Re: [Fwd: Re: Questions about IMAP and sequences]

[Dan Harkless]

Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How do IMAP's subfolders differs from nmh's, e.g. `refile
> > +inbox/tasks'.  Or are you just saying nmh's IMAP support would include
> > IMAP's subfolders?
> 
> I'm saying we have lots of options:
> 
>  IMAP folder on     Local nmh
> host mail.foo.com     folder
> -----------------   ---------
> work/               ~/Mail/IMAP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ with `work' sequence
> work/               ~/Mail/IMAP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/work
> 
> work/junk           ~/Mail/IMAP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ with `work/junk' sequence
> work/junk           ~/Mail/IMAP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/work with `junk' sequence
> work/junk           ~/Mail/IMAP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/work/junk
> 
> So, do IMAP folders and subfolders map directly to nmh folders,
> or do we use an alternate scheme, as was earlier suggested with
> sequences?

Seems like a one-to-one mapping would be the most natural, the easiest to
implement, etc., no?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless                   | To prevent SPAM contamination, please 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW.  Thank you.