> >How about:
> >1) change sortm to require msg argument
>
> See, I just don't like changing the interface, given there's a
> significant group of people (so far) who ONLY do "sortm all"; that
> impacts them (I don't know if it impacts any front-end interfaces).
> And this is to just solve the problem of Ralph's occasional typos? :-)
> Ok, I don't want to minimize the problem, but I'm just trying
> to weigh in my mind the tradeoffs here.
I agree and thus I think the "sortm -noall and ~/.mh_profile entry for
those who like it" idea is the best proposal yet.
I see in EXMH...
mh.tcl: if {[catch {eval {MhExec sortm +$f} $args} err]} {
and in MH-V...
prompt.pl: &mhv_exec("sortm -textfield date +$cur_folder");
prompt.pl: &mhv_exec("sortm -textfield from -limit 0 +$cur_folder");
prompt.pl: &mhv_exec("sortm -textfield subject -limit 0 +$cur_folder");
prompt.pl: &mhv_exec("sortm -textfield to -limit 0 +$cur_folder");
...fyi.
steve
--
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
