Here's some amusing reading for those in the audience who believe
that P2P in general, and BitTorrent in particular, are only used for
illicit purposes by music and film pirates:
http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/faq.php?e=4
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Yeah, yeah, I know, The ability to encrypt data is insignificant
next to the power of ISP Force ...
Well Darth, uh, I mean Nick, it's not a matter a faith, it's
a matter of cause and effect and war without end.
Sure, ISPs and their cohorts could choose to deploy ever more
invasive
Greetings. Definitely do read the article referenced below.
Particularly interesting is how ATT attempts to simultaneously
claim the moral high ground when it comes to filtering (even
invoking child porn examples, as predicted) while simultaneously
making it clear that economic issues are their
U2's manager yesterday called on artists to join him in forcing the
hippy technology and internet executives he blames for the
collapse of the music industry to help save it.
http://music.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,2248544,00.html
I seriously needed a laugh today. Thanks Paul!
--Lauren--
http://www.telegram.com/article/20080213/APF/802130714
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
--- Forwarded message begins ---
NEWS RELEASE
CEI Files Comments on Net Neutrality
Contact:
Richard Morrison, 202.331.2273
CEI Files Comments on Net Neutrality
Urges FCC to Let Network Practices Evolve in the Market
Washington, D.C., February 13, 2008—Today the Competitive Enterprise
This story hasn't seen much mainstream media play yet. Apparently
the means chosen by Pakistan's ISPs to conform to their government's
attempt to block their people's access to religiously offensive
video materials -- low level routing changes -- managed to disrupt
YouTube access worldwide over
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:23:28 -0800
Subject: [IP] Two positions at FCC Comcast Hearing
From: Brad Templeton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 6:50 PM
To: David Farber
Cc: ip
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] the FCC and Comcast - a query from your editor
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:35:28 -0500
I have heard endless suggestions that the FCC stop what many consider
improper network management practices by Comcast .. As a
The fact that states (or countries) assert that they have such long
arm rights is a whole world away from being able to enforce them.
Even within the U.S., such enforcement is often highly problematic,
internationally much more so.
Obviously if we're going to operate on the basis that everything
Pretty much speaks for itself:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/25/phorm_isp_advertising/
As the old song said, How low, can you go? As far as I'm
concerned, ISPs should never engage in such transfers of information
except perhaps on an explicit OPT-IN basis. The article notes that
no
over outside services, but that's another story.
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
- - -
At 10:48 PM 2/28/2008, Lauren Weinstein wrote:
Brett Glass says: Sixth, there should be no obfuscation of P2P.
B! Sorry, no can do, at least if we're talking about some sort
of enforced ban. I'm
Just as a point of interest, there are readers of this list in some
parts of the world who are laughing themselves silly at some of the
arguments we see here.
Why? Because they realize that if there was broad competition in
the Internet access industry in the U.S., especially if wholesale and
it seems like this illustrates the future of
the network business and is at the root of the network neutrality
issue.
-Benson
On 2/29/08, Lauren Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just as a point of interest, there are readers of this list in some
parts of the world who are laughing
and
the disadvantage of competitors and customers.
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
- - -
On Mar 5, 2008, at 5:53 PM, Lauren Weinstein wrote:
Question: Would this problem be mitigated if all IP-based traffic,
other perhaps than basic not-on-demand, non-PPV TV, were subject to
the same
Let's get past the airline bomb analogy. A bomb's sole purpose is
to destroy and terrorize, and whatever damage is done by P2P is
ancillary to P2P's purpose, not P2P's purpose itself. When someone
triggers a purposeful DDoS attack, that's damage for damage's sake.
But Brett's concern about VoIP
Greetings. If any dyndns users receive NNSquad messages
successfully (perhaps via aliases) I'd appreciate it if you'd ask
their postmaster (assuming they have one, see below) to contact me.
Mail to dyndns users on the NNSquad mailing list appears to be
failing with MX looping errors, and it's
NY Times: Concerns over video traffic and Internet capacities
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/13/technology/13net.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
NY Times: Verizon offers system to improve P2P transfers
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-P2P-Verizon.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
OK, we need to get to the bottom of this. Last I heard, Verizon
allowed subscribers to opt-out of their DNS redirection service
through the rather cumbersome technique of manually changing
client DNS settings. Can we confirm that this is no longer the
case, and that regardless of client DNS
farther in the wrong direction. If ISPs wish to provide such DNS
diversion services, they should be *opt-in* only. But we all know
why they don't do that.
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
--- Forwarded Message
From: Kelly Setzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lauren Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
be *opt-in* only. But we all know
why they don't do that.
