Manno15 commented on pull request #1818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1818#issuecomment-747381390
The test with agitation also went well. 7 server, technically 8 node
cluster. Received the same warnings as above and the only other warnings/errors
are I think due to the
Manno15 edited a comment on pull request #1818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1818#issuecomment-747381390
The test with agitation also went well. 7 server, technically 8 node
cluster. Received the same warnings as above and the only other warnings/errors
are I think due to
Manno15 commented on pull request #1818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1818#issuecomment-747570194
This is what I am running into with trying to verify using accumulo-testing
cingest/verify. I understand the error but nothing is working to fix it.
```
Exception in
dlmarion commented on pull request #1818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1818#issuecomment-747575246
So you are running with Java 8 and the jar file was compile with Java 11,
for example. That jar will need to be re-compiled with Java 8.
Manno15 commented on pull request #1818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1818#issuecomment-747579226
I've tried that but I will try again.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
dlmarion commented on pull request #1818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1818#issuecomment-747567220
Do you have a stack trace?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
ctubbsii commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545389383
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/NextBatchTask.java
##
@@ -89,14 +88,16 @@ public void run() {
}
EdColeman commented on issue #637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/637#issuecomment-747688533
This "type: of issue was also discussed in
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1086.
This is an automated
EdColeman edited a comment on issue #637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/637#issuecomment-747688533
This "type" of issue was also discussed in
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1086.
This is an
Manno15 commented on pull request #1818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1818#issuecomment-747638788
I got it to work. I forgot hadoop has an export JAVA_HOME of its own and
that was exporting java 8 still for some reason. Thanks for your help guys. I
will update you with the
DomGarguilo commented on issue #637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/637#issuecomment-747671402
The attached link suggests the use of `.withProtection()` while creating the
ephemeral sequential nodes. From what I can tell, this is an apache curator
function which is not
ctubbsii opened a new issue #1841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1841
**Test name(s)**
- ConcurrentDeleteTableIT.testConcurrentDeleteTablesOps took 587 seconds
(nearly 10 minutes)
- ConcurrentDeleteTableIT.testConcurrentFateOpsWithDelete took 1,152
seconds (nearly
ctubbsii commented on pull request #1818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1818#issuecomment-747603412
Accumulo 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT actually requires Java 11. You shouldn't need to
recompile with Java 8 (accumulo-testing already compiles as Java 8 using the
`-release 8` flag). You
Manno15 commented on pull request #1818:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1818#issuecomment-747616460
I did and still get the same error. I tried on a different node too and
nothing. It does work locally so must be something related to the cluster.
dlmarion commented on issue #1606:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1606#issuecomment-747650183
@FineAndDandy - any updated information on the question in the comment
above? Is this still an issue?
This is an
dlmarion commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545391850
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/LookupTask.java
##
@@ -177,9 +177,13 @@ public void run() {
}
dlmarion commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545392485
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/NextBatchTask.java
##
@@ -89,14 +88,16 @@ public void run() {
}
ctubbsii commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545345733
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/LookupTask.java
##
@@ -177,9 +177,13 @@ public void run() {
}
dlmarion commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545362727
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/NextBatchTask.java
##
@@ -89,14 +88,16 @@ public void run() {
}
ctubbsii commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545391316
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/NextBatchTask.java
##
@@ -89,14 +89,15 @@ public void run() {
}
dlmarion commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545364298
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/NextBatchTask.java
##
@@ -89,14 +88,16 @@ public void run() {
}
dlmarion commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545364298
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/NextBatchTask.java
##
@@ -89,14 +88,16 @@ public void run() {
}
ctubbsii commented on issue #637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/637#issuecomment-747686478
@DomGarguilo I think the idea was to see how Curator solves the issue, to
see if we can adopt a similar strategy in the relevant code in Accumulo. We
have previously attempted (a
ctubbsii commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545388080
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/LookupTask.java
##
@@ -177,9 +177,13 @@ public void run() {
}
ctubbsii opened a new pull request #1842:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1842
* Increase the default memory for mini-based ITs (from 128MB to 256MB)
The justification for this is that using the G1GC in newer JVMs seems
to use a little bit more base memory than the
dlmarion opened a new pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840
Modified code that was catching Throwable to mostly catch Exception, unless
Throwable was being re-thrown. This, in conjunction with
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1818, should expose
dlmarion commented on issue #1559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1559#issuecomment-747652022
@milleruntime - should this issue be closed as the PR for it is merged? Is
there something still left to do?
This
ctubbsii commented on issue #1559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1559#issuecomment-747659563
@dlmarion I think this was just overlooked and not automatically closed
because the original linked PR was for 1.10, and the 2.1 PR that was merged was
separate. I can close it
ctubbsii closed issue #1559:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/1559
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
dlmarion commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545361484
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/LookupTask.java
##
@@ -177,9 +177,13 @@ public void run() {
}
ctubbsii commented on a change in pull request #1840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/1840#discussion_r545405013
##
File path:
server/tserver/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/tserver/scan/NextBatchTask.java
##
@@ -89,14 +88,16 @@ public void run() {
}
31 matches
Mail list logo
