Re: mts code reorganization

2000-09-08 Thread Dan Harkless
Shantonu Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Looking at the ChangeLog, I see you also fixed the date-parsing bugs in your new dtimep.lex. Were military time zones supported in the old dtimep.lex? Did they cause a problem there? If not, why not? [Just want to make sure removing military time

Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences]

2000-09-08 Thread Dan Harkless
Shantonu Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How do IMAP's subfolders differs from nmh's, e.g. `refile +inbox/tasks'. Or are you just saying nmh's IMAP support would include IMAP's subfolders? I'm saying we have lots of options: IMAP folder on Local nmh host mail.foo.com folder

Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences]

2000-09-08 Thread John Reinhagen
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], also sprach Iain MacDonnell: Jerry Peek writes: : On 8 September 2000 at 20:05, Iain MacDonnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : I'm just saying that an : IMAP imeplementation could ignore sequences except for "unseen". : : I haven't thought a lot about internals