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
--- Forwarded Message
From: Kelly Setzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lauren Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ NNSquad ] DNS Interception by ISPs (was Verizon P2P
discussion)
Date: Fri, 14 Mar
Well, responses continue to arrive from my query regarding DNS
redirection/diversion experiences. Frankly, I'm receiving enough
conflicting data at this point regarding non-standard DNS behavior
(for TW, Verizon, and now HughesNet) that really definitive
statements regarding any of these will
A quick additional note:
If you choose to try the DNS Diversion Test described in:
http://www.nnsquad.org/archives/nnsquad/msg00735.html
it would be best to do some ordinary (UDP) DNS lookups, e.g.:
dig @dns-test.nnsquad.org control.hq
as well as the zone lookup example that I showed
Greetings. Just FYI, I'm already getting messages from people
finding what appear to be unexpected DNS diversions from their
ISPs. There is enough broad interest in this that I'm going to
write up a more comprehensive set of instructions for this
testing suitable for broader distribution, along
Greetings. You can now find the expected output data for the NNSquad
control.hq DNS test zone (control.hq at DNS server
dns-test.nnsquad.org) via:
http://www.nnsquad.org/dns-test-zone-output.txt
This data will be changing at intervals so please always verify
any test results against the
Greetings. Early test results via the NNSquad test DNS zone are
strongly suggesting that HughesNet is intercepting and diverting
ordinary (UDP) DNS queries at the port 53 level. AXFR (TCP) queries
do not appear to be similarly affected at this time.
Dig tests set to the dns-test.nnsquad.org DNS
explanations are
omitted here. Please see the complete write-up at:
http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000377.html
Thanks! ]
--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
http://www.pfir.org/lauren
Co-Founder, PFIR
- People For Internet
I have a solid report that strongly suggests port 53 DNS diversion by
Sprint EVDO, at least through one reseller. I'd be particularly
interested in the results of other Sprint EVDO users running the
tests outlined in:
http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000377.html
Please do not report if the
BT admits using live customer data in Phorm test, faces legal act
http://www.precisionmarketing.co.uk/Articles/256233/BT+facing+legal+action+over+customer+data+.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
--- Forwarded Message
Subject: [IP] The FCC has released their High-Speed Internet Status report
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 07:23:13 -0400
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dewayne Hendricks)
Date: March 20, 2008
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:52:48 -0700
Subject: [IP] Music industry proposes a piracy surcharge on ISPs
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:37:54 -0700
Subject: [IP] Paper: State of the Internet Challenges ahead
From: Steve Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20,
Verizon and ATT top the spectrum auction
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/technology/21auction.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Allow me to channel Bob Keeshan for a few minutes. How might
Captain Kangaroo have explained the file sharing controversy?
Setting aside the technical details and application specifics, what
P2P really is of course is ... sharing. Sharing is good. Though if
you share something that you do not
Now we're really getting somewhere. We've managed to boil the entire
vast controversy over P2P down to a simple choice:
Captain Kangaroo on File Sharing
or
Mr. Rogers on Externalities
Place your bets! Take your pick!
As we've seen this political season, there's nothing like
AP: HD videoconferencing over the Internet
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Home-Videoconferencing.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Hmmm. Did Brett really supplement his usual categorical All P2P
traffic is thievery and has no right to exist! argument with a
well... if it's *slow* enough it might be OK appendix?
But do we believe there's a function that will accurately graph
morality vs. bps?
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Greetings. I've alluded previously to the upcoming initial beta
release of an NNSquad software package. Here's a bit more info.
The package is called the NNSquad Network Measurement Agent (NNMA).
The first beta release is an installable Windows application, and
the initial NNSquad-related
A LiveCD ISO for testing ISP interference:
http://www.p2pforum.it/forum/showthread.php?t=290321
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Here are a couple of links pointing off in numerous directions on
the Bell Canada throttling and reactions. I would appreciate
additional *specific* technical information on this issue
directly from affected parties if possible. Thanks.
AP's take on the Comcast treating all traffic equally story
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/technology/AP-Comcast-BitTorrent.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Greetings. Just in case anyone was wondering, the notable (and one
might suggest, somewhat relaxing) lack of messages on this list over
the last couple of days is not the result of technical problems or
rejected messages, but rather a sudden dearth of submissions.
