Re: nmh 1.8RC2, xlbiff, and $HOME

I also use xlbiff and would like it to continue working without needing to fuss with it. The next best option for me is that I might be required to set some environment variables in a sane way that doesn't cascade into the operation of other programs. Thanks for uncovering this release client

Re: nmh 1.8?

Is anyone here packaging nmh as part of a .deb file in the process of testing? I used to routinely do that for .rpm packages, but no longer find myself on a system where that makes sense. Thanks. On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 3:48 PM David Levine wrote: > Greetings as we approach the new year. > >

Re: New release?

I'll try to test it. Kevin On Sun, Mar 21, 2021, 7:04 PM David Levine wrote: > Ken wrote: > > > But anyway ... what do people think about doing a new release of nmh? > > It's been 3 years, so yeah, we should. > > David > >

Re: Synchronization Problem

Hi Norman, I've used fetchmail, and didn't need to resort to what you're doing. Here's the gist of my fetchmailrc (without indentation) set logfile /var/log/fetchmail set daemon 300 set postmaster "windomain/kevin" poll lookout.comp(without indentation)anyname.com protocol IMAP: folder INBOX;

Re: Sort and delete duplcate messages

I wonder if these old [n]mh FAQ things would help? I remember using mhfinddup a LONG time ago. https://www.mhonarc.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2008-09/msg4.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2008-09/msg1.html https://github.com/dscho/nmh/blob/master/docs/FAQ On Mon,

Re: [nmh-workers] vixie out

On 29 September 2019 at 17:20, Paul Vixie wrote: > folks, it's been a blast. i used MH from 1985 to 2005 exclusively, then > from 2005 to 2015 in parallel with uw-imapd, and not at all since mark > crispen's death when i moved to dovecot and Maildir. > > i've helped find and fix bugs in the

Re: [nmh-workers] Construction of outgoing from line

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:13 PM Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > > Sorry for the top post (using gmail atm) > > It's been years for me. Doesn't it let one edit the quoted email? :-) > I looked it up, and maybe this reply will work > > Re: mailx, it passes the message to postfix which

Re: [nmh-workers] Construction of outgoing from line

Sorry for the top post (using gmail atm) Thanks for the suggestion to look at mh-format(5). I'll do that. Re: mailx, it passes the message to postfix which then takes care of the outgoing email form. Kevin On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:21 AM Ken Hornstein wrote: > >I'm trying to get my

[nmh-workers] Construction of outgoing from line

Hi folks, I'm trying to get my outgoing email to be u...@mydomain.tld again (I had a machine crash). On the crashed machine it worked fine with the following atop my components file %<(void(localmbox))%>%(void(width))%(putaddr From: ) Mail sent from the new machine, which I'm trying to

Re: [nmh-workers] persistent nmh welcome

Hi Leonardo, On 31 August 2018 at 1:03, Leonardo Taccari wrote: > Hello Kevin, > > Kevin Cosgrove writes: > > [...] > > The following persists in presenting itself with each new login the > > first time I run an nmh command, e.g. 'scan' is the one that gene

[nmh-workers] Test

I think my incoming email is work now. Just testing. -- Kevin -- nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Re: [nmh-workers] Email VERY slow (about 20 hour delay) leaving google mail server(s)

On 25 August 2018 at 9:29, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > > What trouble is the nmh-workers list seeing with regard to my email > > address? > > As an example, Mailman saw a bounce in trying to send your subscription > a copy of your email to the list. :-) > > This is a Mailman

Re: [nmh-workers] Email VERY slow (about 20 hour delay) leaving google mail server(s)

On 25 August 2018 at 9:29, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > > What trouble is the nmh-workers list seeing with regard to my email > > address? > > As an example, Mailman saw a bounce in trying to send your subscription > a copy of your email to the list. :-) [snip] Thanks Ralph!

