Michael,
> Wow. Please share :-)
presumably, you didn't really mean it (thus the :-).
but, here they are anyway, in the format i keep them (a makefile puts
them in ~/Mail/mhl.headers).
cheers, Greg
; 1 these are all the fields i want to ignore when displaying a message.
; 2 automatically
Greg Minshall wrote:
> fwiw, i'm up to 732 ignored components. but, i'm happy adding them as
Wow. Please share :-)
> needed -- always the optimist that some day, some vital, otherwise
> un-acknowledged, header will show up in an e-mail i am viewing.
I feel the same way.
On Sun, 06 Jun 2021 10:22:38 -0700 Jon Steinhart sez:
> Ken Hornstein writes:
> > >Out of curiosity, then what is the value of "extras?" Was there
> > >a time it provided value, before header content exploded?
> >
> > Well, I don't mean to crap on anyone, Robert Elz in particular, but
> > you
George Michaelson writes:
> I do occasionally look at X-List-Archive: to get a url for the thread, to
> pass to other people. Thats the only novel header I view and I can do that
> with the file path from mhpath and grep when I need it.
>
> G
I have an alias that cats the current message in case
Hi George,
> I do occasionally look at X-List-Archive: to get a url for the thread,
> to pass to other people. Thats the only novel header I view and I can
> do that with the file path from mhpath and grep when I need it.
That seems the simplest way. However,
$ anno -list -component
I do occasionally look at X-List-Archive: to get a url for the thread, to
pass to other people. Thats the only novel header I view and I can do that
with the file path from mhpath and grep when I need it.
G
Date:Sun, 06 Jun 2021 12:29:15 -0400
From:Ken Hornstein
Message-ID: <20210606162916.bb968d5...@pb-smtp2.pobox.com>
| But I think Robert comes from an era BEFORE everyone started cramming
| non user-readable metadata into email headers.
That I did. Back then
fwiw, i'm up to 732 ignored components. but, i'm happy adding them as
needed -- always the optimist that some day, some vital, otherwise
un-acknowledged, header will show up in an e-mail i am viewing.
cheers, Greg
Ken Hornstein writes:
> >Out of curiosity, then what is the value of "extras?" Was there
> >a time it provided value, before header content exploded?
>
> Well, I don't mean to crap on anyone, Robert Elz in particular, but
> you can kind of see what I would call the original MH thinking here:
>
>
>Out of curiosity, then what is the value of "extras?" Was there
>a time it provided value, before header content exploded?
Well, I don't mean to crap on anyone, Robert Elz in particular, but
you can kind of see what I would call the original MH thinking here:
On Sat, 05 Jun 2021 19:35:40 -0400 Ken Hornstein sez:
> >> Brilliant idea! I too would use an inverse match logic. Shorter rules,
> >> easier to apply, probably faster.
> >>
> >> G
> >
> >I guess that I should interpret that as no, there isn't such an incantation
> >but since I brought it up
Ken Hornstein writes:
> >> Brilliant idea! I too would use an inverse match logic. Shorter rules,
> >> easier to apply, probably faster.
> >>
> >> G
> >
> >I guess that I should interpret that as no, there isn't such an incantation
> >but since I brought it up then it's my job to write the code so
Hi
[2021-06-05 15:16] Jon Steinhart
> Is there any incantation for "show only the headers explicitly listed
> in mhl.format" so that new and uninteresting headers from everybody's
> latest spam filter, mailing list manager, and internal tracking don't
> fill the screen.
You can remove the
>> Brilliant idea! I too would use an inverse match logic. Shorter rules,
>> easier to apply, probably faster.
>>
>> G
>
>I guess that I should interpret that as no, there isn't such an incantation
>but since I brought it up then it's my job to write the code so I will when
>I get a chance.
You
George Michaelson writes:
>
> Brilliant idea! I too would use an inverse match logic. Shorter rules,
> easier to apply, probably faster.
>
> G
I guess that I should interpret that as no, there isn't such an incantation
but since I brought it up then it's my job to write the code so I will when
I
Brilliant idea! I too would use an inverse match logic. Shorter rules,
easier to apply, probably faster.
G
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021, 8:17 am Jon Steinhart, wrote:
> I've been getting increasingly annoyed at the number of header lines
> that fill a screen or two before I can even see message
I've been getting increasingly annoyed at the number of header lines
that fill a screen or two before I can even see message contents. I
keep adding to an already huge ignores line in my mhl.format but new
headers seem to be created daily.
Is there any incantation for "show only the headers
17 matches
Mail list logo