My own sense is that after the
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:07:13 -0700
Subject: [IP] BBC iPlayer risks overloading the internet
From: Brian Randell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:49:24 -0700
Subject: [IP] Merccurynews report on Stanford hearing
From: Richard Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 5:45
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:45:42 -0700
Subject: [IP] Re:George Ford is getting booed and heckled
From: Brett Glass [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:54:17 -0700
Subject: [IP] Merccurynews report on Stanford hearing
From: David P. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 10:15
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:42:01 -0700
Subject: [IP] FCC En Banc Hearing at Stanford
From: Dr Heather E Hudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 1:37 PM
ATT: Bandwidth-wise, the sky is falling!
http://www.news.com/2100-1034_3-6237715.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Register: Network Neutrality as Mob Rule
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/23/bellovin_neutrality_mob_rule/
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080428-att-to-vuze-your-tcp-reset-test-proves-nothing.html
- - -
It is most certainly true that raw counts of TCP RSTs do not in and
of themselves demonstrate ISP traffic management techniques. On
the other hand, RST counts are still one useful metric
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] net filtering in Japan
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 19:57:28 -0400
Begin forwarded message:
From: Rod Van Meter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 8, 2008 7:31:44 PM EDT
To: David Farber [EMAIL
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] re-distribution of op-ed on Net Neutrality -- a reaction and
a reply from one of the authors
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 15:23:10 -0400
From: John S. Quarterman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Farber
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] Deep packet inspection at 80 Gbps
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 20:52:10 -0400
Begin forwarded message:
From: Roger Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 12, 2008 7:48:39 PM EDT
To: David Farber
Netflix announces their Internet set top box streaming movie service
This is of course in direct competition with ISP PPV movie offerings,
but unlike ISP-provided content, *will* count against the bandwidth
caps and limits determined by the ISPs themselves.
Not exactly a surprise.
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] Charter tracks user activity even if users opt out
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 08:08:08 -0400
Begin forwarded message:
From: Rich Kulawiec
Theories of legal liabilities for ISP content filtering, etc.
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/05/isp-content-f-1.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Cable prices keep rising -- subscribers keep paying
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/24/technology/24cable.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
for more details.
Good luck, Mr. Phelps.
--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
http://www.pfir.org/lauren
Co-Founder, PFIR
- People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
Co-Founder, NNSquad
- Network Neutrality Squad - http
[ The court clerk will now read the 19 million counts against
the defendant ...
-- Lauren Weinstein
NNSquad Moderator ]
--- Forwarded Message
From: Richard M. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: British Telecom Phorm PageSense External Validation
of the Internet will be next to
fall into the line-of-sight of their big red cutoff switch?
--Lauren--
Lauren Weinstein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800
http://www.pfir.org/lauren
Co-Founder, PFIR
- People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org
Co
--- Original Message ---
From: Hal Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6/12/08, 17:36:00
Subject: NPR Story on Charter
Privacy vs. Profit on the Internet
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91436209
The Internet service providers are talking about
NYT: Charging by the Byte to Curb Internet Traffic
The Time Warner plan has the potential to bring Internet use
full circle, back to the days when pay-as-you-go pricing held
back the Web's popularity. In the early days of dial-up access,
America Online and other providers
--- Forwarded Message
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:24:39 -0400
From: Art Brodsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lauren Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Free Press/Public Knowledge Investigation Finds NebuAd Wiretaps
Consumers and Hijacks Web Sites
Contact: Art Brodsky
202-518
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:01:32 -0700
Subject: [IP] IP traffic will nearly double every two years through 2012.
From: DV Henkel-Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
--- Forwarded Message
From: Richard M. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Gator comes back as NebuAd
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 10:32:09 -0400
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
- --=_NextPart_000_001E_01C8D38A.0FDABC40
Content-Type: text/plain;
This four minute video from PDF (Personal Democracy Forum) 2008 is
currently linked from CNN's home page as iReport.com: 'Father of
Internet' speaks out.
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-39113
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
InternetforEveryone.org is a national initiative of public
interest, civic and industry groups that are working to see that the
Internet continues to drive U.S. economic growth and prosperity.
http://internetforeveryone.org
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Charter suspends NebuAd pilot program (but wants a way to proceed)
http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/US-ISP-backs-off-from-NebuAd--/news/110997
http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/article.php/3755631/NebuAd+The+Third+Rail+for+ISPs.htm
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
ISPs operations?
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Lauren Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ISP is not your enemy. It is not your friend, either, but this
assumption that just about any active traffic management is somehow
bad, and that application-aware
AP: 'Public' online spaces don't carry speech, rights
http://kstp.com/article/stories/S501560.shtml?cat=159
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
L.A. Times: Cable and Telcos Band Together to Tighten Duopoly
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-lazarus13-2008jul13,0,7499799.column
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Greetings. David P. Reed (who is a founding signatory of NNSquad,
by the way) will be testifying tomorrow before the House
Subcommittee on Telecommunications and The Internet, at the hearing
on What Your Broadband Provider Knows About Your Web Use: Deep
Packet Inspection and Communications Laws
--- Forwarded Message
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:03:17 -0400
From: David P. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lauren Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DPI, NebuAd, etc.