Re: [nmh-workers] Email VERY slow (about 20 hour delay) leaving google mail server(s)

On 23 August 2018 at 23:17, Ralph Corderoy via Gmail Help Forum wrote: > Hi Kevin, > If you're the same Kevin Cosgrove that's subscribed to the nmh-workers > mailing list, then you might like to know that's recently having trouble > sending to your subscribed address, and perhaps th

Re: [nmh-workers] Unnecessary dependency on vi???

On 11 March 2018 at 14:19, David Levine wrote: > Jon wrote: > > > Things always get weird as one's installed distribution gets crusty. > > My Fedora Core 27 installation recently started whining about conflicts > > between nmh and vi. Surprised me. > > Here's why: > > 1)

Re: [Nmh-workers] Announcing the second release candidate of nmh 1.7.1

This candidate builds, checks, and packages fine for me. Thanks folks! On 22 January 2018 at 14:20, Ken Hornstein wrote: > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second release candidate > for nmh 1.7.1 -- Kevin -- Nmh-workers

Re: [Nmh-workers] Hopefully last call for 1.7

On 28 October 2017 at 10:59, Ken Hornstein <k...@pobox.com> wrote: > I looked through my email and the mailing list archives, and I am not > sure there are any 1.7 blockers from the last release candidate (RC3). > Well, okay, there was one issue reported by Kevin Cosgrove that AF

Re: [Nmh-workers] Package Spec. Suggestions.

On 28 October 2017 at 1:10, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > I'm tinkering with SPECS/nmh.spec and SPECS/nmh.cygport, in particular > removing the statement a GUI is required if nmh is to be used as one's > main MUA. :-) > [snip] > > So of the four {Cygwin,Fedora}/{xmh,exmh}, is

Re: [Nmh-workers] IMAP/nmh, again

On 26 October 2017 at 14:22, Ken Hornstein wrote: > So, the most recent discussion about IMAP started me thinking ... how > bad would a connection for every command really be? [Much good info trimmed] The imaptest is a really good step. Yay! Thanks Ken. -- Kevin

Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3

On 26 August 2017 at 11:28, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > > - To: recipi...@example.com > > - From: sen...@example.com > > - Subject: mhfixmsg pass through on parse error > > - MIME-Version: 1.0 > > - Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="- =_aa0"

Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3

On 26 August 2017 at 1:11, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >Now I get only these errors, only one of which is free of the xhost > >issue. > > > >FAIL: test/mhfixmsg/test-mhfixmsg > > The others are likely due to a xhost in your .cshrc/.tcshrc, so I think > we can ignore them for now.

Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3

On 25 August 2017 at 23:34, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >Thanks for mentioning mts.conf I find this > > > >localname: cosgroves.us > > > >There. Maybe redundant with my main.cf from postfix? > > Well, probably not since that affects what nmh thinks as the local name > which

Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3

On 25 August 2017 at 20:34, Ken Hornstein wrote: > > + localuser:kevinc being removed from access control list > > I dug into this a bit more. What is your SHELL? Specifically, what > is the "SHELL" environment variable set to? > > Boy, I just took a look at whatnowsbr.c,

Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3

On 25 August 2017 at 19:24, David Levine wrote: > Kevin wrote: > > > ./test/format/test-myhost: local hostname test expected: > > 'drums.cosgroves.us' > > but instead got: > > 'cosgroves.us' > > FAIL: test/format/test-myhost > > That might be an /etc/hosts

Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3

On 25 August 2017 at 19:15, Ken Hornstein wrote: > > + localuser:kevinc being removed from access control list > > > >That's coming from my 'xhost -SI:localuser:kevinc' setting which > >I use exclusively to keep exmh happy. Ironic. > > I think Ralph has hit that one the head.

Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3

On 25 August 2017 at 23:42, Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Thanks for trying RC3. > > > In some of the failures are lines like these in the diff's > > > > + localuser:kevinc being removed from access control list > > > > That's coming from my 'xhost

Re: [Nmh-workers] Call for testing of nmh 1.7 release candidate 3

On 24 August 2017 at 21:32, Ken Hornstein wrote: > I am feeling reasonably confident about the quality of nmh 1.7 release > candidate 3. To that end, I sure would appreciate it if you had not had > a chance yet to test any nmh 1.7 release candidates, that you give RC3 a > try.

