> > I suggest sortm without specifying a set of messages be an > > error. Old behaviour can be got through `sortm all' or a new > > option that folks can put in ~/.mh_profile if they're happy > > with it as it was. > > I agree. I don't see a need for that new option. > > This should do it, along with updates to the man page > and test suite:
...umm, and updates to all the things that wrap around sortm, too? I thought the mh cli was/should be pretty much set in stone. steve -- _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