I posted to my blog today a link to my written statement to the House
hearing on DPI.
http://www.reed.com/blog-dpr/?p=8
Are You Getting What You're Paying For?
25 Online Tools to Test Your Internet Service
http://www.internetservicedeals.com/blog/75/are-you-getting-what-youre-paying-for-25-online-tools-to-test-your-internet-service/
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
--- Forwarded Message
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:19:17 -0500
From: Seth Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Fwd: David Reed Delivers the Goods Again]
- Original Message
Subject: David Reed Delivers the Goods Again
Date:
Note that scheduled panel member Mark Cuban has famously urged
that P2P traffic simply be blocked:
http://lauren.vortex.com/archive/000329.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] Agenda for FCC's
NYTimes: FTC on Internet Privacy, ISPs, etc.
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/21/the-ftcs-bully-pulpit-on-privacy/index.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
ATT promises more precision in broadband service claims
http://uk.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUKN2146202820080721
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Comcast learns that services work better *after* cable is installed
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/22/AR2008072202685.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] Telcos hurting national interest says Vint Cerf - [IS NOT THE
ONLY FATHER -- when will PR people stop this djf ]Father of Internet
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:23:24 -0400
Begin forwarded
Embarq admits that they didn't directly warn users about NebuAd test
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/24/AR2008072403603.html?hpid=sec-tech
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Skype backdoor? And monitoring of subs in Europe ...
http://www.heise-online.co.uk/security/Speculation-over-back-door-in-Skype--/news/70
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
From:David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] Infrastructure
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Erik Cecil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 5:02 PM
To: David Farber
Subject: Infrastructure
Dave,
This might be of interest to the
From: Dave Burstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 6:10 AM
To: David Farber
Subject: Practical Congestion Solutions (Real Soon Now)
Folks
David Reed asked about how is Comcast managing traffic today, and what is
likely later in the year.
GOP Leader: FCC's Comcast Action is Dangerous, Limits Freedom!
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087sid=anHiuBmAa.JM
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] EFF Releases Switzerland ISP Testing Tool
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 12:06:48 -0400
EFF RELEASES SWITZERLAND ISP TESTING TOOL
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is releasing Switzerland, a
Propel Personal Bandwidth Manager
http://www.enterprisenetworkingplanet.com/netsysm/article.php/3732591
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 8:56 PM
To: David Farber; 'ip'
Cc: 'Dave Burstein'; 'Lauren Weinstein'
Subject: RE: [IP] That 5 gigabit cap is pulled back
Why is a byte cap on local traffic fair? What am I consuming and why shouldn't
I be able to watch 24x7 video streams from a local school
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 01:31:38 -0700
Subject: [IP] Hard caps (or equivalent pricing) are wrong
From: Dave Burstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06,
vis-a-vis outside Internet
competition.
Where peering is expensive the situation can be viewed as
different, though the question of whether that pricing is an
organic function or artificial is of course relevant.
-- Lauren Weinstein
NNSquad Moderator
[ Fears of anticompetitive or unfair tactics from the telephone
and cable ISPs -- the same operations that anti-neutrality
forces frequently argue should be left essentially unregulated?
-- Lauren Weinstein
NNSquad Moderator ]
--- Forwarded
The response below refers to:
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080807-cablecos-ponder-networked-dvrs-in-wake-of-cablevision-ruling.html
I'll also note that, if the often painfully sluggish behavior of
even recent vintage Video on Demand systems is any example
(including the newest OCAP
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tactics (was: Re: [IP] Re: Upcoming conference on Broadband Census
for America)
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 17:30:48 -0400
Begin forwarded message:
From: Lauren Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: August
BT throttling
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/07/bt_samknows_bandwidth_throttling/
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
Odlyzko on Net Neutrality, Google, etc.
For the record, I do not agree with Odlyzko's analysis suggesting
that search neutrality or cloud computing dominance issues are
likely to be viewed as far more insidious than ISP walled gardens
or similar non-neutral ISP network constructs. Among other
PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 17:39:57 -0700
From: Lauren Weinstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Time to look at why they like tiered approaches. Does wreck internet
video deliveries economics. Sounds like maybe carriers should be
banned from media delivery. djf
Dave,
You're not kidding
U.S. broadband adoption hits 7-year low
http://blog.wired.com/business/2008/08/us-broadband-sp.html
--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] McDowell Addresses Broadband Issues at Heritage Foundation
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:43:15 -0400
Begin forwarded message:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dewayne Hendricks)
Date: August 13, 2008
--- Forwarded Message
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] NSF and the Birth of the Internet
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:23:22 -0400
Begin forwarded message:
From: Richard Forno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: August 17, 2008 12:20:59 PM EDT
To:
1 - 100 of 17449 matches
Mail list logo