Re: [Nmh-workers] New release, v2?

On 9 March 2016 at 9:17, Ken Hornstein wrote: > So, in short: cut a 1.7, yes or no? Anything people would like in there? > My list is: > > - Incorporate XOAUTH support > - Fix character conversion on message bodies (right now it aborts if it > cannot convert characters to

Re: [Nmh-workers] Maybe time for a new release?

On 8 March 2016 at 19:25, Ken Hornstein wrote: > What do people think of [Ken's] idea [to gather appropriate > changes since the last release for a "1.7" release, followed > by a MIME refactoring project]? If you like this idea, is > there anything else you want fixed before a

Re: [Nmh-workers] (n)mh tip of the day

On 20 October 2015 at 13:56, Ken Hornstein wrote: > I just came up with this, and I thought it might be useful to people. > > I put in my components file the following line: > > %<{from}%?(getenv MH_FROM)%|%(void(localmbox))%>%(void(width))%(putaddr From: > ) > > That lets

[Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address

Hi folks, Should an email address of this form From: first.last produce an error like this: repl: bad addresses: first.last -- no at-sign after local-part (<) My relevant ~/.mh_profile content is: formatproc: replyfilter repl: -annotate

Re: [Nmh-workers] repl doesn't like return address

On 31 August 2015 at 13:10, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >I run into this at work, primarily from a co-worker running Mutt. While I > >pointed out that this is not valid and pointed to the spec, he has not > >fixed it as it does not break for anyone else. > > > >How hard would it be

Re: [Nmh-workers] mts.conf has me Baffled.

On 21 July 2015 at 15:11, Martin G. McCormick mar...@server1.shellworld.net wrote: I am still trying to get the programs in nmh that talk to the mail transport agent to send the message to msmtp so I set the following lines in /etc/nmh/mts.conf: mts: sendmail sendmail:

Re: [Nmh-workers] Sending Email with a huge attachment

On 2 June 2015 at 13:53, Jerrad Pierce belg4...@pthbb.org wrote: SMTP is not meant as a Netflix replacement Norm X-P At that size, even if your local server accepts the message, some hop along the way will almost certainly croak. If you cannot find a web or FTP server to host the file,

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh with mobile devices [was: Re: replyfilter trouble with messages from XFINITY Connect Mobile App]

Hi folks, I thought I'd follow up on my look into using nmh via my Android phone. I ended up installing Serverauditor https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.server.auditor.ssh.clienthl=en That was easier to use than JuiceSSH, at least for me. My LG G3 screen is big enough that I can

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh with mobile devices [was: Re: replyfilter trouble with messages from XFINITY Connect Mobile App]

On 24 March 2015 at 15:16, Christian Neukirchen chneukirc...@gmail.com wrote: Andy Bradford amb-x...@bradfords.org writes: Thus said Kevin Cosgrove on Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:33:26 -0700: I see slow downs when running exmh over DSL and scanning a large folder. I'm not sure why

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh with mobile devices [was: Re: replyfilter trouble with messages from XFINITY Connect Mobile App]

On 17 March 2015 at 13:45, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: Ah yes, IMAP raises its head again. I wouldn't trust me to code anything in nmh. But, I can test things and report results, should this ever get off the ground. Well, I once suggested we should either write a backend for

Re: [Nmh-workers] replyfilter trouble with messages from XFINITY Connect Mobile App

On 17 March 2015 at 11:05, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: When instead it should have really been $htmlconv[0]. So you need to install w3m? Or change @htmlconv. I installed w3m and replyfilter succeeds. Great! I've fixed that on master. Wow. If all software could be fixed

