago, but apparently never opened a bug for. This change in behavior is a good reason not to use dot locking as the default. I just opened a bug report for it:

[Nmh-workers] nmh-1.1-RC4 post /tmp/,LCK.* problem

2005-11-14 Thread rader
{SIG_DFL}, 8) = 0 7112 --- SIGSTOP (Stopped (signal)) @ 0 (0) --- 7092 rt_sigaction(SIGQUIT, {SIG_IGN}, unfinished ... 7112 execve(/usr/local/lib/post, [post, -library, /home/rader/Mail, -alias, aliases, -alias, /home/rader/Mail/aliases, /home/rader/Mail/drafts/49], [/* 35 vars */] unfinished