Re: [Nmh-workers] replyfilter trouble with messages from XFINITY Connect Mobile App

On 16 March 2015 at 23:32, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: In my OP I left out the fact that I have par installed, AND replyfilter works on all of my email replies except for those from the XFINITY mobile app. Whoops, that's a bug in replyfilter; specifically, the error message is:

Re: [Nmh-workers] replyfilter trouble with messages from XFINITY Connect Mobile App

On 17 March 2015 at 11:28, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: Well I had a free moment and I wanted to take care of it before I forgot. And it was easy. Other stuff ... has been lingering. I wish we could do that for everything, but we all have to put food on the table. I'm glad the

Re: [Nmh-workers] replyfilter trouble with messages from XFINITY Connect Mobile App

On 16 March 2015 at 22:59, David Levine levin...@acm.org wrote: Kevin wrote: I get this message from the contributed replyfilter script Unable to exec par: No such file or directory HTML converter process exited with 2 You'll need to install par. It's available for some Linux

[Nmh-workers] replyfilter trouble with messages from XFINITY Connect Mobile App

Hi folks, I get this message from the contributed replyfilter script Unable to exec par: No such file or directory HTML converter process exited with 2 When I try to reply to a message containing === Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 23:22:44 + (UTC) From:

Re: [Nmh-workers] Redoing argument processing

On 17 January 2013 at 15:37, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: Last year there was a discussion on nmh-workers about why you can't have a moreproc like less -f. See the thread here: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2012-05/msg00140.html After some discussion, I think

Re: [Nmh-workers] rmmproc Not Used for Lots of Messages; refile Copies.

On 26 November 2012 at 16:42, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Sun, 25 Nov 2012 09:55:42 -0600, David Levine said: Ken wrote: I'm personally willing to write code to make it so if rmmproc exceeds MAXARGS it will run rmmproc multiple times. Or bail out and let the user do that

Re: [Nmh-workers] pick(1) decode RFC-2047 headers?

On 24 November 2012 at 9:52, Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com wrote: Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com writes: Ralph pointed out earlier that with the proliferation of RFC 2047-encoded headers, pick is much less useful. I'm wondering ... would it make sense to simply have pick run the RFC 2047

Re: [Nmh-workers] does dist work?

On 23 November 2012 at 10:34, Bill Wohler woh...@newt.com wrote: Jeffrey Honig j...@honig.net writes: I use dist (via mh-e) all the time to add people who were not Cc'd.  Confuses the hell out of Outlook and Thunderbird users.  That's part of the charm. I use dist in MH-E all the time

[Nmh-workers] mh-v

On 29 October 2012 at 20:17, ra...@hep.wisc.edu wrote: i think an ssh + mh-v on a laptop is a decent replacement for Exmh. mh-v ??? MH-V - an exmh-like interface for MH/nmh mail with GTK+ colors and Vim key bindings [written in perl using perl-Curses] Yes, it's mysterious.

Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?

On 5 November 2012 at 19:24, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: The question isn't if the comm link breaks, but if you control-C or kill -9 the sucker because you just did this: [~] folder +linux-kernel linux-kernel+ has 185962 messages (5-205596); cur=203756. [~] scan oh fudge I run

Re: [Nmh-workers] colorized/highlighted scan output?

On 2 November 2012 at 14:40, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: For me ... I'd prefer to not do the display sugar right now. I just don't like the idea of putting knowledge of JUST ANSI escape sequences directly into nmh; that seems wrong. Making it possible for users to use them, fine.

[Nmh-workers] SPAM??? [was: [exmh-users] Email access while traveling?]

It looks like someone harvested email addresses from the list and I'm getting a LOT of spam containing my original subject line. Anyone else see this too? Sigh -- Kevin ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-users] Email access while traveling?

On 30 October 2012 at 9:25, Dale Alspach alsp...@math.okstate.edu wrote: When the [ConnectBot] conection is open, click the settings button on the phone. Force size is on the menu. This works on Droid 3 and 4 and I assume is similar on other android phones. Found it. Having that

Re: [Nmh-workers] Email access while traveling?

On 24 October 2012 at 7:56, ra...@hep.wisc.edu wrote: i think an ssh + mh-v on a laptop is a decent replacement for Exmh. mh-v ??? someday i'll probably make ssh + mh-v work well on driod (won't take much work) but so far i've avoided owning/wanting a smart phone. It took me a long time

[Nmh-workers] Email access while traveling?

What do you all do to access your email while traveling? I just got an Android phone. I would like to be able to get at my email on my home server, stored in MH message files. I've used nmh and exmh for years. Access from remote locations requires SSH and X11, which means that I usually need

Re: [Nmh-workers] Email access while traveling?

On 23 October 2012 at 22:23, Oliver Kiddle okid...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Kevin wrote: What do you people do in such circumstances? I simply do ssh from my phone. I have a Nokia N900 which has a hardware keyboard and even comes with an xterm application. With Android, you should be able to

Re: [Nmh-workers] Email access while traveling?

On 23 October 2012 at 13:05, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote: On 2012-10-23, at 12:56 PM, Kevin Cosgrove wrote: I'd really prefer full operability between my phone and my home email. But, I don't know how to do that. What do you people do in such circumstances? About

Re: [Nmh-workers] Changing the default pager.

On 12 October 2012 at 16:20, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote: For ever and a day the code has hardwired in a default pager – typically the more command. This pre-dates, and ignores, the ${PAGER} convention. I would like to change this so that ${PAGER} takes precedence over the

Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged.

On 11 October 2012 at 10:35, Joel Uckelman uckel...@nomic.net wrote: Speaking for myself only: I can't recall a single time in 15 years of using nmh that I've wanted to use sortm to sort less than a complete folder. I have two use cases for sortm 1. sortm +folder 2. sortm -textfield

Re: [Nmh-workers] sortm's Default of all is Brain-Damaged.

On 11 October 2012 at 14:26, Paul Fox p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us wrote: kevin wrote: On 11 October 2012 at 10:35, Joel Uckelman uckel...@nomic.net wrote: Speaking for myself only: I can't recall a single time in 15 years of using nmh that I've wanted to use sortm to sort less

Re: [Nmh-workers] somewhat OT: re procmail or ??

On 12 September 2012 at 8:16, ra...@hep.wisc.edu wrote: I'm mostly interested in answering the question which folder did the recent msg FROM so-and-so@somewhere go into? Maybe the attached script is a useful way to answer that question after the fact? The script has other uses too, as it's

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH Work-arounds for Exchange server mangling(OT???)

On 29 August 2012 at 10:43, David Levine levin...@acm.org wrote: Kevin wrote: I chose only the .sh extension. Nmh picked the type and encoding. The message was sent as: Content-Type: application/x-sh Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Exchange left that alone. I verified

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH Work-arounds for Exchange server mangling(OT???)

On 29 August 2012 at 11:03, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I verified that Exchange doesn't mangle outgoing x-sh attachments. But it (V6.5) does mangle them when they're incoming. How odd. Even encoded as Base64? If that is the case, then that's damn unfriendly. Until I found .sh

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH Work-arounds for Exchange server mangling (OT???)

On 20 August 2012 at 14:04, David Levine levin...@acm.org wrote: Kevin wrote: [Ken:] - Maybe a Content-Type of application/octet-stream would work? I already tried a variation on that. I gave it a fake .exe extension, thinking that Exchange might look more favorably on it. No

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH Work-arounds for Exchange server mangling (OT???)

On 28 August 2012 at 12:27, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: For me .bin failed. Whereas .sh works just fine. Yippee!!! So, just for my curiosity ... what was the MIME type and Content-Transfer-Encoding that you ended up using? I chose only the .sh extension. Nmh picked the type and

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH Work-arounds for Exchange server mangling (OT???)

On 20 August 2012 at 12:38, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: So, some suggestions for you, in no particular order. - Maybe putting a Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit would help on your attachents? Unfortunately we can't specify the CTE in nmh (but it's something I always wanted to

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH Work-arounds for Exchange server mangling (OT???)

On 20 August 2012 at 12:38, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I was thinking that you really meant base 64 instead of uuencode ... until you mentioned shar files. My next thought was, People still use shar files?!??!. Should I send you a photo of me with my pet dinosaur? ;-) What can I

[Nmh-workers] NMH Work-arounds for Exchange server mangling (OT???)

Hi, I have to deal with email going through an Exchange server on a daily basis. A few months back that server started mangling email my email message content. I'm trying to use nmh to craft my emails such that Exchange won't mangle it. SOME BACKGROUND (skip to QUESTION, if you wish) The

[Nmh-workers] Replying to UTF-8 (and others?)

Hi, I'm trying to get just a little better result in crafting a reply draft message. I'm using Ken's very nice 'replyfilter' script and recipe, which formats nearly all of the body of the message perfectly. But, I still get a little cruft in the body, thus On 15 August 2012 at 15:36,

Re: [Nmh-workers] NMH Work-arounds for Exchange server mangling (OT???)

On 16 August 2012 at 12:55, Howard Bampton howard.bamp...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Kevin Cosgrove kev...@cosgroves.us wrote: Is there a better way to use mhn to unpack the attachments, converting DOS form back to UNIX form? I suppose I could write a shell

Re: [Nmh-workers] cruddy X-MH-Attach behavior

I decided to play with the mentioned feature. I found out that different paths through different servers have different results. In one direction x-unix-mode=0755 in the original message, as it appears in my fcc'd +outbox, gets converted to x-unix-mode=0600. In another direction the

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 has been released!

On 11 June 2012 at 0:42, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I am pleased to announce the release of nmh 1.5. It is available for download here: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/nmh/nmh-1.5.tar.gz 1.5 works great on my systems. That's no surprise as RC2 and RC3 worked

Re: [Nmh-workers] nmh 1.5 has been released!

On 11 June 2012 at 0:42, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I am pleased to announce the release of nmh 1.5. It is available for download here: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/nmh/nmh-1.5.tar.gz 21:49:26 ERROR 404: Not Found. ??? -- Kevin

Re: [Nmh-workers] 1.5RC3 no longer honors mts.conf localname setting for Message-ID?

On 5 June 2012 at 14:10, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: I notice that Message-IDs are now generated using LocalName(1), ie, it ignores any localname setting from mts.conf. Why is it working on my system? It wasn't set when I first installed the newest nmh. After setting it, the

[Nmh-workers] replyfilter

Hi, I've been using the combination of a replyfilter with the suggested mhl.repl.replyfilter and the entry of a referencing formatproc in ~/.mh_profile, and all is quite nice indeed. In fact I'm REALLY happy with nmh 1.5 RC? and exmh 2.8.0+RC? But, some of the time the 'par' call within the

Re: [Nmh-workers] replyfilter

On 31 May 2012 at 8:13, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I like par fine and I'm glad it has a man page ... but it's damn near incomprehensible. Yes, it reads more as a software specification than instructions for use. It reminds me of a Super Compact manual, with entries like: run

Re: [Nmh-workers] More than one parameters in .mh_profile

On 29 May 2012 at 8:00, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Tue, 29 May 2012 10:01:22 +0100, Ralph Corderoy said: No `#'? How about just always send to the user's shell from the password entry with a -c, as distinct from /bin/sh. The problem is that some people (at least in the Elder

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

Earlier I reported an issue with multiple messages ending up in the same mh message. We concluded, given that my spool file was messed up, that this couldn't be nmh. That part stands. I disabled my procmailrc file, and the problem went away. I've put back in all but two rules by now, and

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

Hi, I'm not sure whether this is my trouble, nmh, or exmh. But, I can't get it to work. One person I know sends me messages containing Disposition-Notification-To: John Smith john@smith exmh responds to that by displaying a message in the main window allowing me to Send confirmation, Send

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

nmh 1.5 RC2 builds and runs fine on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and 5.5. It's also been quite solid on Mandriva 2007.0 for the last few days. HTH -- Kevin ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

On 6 May 2012 at 14:23, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I am pleased to announce to second release candidate (RC2) of nmh 1.5 is now available. You can find it for download here: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/nmh/nmh-1.5-RC2.tar.gz I'm building and packaging this.

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

May 2012 12:16:13 -0400 Message-ID: 201205071616.q47ggaok026...@iron.comsol.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 09:16:11 -0700 To: Kevin Cosgrove j...@junk.us From: Jiahe (Jan) Wang mail-comsol...@comsol.com Reply-To: Jiahe (Jan) Wang j...@junk.com Subject: Webinar: Simulating Smart Materials

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

On 7 May 2012 at 13:57, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.comwrote: I'm having a serious problem with 1.5 RC2. I'm using nmh 1.5 RC2 with exmh 2.8.0 + CVS through May 2, 2012. My MTA is postfix 2.3.6. From looking at the message you provided ... I see no From header seperating the messages. Nor

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-users] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

On 7 May 2012 at 7:57, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.comwrote: That POP reference and 'man inc' helped me find the problem. I have MAILHOST defined in my environment. nmh now interprets MAILHOST as a POP host and wants to login. Undefining MAILHOST got rid of my last nmh 1.5 RC2 issue. Huh, I

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh1.5 is now available

On 7 May 2012 at 9:49, David Levine levin...@acm.orgwrote: I'm building and packaging this. This part of the 'make install' chgrp mail /buildroot/nmh-1.5-1kc_0tek_RC2_fc16.x86_64/usr/bin/inc \ chmod 2755 /buildroot/nmh-1.5-1kc_0tek_RC2_fc16.x86_64/usr/bin/inc; \ requires the

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

On 7 May 2012 at 14:16, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.comwrote: Does the spool file contain them? I found one email in the spool just now where a LinkedIn email doesn't start with a From line. One of the post-inc emails that was concatenated also had trailing LinkedIn content. The other

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

On 7 May 2012 at 19:58, Ralph Corderoy ra...@inputplus.co.ukwrote: Hi Kevin, Ken wrote: Kevin wrote: Impossible for me to tell after the 'inc' as the spool file is empty. When my email notifier (xlbiff*) pops up I'll have a look at the spool prior to 'inc'. Perhaps you could

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

On 7 May 2012 at 12:52, Kevin Cosgrove kev...@cosgroves.uswrote: On 7 May 2012 at 14:16, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.comwrote: Does the spool file contain them? I found one email in the spool just now where a LinkedIn email doesn't start with a From line. One of the post-inc emails

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

On 6 May 2012 at 14:23, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I am pleased to announce to second release candidate (RC2) of nmh 1.5 is now available. You can find it for download here: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/nmh/nmh-1.5-RC2.tar.gz Changes from RC1 include

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

On 6 May 2012 at 14:23, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.com wrote: I am pleased to announce to second release candidate (RC2) of nmh 1.5 is now available. You can find it for download here: http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases/nmh/nmh-1.5-RC2.tar.gz On Mandriva 2007.0 I gett these

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-users] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

On 6 May 2012 at 20:19, Ken Hornstein k...@pobox.comwrote: But, once I get around the installation issue, why does 'inc' need special group ownership and SGID treatment? Would that reason be related to the 'inc' in Fedora's build of nmh-1.4 asking me for a password when I want to 'inc' my

Re: [Nmh-workers] [exmh-workers] Second release candidate for nmh 1.5 is now available

After a day of hacking on my email system is looks like exmh CVS-2012-05-02 and nmh-1.5-RC2 have installed and are working on three of my systems. Nice. Thanks! -- Kevin ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org